So you want us to prove a negative in light of the fact that the alleged massacre cannot be proved?
The poster of the thread claimed as fact in post #2, that your so called "negative" had in fact already been proven. I quote:
"It's already been proven there was no massacure nor any ethnic cleansing."
I was simply asking for evidence of this so-called "proof". Take it up with him or her.
And who says that it's "a fact that the alleged massacre cannot be proved"? Would that be you? You mean it cannot be proved to your satisfaction, right?"
Some folk are still demanding proof for the Holocaust and the moon landing. No standard of proof is sufficient for those to whom the truth is inconvenient.