Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Buggman; 1000 silverlings; DAVEY CROCKETT; Dr. Eckleburg; HarleyD; ladyinred; Alex Murphy; ...
I assume that means in your presentation you will be explaining how this is more related (if not exclusively related) to the second coming than the first. Otherwise isn't the entire argument about the fall feasts and the second coming a bit bogus?
40 posted on 09/20/2006 1:14:09 PM PDT by topcat54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: topcat54; 1000 silverlings; DAVEY CROCKETT; Dr. Eckleburg; HarleyD; ladyinred; Alex Murphy
I assume that means in your presentation you will be explaining how this is more related (if not exclusively related) to the second coming than the first.

Yes. And I'll go ahead and give you part of the answer: You have to understand that Biblical prophecy is about pattern, not just prediction. And the pattern in this case is the whole first year of the Exodus.

I'll explain what I mean by that in my next article. I'm not going to debate it further now because I don't want to give in piecemail what needs to be presented as a unified argument.

42 posted on 09/20/2006 1:25:14 PM PDT by Buggman (http://brit-chadasha.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: topcat54

I think "bogus"

hereon

tends to be like "beauty"

. . . in the eyes of the beholder.


82 posted on 09/21/2006 12:21:39 AM PDT by Quix (LET GOD ARISE AND HIS ENEMIES BE SCATTERED. LET ISRAEL CALL ON GOD AS THEIRS! & ISLAM FLUSH ITSELF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson