Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Visible Church Was There All Along
http://www.chnetwork.org/cbconv.htm ^ | Unknown | Cindy Beck

Posted on 02/24/2007 4:59:51 PM PST by stfassisi

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 221-223 next last
To: Gamecock; wmfights; xzins; AlaninSA; Dr. Eckleburg
Still not fair. ;-)

How about John MacArthur vesus the entire College of Cardinals?

161 posted on 02/26/2007 12:44:21 PM PST by P-Marlowe (What happened to my tagline?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: AlaninSA; Dr. Eckleburg; Gamecock; P-Marlowe
faith without works is dead

Since you are a bible expert, are there other passages in the bible that say other things about the relationship between faith and works?

What do they say?

162 posted on 02/26/2007 12:47:28 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
How about John MacArthur vesus the entire College of Cardinals?

I'll take MacArthur to win. The Cardinals might not even show.

163 posted on 02/26/2007 12:50:14 PM PST by Gamecock (Ecclesia reformata, semper reformanda secundum verbum Dei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
John MacArthur against the College of Cardinals

True.

But John wouldn't be nearly as good on the subject of church liability in clergy abuse suits.

164 posted on 02/26/2007 12:50:47 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: xzins

lol.


165 posted on 02/26/2007 1:11:58 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock; P-Marlowe; xzins

Tell John to eat before he comes and pass up the refreshments.


166 posted on 02/26/2007 1:14:01 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: wmfights

ping to 166. I came to this late.


167 posted on 02/26/2007 1:16:04 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Invincibly Ignorant

Thank you. I really was not sure.


168 posted on 02/26/2007 2:51:36 PM PST by lastchance (Hug your babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator

I have enjoyed reading your posts. I always appreciate a civil debate. And you too have shown patience with my stumbling through this issue.

I never doubted that Esther existed. I have not yet seen the movie One Night With The King, but hope it is faithful to the Bible. Too often Bible movies take way too many liberties with the original source material.

May G-d bless and keep you always.


169 posted on 02/26/2007 3:06:45 PM PST by lastchance (Hug your babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
I believe I stated in at least two posts on this thread that I was losing/had lost all respect for you. This is a public apology for those very public insults.

I shall endeavor (beli neder) to hold my emotions in check to a greater extent in the future.

170 posted on 02/26/2007 3:15:58 PM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Zakhor 'et 'asher-`asah lekha `Amaleq, baderekh betze'tekhem miMitzrayim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xzins; P-Marlowe; Gamecock; Dr. Eckleburg

All bets are off that this has all been any kind of class-act humor.

Besides, in my ignorance, I didn't realize this was all about Bible-quote reality shows.

All of us here know that even the devil can quote Scripture.

Christ Jesus is a life to be lived.





171 posted on 02/26/2007 3:24:58 PM PST by Running On Empty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I did not and do not portray myself as a Bible expert, "xzins." But, if you ask...I'll defer to a fellow Catholic who's a better qualified speaker than I:

During the Protestant Reformation in the early 1500s, a familiar term regarding salvation was "sola fide," Latin for "by faith alone." The reformers, at that time, accused the Catholic Church of departing from the "simple purity of the Gospel" of Jesus Christ. They stated it was faith alone, without works of any kind, that brought a believer to eternal life. They defined this faith as "the confidence of man, associated with the certainty of salvation, because the merciful Father will forgive sins because of Christ's sake."
This view of salvation is a crucial issue because it strikes at the very heart of the Gospel message eternal life. Roman Catholicism teaches that we are not saved by faith alone. The Church has taught this since 30 A.D. as part of the Divine Revelation. The truth of the Catholic Church's teaching can be demonstrated from Sacred Scripture alone.

All who claim the title "Christian" will be able to agree on the following two truths: salvation is by grace alone (Ephesians 2:8) and salvation is through Christ alone (Acts 4:12). These biblical facts will be our foundation as we explain the teaching of the Catholic Church.

