Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Am I Catholic?
Veritas ^ | C. Therese Benoit

Posted on 11/17/2006 7:32:40 AM PST by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last
To: adiaireton8
BTW, is refering to one who steals as "thief" still considered ad hominem?
61 posted on 11/17/2006 1:29:13 PM PST by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: papertyger
'Evidence' in its broader sense includes reasons, regardless of the persuasiveness of those reasons. If you think the assertion is false, then simply state that it "begs the question". I suspect that's what you were trying to say when you said "non sequitur".

-A8

62 posted on 11/17/2006 1:33:03 PM PST by adiaireton8 ("There is no greater evil one can suffer than to hate reasonable discourse." - Plato, Phaedo 89d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: adiaireton8
'Evidence' in its broader sense includes reasons, regardless of the persuasiveness of those reasons.

To what "reason" are you refering? How does it differ from gratuitous assertion?

If you think the assertion is false, then simply state that it "begs the question". I suspect that's what you were trying to say when you said "non sequitur".

I don't think the assertion is false. I think it answers a question I did not ask.

What would you call it if I asked for your phone number, and you gave me a "home team" cheer?

63 posted on 11/17/2006 1:53:10 PM PST by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: papertyger
It depends on the context. If a thief refutes your argument, and you respond by saying "You are a thief", that's an ad hominem. It is an ad hominem *fallacy* because it is a response that attacks the person as a way of undermining the person's comments about an argument, instead of refuting the person's comments. When the context is not a discussion about some [non-indexical] claim or argument, then predicating 'thief' of someone is not necessarily an ad hominem fallacy.

-A8

64 posted on 11/17/2006 1:55:33 PM PST by adiaireton8 ("There is no greater evil one can suffer than to hate reasonable discourse." - Plato, Phaedo 89d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: papertyger
To what "reason" are you refering?

"Because it's true." (from post #24)

How does it differ from gratuitous assertion?

An assertion is a communicative act. A reason is a logical premise. A reason can be asserted, but not every assertion is a reason. What you really want to say instead of "gratituous assertion" is "unsupported" or "question-begging" reason.

I don't think the assertion is false. I think it answers a question I did not ask.

I thought your question was: "how about giving me the condensed version?" (post #11) The condensed version is an answer to the question: "Why should I be Catholic?" (i.e. the title of this thread). And in #24 murphE gave you the condensed version: "Because it's true". But perhaps your question in (#11) has been misunderstood.

-A8

65 posted on 11/17/2006 2:06:58 PM PST by adiaireton8 ("There is no greater evil one can suffer than to hate reasonable discourse." - Plato, Phaedo 89d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Nihil Obstat

LOL! Party hearty, fisheaters!


66 posted on 11/17/2006 2:19:42 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: adiaireton8
The condensed version is an answer to the question: "Why should I be Catholic?" (i.e. the title of this thread). And in #24 murphE gave you the condensed version: "Because it's true". But perhaps your question in (#11) has been misunderstood. -A8

There's the disconnect. My question was for condensation of " Perhaps this conversion story (link) will put it all into focus," not "why be Catholic."

67 posted on 11/17/2006 2:39:15 PM PST by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: papertyger
The weaknesses of electronic communication!! Glad we got that cleared up. :-)

-A8

68 posted on 11/17/2006 2:49:47 PM PST by adiaireton8 ("There is no greater evil one can suffer than to hate reasonable discourse." - Plato, Phaedo 89d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: adiaireton8
An assertion is a communicative act. A reason is a logical premise. A reason can be asserted, but not every assertion is a reason.

Doesn't the word "because" denote a chain of reasoning by definiton?

69 posted on 11/17/2006 2:51:40 PM PST by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: adiaireton8
The weaknesses of electronic communication!! Glad we got that cleared up. :-)

The weakness in no small part is my vanity. Sorry, FRiend.

70 posted on 11/17/2006 2:54:31 PM PST by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: papertyger
Doesn't the word "because" denote a chain of reasoning by definiton?

Not necessarily; it can denote a causal relation.

-A8

71 posted on 11/17/2006 3:05:00 PM PST by adiaireton8 ("There is no greater evil one can suffer than to hate reasonable discourse." - Plato, Phaedo 89d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: papertyger
I appreciate your humility.

-A8

72 posted on 11/17/2006 3:05:42 PM PST by adiaireton8 ("There is no greater evil one can suffer than to hate reasonable discourse." - Plato, Phaedo 89d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred

"You do know this is a cartoon?"

Ah but we can all dream.....;)


73 posted on 11/17/2006 3:44:52 PM PST by mockingbyrd (Good heavens! What women these Christians have-----Libanus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: mockingbyrd

LOL!


74 posted on 11/17/2006 4:22:07 PM PST by ladyinred (RIP my precious Lamb Chop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: papertyger; AnAmericanMother

Well, I'm a 21st Century American like yourself, with all the cultural limitations that entails: distant from the richness of the High Middle Ages, and even more distant from a Patristic or Biblical sensibility.

I don't find that all Marian devotions appeal to me emotionally or aesthetically. I have had to ponder a lot, sometimes in puzzlement, and for years; in fact, quite often when I pray the Rosary I ask the Holy Spirit to help me to better understand and grasp these beautiful and mysterious things.

But if "my life, my sweetness and my hope" distracts you to the point where you're irritated and disturbed, by all means choose some other text. Fr. Benedict Groechel says, "Pray as you can, not as you can't." Amen to that!


75 posted on 11/17/2006 4:52:05 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Pray (pray!) -- Oh yes we pray (pray!) --- we've got to pray just to make it today. --- MC Hammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Why am I Catholic?

Well, to be honest, Catholic women are better.

Yep, starting with the Virgin Mary and following on to my mom...and hopefully a wife one day.

Many are attracted to the Faith because of another's life of Holiness.

Hmmm, I wonder how many converts came from being more than merely sexually attracted to a spiritual mate? I'll be the Angels keep count...using Rosary beads, of course.
76 posted on 11/18/2006 10:11:04 PM PST by SaltyJoe ("Social Justice" for the Unborn Child)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson