Posted on 03/28/2007 4:32:53 AM PDT by MarkBsnr
HELL is a place where sinners really do burn in an everlasting fire, and not just a religious symbol designed to galvanise the faithful, Pope Benedict XVI has said. Addressing a parish gathering in a northern suburb of Rome, the Pope said that in the modern world many people, including some believers, had forgotten that if they failed to "admit blame and promise to sin no more", they risked "eternal damnation - the inferno". Hell "really exists and is eternal, even if nobody talks about it much any more". The Pope, who as cardinal Joseph Ratzinger was head of Catholic doctrine, noted that "forgiveness of sins" for those who repented was a cornerstone of Christian belief. He recalled that Jesus had forgiven the "woman taken in adultery" and prevented her from being stoned to death, observing: "He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her." God had given men and women free will to choose whether "spontaneously to accept salvation...the Christian faith is not imposed on anyone, it is a gift, an offer to mankind". Vatican officials said the Pope - who is also the Bishop of Rome - had been speaking in "straightforward" language "like a parish priest". He had wanted to reinforce the new Catholic catechism, which holds that hell is a "state of eternal separation from God", to be understood "symbolically rather than physically". Agostino Paravicini Bagliani, a church historian, said the Pope was "right to remind us that hell is not something to be put on one side" as an inconvenient or embarrassing aspect of belief. It was described by St Matthew as a place of "everlasting fire" (Matthew xxv, 41).
(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.au ...
I think that's pretty obvious. They probaly think Heavan is a 'place' as well.
It's funny; you can never seem to really understand exactly what they believe in. Every time you zoom in, they revert back to "we believe in the Bible."
Like latter day Luthers or copycat Calvins, they know what they don't want - external objective authority that lays out the thoughts, beliefs and behaviours that the Lord God Almighty expects of us. Every one considers him/herself as equally or better qualified than the Magisterium to interpret Scripture, pointedly ignoring the admonishment in Scripture itself.
Apostacy and heresy aplenty, here.
It's totally narcissistic, it's the me-me-me "trinity," and as such contrary to the spirit of what the Lord taught.
The pertinent words are in the penultimate paragraph:
"E’ venuto Gesù per dirci che ci vuole tutti in Paradiso e che l’inferno, del quale poco si parla in questo nostro tempo, esiste ed è eterno per quanti chiudono il cuore al suo amore."The English translation is
"Jesus came to tell us that He wants us all in heaven and that hell - of which so little is said in our time - exists and is eternal for those who close their hearts to His love."Nowhere in the original Italian is the word that means "place." The most common Italian words that mean place are "luogo" and "posto."
Thank you! Someone else correctly commented that this article by Richard Owen was poorly written by someone who basically doesn't know what he is talking about. Heaven and Hell are the states (conditions) of our souls after death. The unrepentant soul eventually will exist in hell (separation from God, spiritual torment); the repentant soul will eventually exist in heaven (spiritual bliss, joy). The Orthodox and Catholics offer commemorative services for the repentant souls as both particular Churches have always recognized an intermediate state between the particular and final judgments, although the exact terminology of that state has not been agreed on.
He had wanted to reinforce the new Catholic catechism, which holds that hell is a "state of eternal separation from God", to be understood "symbolically rather than physically".
The only "new Catholic catechism" I know of is close to 15 years old. And it never says hell is to be understood "symbolically rather than physically"; in fact, it doesn't use the word "symbolic" or "symbolically" in reference to hell at all.
So what's he talking about?
It's really amazing how much the MSM can muddle the Vatican, and indeed almost anything else they report on.
Oh, without a doubt. How can separation from God be "symbolic?" Maybe he wanted to say "spiritual" but couldn't think of the word? :)
Like any "state" of existence, hell it can co-exist right next to and in the presence of another state. Someone who is in a bad state (i.e. mood) can find even the most enjoyable cirucmstances annoying and unbearable. If somone is unhappy there is nothing worse tha being surrounded by happy people (especially if you can't change!).
new Catholic catechism...
It seems this individual never really read the Catechism, but he didn't mind writng about it.
What do you suppose Jesus did with his body when he left His grave, stuffed it in a dumpster somewhere???
And Jesus really didn't go to prepare a place for us???
If Jesus body wasn't ressurrected, where did it go??? If heaven is a state of mind, why did people see Jesus going up???
No one can ascend to heaven before Jesus decends first...Sounds like a place to me...
As to what happened to His Body, neither you nor anyone else knows. To say that He literally sits to the right of the Father suggests that God the Father also has a body (Mormonism alert!) when we know that he is a Spirit (who also has a "Spirit").
In other words, don't read into anything you read in the Bible.
Nobody (on our side) ever said heaven (or hell) was a "state of mind".
Heaven really exists, and it really exists in some sense is physical, because there are real, physical, glorified, human bodies there right now.
(It doesn't follow that it physically exists in our universe, such that you could build a spaceship and fly there, however.)
Right, and probably doesn't believe very much of the rest of the bible either.
The gentle and loving Jesus Himself warned sinners of the reality of hell by his parable of the rich man and the beggar. But modernist apologists have twisted His warning around to simply mean that hell is just an unpleasant state of mind for unrepentant sinners, and that a loving God would not condemn any sinner no matter how vile to eternal damnation in a literal hell.
Wrong, and millions of unrepentant sinners will no doubt be condemned to hell because they willingly accepted the modernists' false interpretation of Christ's parable and the many other biblical references to hell. If the deceived are punished severely for believing the lies of Satan's servants, how much more severe will the penalty be for those who knowingly propagate those lies?
The Apostle John knew because he witnessed Jesus's glorified and ascended body with his own eyes on the Isle of Patmos. He then described in the first chapter of the Apocalypse His ascended and glorified body as He now sits at the right hand of the Father making intercession for our souls.
Jesus Christ's body in not now an ethereal spirit as it was before His advent on earth. Ever since He divested Himself of His divine spiritual body and came to earth born of the Virgin Mary in a sinless human body He lived first in a human body like our own except for our ability to commit sin, and since His resurrection and ascension He has been and eternally will be living in a glorified divine body similar to the glorified human body which we will inhabit in Heaven forever if we are a member of His spiritual body on earth, aka His blood-bought bride the Church.
(It doesn't follow that it physically exists in our universe, such that you could build a spaceship and fly there, however.)
Seems a number of your fellow compadres' don't actually agree with the even partial physical existance of heaven
I can't imagine why you would think heaven is not physical...The bible clearly says that our dead bodies will be physically resurrected (and changed)
I'd be interested in what a Catholic actually sees when he envisions the Trinity in his/her head...
To say that He literally sits to the right of the Father
Now my bible doesn't say that...That would imply 2 personages...And maybe, maybe not...
My bible says Jesus sits AT the right hand of the Father...NOT to the right of the Father...Is there a difference??? Could be...
The way I see it is that there is ONE Throne in heaven for ONE God...Could be Jesus sits on the same Throne as the Father (You have seen me so you have seen the Father)...
It makes no sense at all that the entire bible is a metaphor, especially since no one understands the metaphor...And why write a metaphor for everything when it would be just as easy to write the actual truth???
If hell isn't a place, then it is either everywhere or nowhere.
St. John Chrysostom, St. Augustine and St. Gregory The Great all said that hell is a place, but that its location has not been revealed to us.
Remember that the Church teaches that on the Last Day, the souls of the elect will be reunited with their mortal bodies and that the souls of the damned will also be reunited with their mortal bodies.
The bodies of the damned will be located somewhere, and the place where they are located is Hell.
I think ya’ll insult God saying He would actually punish
someone eternally. Its at this point you accuse a loving God of injustice and cruelty.
The Catechism says:
1034
Jesus often speaks of “Gehenna,” of “the unquenchable fire” reserved for those who to the end of their lives refuse to believe and be converted, where both soul and body can be lost.614 Jesus solemnly proclaims that he “will send his angels, and they will gather . . . all evil doers, and throw them into the furnace of fire,”615 and that he will pronounce the condemnation: “Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire!”616
614: Cf. Mt 5:22, 29; 10:28; 13:42, 50; Mk 9:43-48.
615: Mt 13:41-42.
616: Mt 25:41.
“Fire” carries with it the idea that it is located somewhere. Physical fire, that is. Spiritual fire? It may or may not have a physical aspect to it.
Again, I would argue that the doctrine of the resurrection implies that the damned will suffer both physical and spiritual fire.
If Christians don’t have Hell, they have no way to scare people enough to believe. The New Testament, and Jesus therein, talk about it as a place of flaming torture, and Jesus doesn’t seem the least bit offended by it.
I think that the poster who questioned Hell being described as a place is questioning the use of a physical term being applied to a metaphysical condition.
I don’t even know if that is the correct terminology. I just clicked on this thread because I was waiting for someone to make fun of Rudy Giuliani for being a Catholic and ask whether or not he was going to Hell.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.