If we take a concordance and look up every occurrence of the word "faith," we come up with an undeniable fact the only time the phrase "faith alone" is used in the entire Bible is when it is condemned (James 2:24). The epistle of James only mentions it in the negative sense.

The Bible tells us we must have faith in order to be saved (Hebrews 11:6). Yet is faith nothing more than believing and trusting? Searching the Scriptures, we see faith also involves assent to God's truth (1 Thessalonians 2:13), obedience to Him (Romans 1:5, 16:26), and it must be working in love (Galatians 5:6). These points appeared to be missed by the reformers, yet they are just as crucial as believing and trusting. (1 Corinthians 13:1-3) should be heeded by all it's certainly an attention grabber.

Paul speaks of faith as a life-long process, never as a one-time experience (Philippians 2:12). He never assumes he has nothing to worry about. If he did, his words in (1 Corinthians 9:24-27) would be nonsensical. He reiterates the same point again in his second letter to Corinth (2 Corinthians 13:5). He takes nothing for granted, yet all would agree if anyone was "born again" it certainly was Paul. Our Lord and Savior spoke of the same thing by "remaining in Him" (John 15:1-11).

Paul tells us our faith is living and can go through many stages. It never stays permanently fixed after a single conversion experience no matter how genuine or sincere. Our faith can be shipwrecked (1 Timothy 1:19), departed from (1 Timothy 4:1), disowned (1 Timothy 5:8) wandered from (1 Timothy 6:10), and missed (1 Timothy 6:21). Christians do not have a "waiver" that exempts them from these verses.

Do our works mean anything? According to Jesus they do (Matthew 25:31-46). The people rewarded and punished are done so by their actions. And our thoughts (Matthew 15:18-20) and words (James 3:6-12) are accountable as well. These verses are just as much part of the Bible as Romans 10:8-13 and John 3:3-5.

Some will object by appealing to Romans 4:3 and stating Abraham was "declared righteous" before circumcision. Thus he was only saved by "believing" faith (Genesis 15:6), not by faith "working in love" (Galatians 5:6). Isn't this what Paul means when he says none will be justified by "works of law" (Romans 3:28)? No, this is not what he means. He's condemning the Old Covenant sacrifices and rituals which couldn't justify and pointing to better things now in Christ Jesus in the New Covenant (Hebrews 7-10). A close examination of Abraham's life revealed a man of God who did something. In Genesis 12-14 he makes two geographical moves, builds an altar and calls on the Lord, divides land with Lot to end quarrels, pays tithes, and refuses goods from the King of Sodom to rely instead on God's providence. He did all these works as an old man. It was certainly a struggle. After all these actions of faith, then he's "declared righteous" (Genesis 15:6). Did these works play a role in his justification? According to the Bible, yes.

The Catholic Church has never taught we "earn" our salvation. It is an inheritance (Galatians 5:21), freely given to anyone who becomes a child of God (1 John 3:1), so long as they remain that way (John 15:1-11). You can't earn it but you can lose the free gift given from the Father (James 1:17).

The reformer's position cannot be reconciled with the Bible. That is why the Catholic Church has taught otherwise for over 1,960 years.

Where does our assistance come from to reach our heavenly destination? Philippians 4:13 says it all, "I can do all things in Him who strengthens me."

(Sal Ciresi has lectured on apologetics in the diocese of Arlington, VA and has resided in Northern Virginia since his discharge from the Marine Corps in 1991.)


172 posted on 02/26/2007 5:29:45 PM PST by AlaninSA ("Beware the fury of a patient man." - John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: xzins

As for any "contest," I'd happily pay to see that.

I've attended protestant "churches" - Baptist, Presby, "reformed" and Lutheran. Of those, only the Lutherans actually read from entire passages of the Bible. Oh, the others referenced it - citing short parts of sentences to back up the statements in their "lessons" or "talks" - but they never read entire segments.

The Catholic Church, Lutherans, Anglicans and Orthos actually read the entire Bible during their liturgical seasons/years.

Find me one Baptist Church where entire segments are read from the Bible...I've not seen one...and I actually have done this research.

Doubtful that many of the haters on this forum have actually attended the Mass they're so quick to condemn.


173 posted on 02/26/2007 5:33:16 PM PST by AlaninSA ("Beware the fury of a patient man." - John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: AlaninSA; xzins
"Find me one Baptist Church where entire segments are read from the Bible...I've not seen one...and I actually have done this research. "

You don't know what you are talking about. Go to any Conservative Baptist Church, Baptist General Conference Church, Fundamentalist Baptist Church, Reformed Baptist Church or Independent Fundamentalist Baptist Church and the majority of the SBC churches and they are mostly expositional preaching churches, which interpreted for you since it appears you don't know what that means, they take entire passages of scripture, in context, and explicate the passage, verse by verse.

"Doubtful that many of the haters on this forum have actually attended the Mass they're so quick to condemn."

I have attended many masses and sat through the 10 minute "Readers Digest" homilies. I have 4 former RCs in my small group bible study from different parishes and all say the same thing, they didn't begin to study or understand the scriptures until they came out of Roman Catholicism and trusted Christ alone for their salvation.
174 posted on 02/26/2007 5:54:29 PM PST by blue-duncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: blue-duncan; AlaninSA; xzins
I have attended many masses and sat through the 10 minute "Readers Digest" homilies. I have 4 former RCs in my small group bible study from different parishes and all say the same thing, they didn't begin to study or understand the scriptures until they came out of Roman Catholicism and trusted Christ alone for their salvation.

Amen brother! Your experience is not unique.

I am a member at a large urban church. Appx. 25% of our membership are ex RC's. RC's are stunned when they first come to services. People bring Bibles, open them and read the passages the Pastor is speaking about. A message may take 4-6 weeks to complete. A service is typically 90 minutes with the message being about 50 of those minutes.

175 posted on 02/26/2007 7:47:13 PM PST by wmfights (LUKE 9:49-50 , MARK 9:38-41)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: AlaninSA; P-Marlowe; Dr. Eckleburg; Gamecock; wmfights
I did not and do not portray myself as a Bible expert, "xzins."

What you said was "if only Protestants knew their bible." That means you know quite about about protestants, or the bible, or both. Enough to run them down, anyway.

176 posted on 02/26/2007 8:03:38 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: xzins; AlaninSA; P-Marlowe; Dr. Eckleburg; Gamecock
What you said was "if only Protestants knew their bible."

FWIW, the confusion might be that there is a disconnect between the RC posters here and RC's in the world. I think a lot of RC's that post here are pretty knowledgeable about the Bible, although their understanding is flawed. However, in the world you can't honestly say that is the case. The RC's history is to rely on the RCC to do the interpreting and reading. This might also explain why offense was taken when we started joking about Bible knowledge. The joke hit too close to home.

177 posted on 02/26/2007 8:37:40 PM PST by wmfights (LUKE 9:49-50 , MARK 9:38-41)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Running On Empty; xzins; P-Marlowe; Dr. Eckleburg

***All of us here know that even the devil can quote Scripture. ***

All the more reason we know Scripture. Christ used Scripture to rebuke Satan.




***Christ Jesus is a life to be lived.***

Christ lived the life we can't. We are to put our faith in Him.


178 posted on 02/26/2007 9:57:51 PM PST by Gamecock (Ecclesia reformata, semper reformanda secundum verbum Dei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
Christ lived the life we can't. We are to put our faith in Him.

Amen. That is the heart of the Gospel.

179 posted on 02/26/2007 10:20:40 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Of course we can't live Christ's life. You are splitting hairs.

I am convinced you understood what I meant, and I don't have to repeat the quotes from Scripture to amplify it. I've already done that.

It's a mistake to think that there are only certain people who read, understand and live by Scripture, though by some posts on these threads, one would think otherwise. There are many Catholics who know the Bible very well and live by it. It's a fallacy to assume or assert otherwise.




.


180 posted on 02/26/2007 10:53:57 PM PST by Running On Empty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 221-223 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson