Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A priest writes to Nancy Pelosi:
EMail | February 1, 2007 | Rev. John Malloy, SDB

Posted on 02/03/2007 4:35:22 PM PST by franky

A priest writes to Nancy Pelosi:

“If you can kill a baby in the womb, Nancy, why not outside of it?”

Fr. John Malloy, pastor of Saints Peter and Paul Church in San Francisco, penned this “Open letter to Nancy Pelosi,” which was recently published in the parish bulletin. We reprint it here with Fr. Malloy’s permission.

Nancy, you are fooling yourself and I fear fooling many good Catholics. You are simply not in sync with the Catholic Church. Until you change your non-Catholic positions, you should stop calling yourself Catholic. Your record shows that you support embryonic stem cell research, Planned Parenthood, contraception, family planning funding, allowing minors to have an abortion without parental consent, and are against making it a crime to harm a fetus, etc. etc.

The fact that you favor married priests and women priests certainly would not classify you as conservative, but your answer to the question are you a conservative Catholic was: “I think so. I was raised in a very strict upbringing in a Catholic home where we respected people, were observant, were practicing Catholics, and that the fundamental belief was that God gave us all a free will, and we were accountable for that, each of us. Each person had that accountability, so it wasn’t for us to make judgments about how people saw their responsibility and that it wasn’t for politicians to make decisions about how people led their personal lives; certainly, to a high moral standards, but when it got into decisions about privacy and all the rest, then that was something that individuals had to answer to God for, and not to politicians.”

That sounds fair and tolerant, but your record belies high moral standards.

The NARAL rates you 100% pro-abortion. Your statement: “To me it isn’t even a question. God has given us a free will. We’re all responsible for our actions. If you don’t want an abortion, you don’t believe in it, [then] don’t have one. But don’t tell somebody else what they can do in terms of honoring their responsibilities. My family is very pro-life. They’re not fanatics and they’re not activists. I think they’d like it if I were not so vocally pro-choice.”

Do we not elect politicians to make laws that help people honor their responsibilities, such as protecting life itself? Can politicians not tell someone else not to kill? If you can kill a baby in the womb, Nancy, why not outside of it? Oh wait, you are in favor of partial birth abortion, so-called because the baby sticks out of the “mother” about halfway, while the “doctor” sucks out the baby's brain. That seems comparable to the choice the Nazis made killing six million Jews.

Yes, Nancy, we (together with your pro-life family) would all like it if you were not so vocally pro-choice, i.e. pro-death. Until your choice is in line with Catholic doctrine, please, Nancy, do not receive the Eucharist when you attend Mass.

Rev. John Malloy, SDB San Francisco, CA


TOPICS: Activism; Current Events; Moral Issues; Religion & Science
KEYWORDS: catholic; pelosi; piglosi; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last
To: phatus maximus
I found the extreme irony so sad that he was going to be charged for 2nd degree murder (and absolutely rightly so thankfully - honestly I was shocked they charged him with this) yet millions of women every year do the same thing to their unborn children and they are applauded for being "in control of their bodies".

The irony is double ... he was charged with 2nd degree murder , which implies a lack of premeditation. Those who commit abortion do so with malice aforethought. I particularly mean the abortionists (the mothers are often under considerable duress). They should be charged with 1st degree murder.

61 posted on 02/05/2007 5:43:10 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: livius

Thanks, I was wondering where this church was in San Fran. Well, we have orthodox parishes here in Los Angeles too.


62 posted on 02/05/2007 6:54:02 AM PST by bboop (Stealth Tutor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma
They are so perverse they want to kill the babies but save the murderers. They are morally opposed to capital punishment. What sense does that make?

It doesn't, unless someone is taking the opposite position they should out of a childish spite against G-d.

63 posted on 02/05/2007 7:14:10 AM PST by Zionist Conspirator ('Anokhi HaShem 'Eloqeykha 'asher hotzei'tikha me'Eretz Mitzrayim, mibeit-`avadim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: franky

Good for this priest. At least his parishioners will know that Pelosi is not a Catholic in good standing.


64 posted on 02/05/2007 7:16:54 AM PST by steadfastconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: franky

From what I hear, the Bishop of San Francisco won't like this. Too bad, and God bless Father John Molloy for speaking truth to power.


65 posted on 02/05/2007 8:13:51 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard; phatus maximus
I found the extreme irony so sad that he was going to be charged for 2nd degree murder (and absolutely rightly so thankfully - honestly I was shocked they charged him with this) yet millions of women every year do the same thing to their unborn children and they are applauded for being "in control of their bodies".

Perhaps this is a start down the road of reason in that the contradiction is so obvious and jarring that the logic of legalized abortion will begin to break down under the strain. I understand that pro-abort groups fear just that development. They would be hard pressed to come up with an appealing rationalization.

66 posted on 02/05/2007 1:56:52 PM PST by Homer_J_Simpson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

Correct, probably even more so...


67 posted on 02/05/2007 6:02:15 PM PST by phatus maximus (John 6:29...Learn it, love it, live it...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

interesting observation, I had not thought of it in that context...well said.


68 posted on 02/05/2007 6:03:51 PM PST by phatus maximus (John 6:29...Learn it, love it, live it...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Homer_J_Simpson; ArrogantBustard

Let's hope so...


69 posted on 02/05/2007 6:05:06 PM PST by phatus maximus (John 6:29...Learn it, love it, live it...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: right-wingin_It
Nancy Pelosi, recalled. “But I thought I might want to be a priest. There seemed to be a little more power there, a little more discretion over what was going on in the parish.”

Spoken like a diehard feminist. These are the exact type of people I DON'T want becoming priests, be they male or female

70 posted on 02/05/2007 9:54:51 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen
Pro-choice Catholic politicians will accept Communion until forced to do otherwise.

Instead of refusing them Communion, maybe the Church should refuse to bury them with a Catholic funeral. Maybe they'll start thinking more seriously about it.

71 posted on 02/05/2007 10:06:41 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
Instead of refusing them Communion, maybe the Church should refuse to bury them with a Catholic funeral.

As a faithful Christian that might be meaningful to you, but to a secular humanist it would mean: "Great - no consequences for my behavior in this life. In the hereafter, who knows? Maybe God is a liberal woman!" I exaggerate, but only slightly.

72 posted on 02/06/2007 4:21:30 AM PST by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen
Oh no. You don't understand. These nominally Catholic politicos want a LEGACY! They want to go out with a grand funeral Mass, with the incense and choir and all the bells and whistles; maybe even a Bishop presiding.

If it is made clear to them they will NEVER get that, it might make them think twice. One never knows, does one. It would certainly get them in a place they care about very much; their VANITY, if not their immortal souls.

73 posted on 02/06/2007 8:31:53 AM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: franky
He's wasting his breath on that old hag. A woman convinced against her will is of the same opinion still.

Spiritually speaking however, her blood is no longer on his hands.

74 posted on 02/06/2007 2:32:47 PM PST by pray4liberty (http://totallyunjust.tripod.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ

I hadn't thought of it that way.


75 posted on 02/06/2007 2:36:36 PM PST by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: franky
a catholic priest writing a letter against a catholic democrat. He'll be ostracized and sent to a small church far away from everyone.
76 posted on 02/06/2007 6:42:13 PM PST by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, insects)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson