Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why I, as a former Mormon, would not vote for Mitt Romney for President [PLEASE KEEP IT CIVIL!]
Christian Worldview Network ^ | 6/11/7 | Rauni Higley with Andrew Longman

Posted on 06/11/2007 8:06:18 AM PDT by ZGuy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161 next last
To: TheSuaveOne
Sorry, I stopped reading when the author made the claim that there are “blood oaths” that we “Temple Mormons” are required to make. It’s silly lies like this that show some peoples religious bigotry. Sorry folks, but that is a lie, there are no secret “blood oaths”

I think the key part of the article that is a relevant question re: blood oaths is this part:

Mitt Romney’s grandfather swore an oath against the United States of America. The oath said, “You and each of you do covenant and promise that you will pray and never cease to pray to Almighty God to avenge the blood of the prophets upon this nation, that you will teach the same to your children and to your children’s children unto the third and fourth generation.”

Since the above oath was part of the temple endowment procdure until Feb. 15, 1927...did Mitt's grandfather and/or great-grandfather swear this oath? Is not Mitt part of that "third or fourth generation"?

Note this statement by John D. Lee: “Brigham raised his hand and said, ‘I swear by the eternal Heavens that I have unsheathed my sword, and I will never return it until the blood of the Prophet Joseph and Hyrum, and those who were slain in Missouri, is avenged. This whole nation is guilty of shedding their blood, by assenting to the deed, and holding its peace.’ ... Furthermore, every one who had passed through their endowments, in the Temple, were placed under the most sacred obligations to avenge the blood of the Prophet, whenever an opportunity offered, and to teach their children to do the same, thus making the entire Mormon people sworn and avowed enemies of the American nation.” (Mormonism Unveiled, 1877, p. 160)

61 posted on 06/11/2007 9:36:43 AM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

LOL, gotta love when all that is used against us, are a bunch of anti-mormon books and websites. Kinda like the liberals using the MSM as their sources for truth.

*claps*


62 posted on 06/11/2007 10:17:29 AM PDT by TheSuaveOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder

We have a catholic majority on the supreme court so who cares?


63 posted on 06/11/2007 10:22:33 AM PDT by x_plus_one (As long as we pretend to not be fighting Iran in Iraq, we can't pretend to win the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG
Muslim like Barrack Obama

Um, Obama is a member of United Church of Christ, not a Muslim denomination last time I checked.
64 posted on 06/11/2007 10:40:06 AM PDT by Mr. Know It All (Term Limits: Stop us before we vote again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
As an Arminian In Name Only (AIMO)

Must be an early morning for you. That would be AINO.

Have another cup of coffee and try again.

65 posted on 06/11/2007 10:41:17 AM PDT by Calvinist_Dark_Lord ((I have come here to kick @$$ and chew bubblegum...and I'm all outta bubblegum! ~Roddy Piper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

...and yes, i missed your subsequent post...CDL heads for the coffee pot...


66 posted on 06/11/2007 10:43:17 AM PDT by Calvinist_Dark_Lord ((I have come here to kick @$$ and chew bubblegum...and I'm all outta bubblegum! ~Roddy Piper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: TheSuaveOne
LOL, gotta love when all that is used against us, are a bunch of anti-mormon books and websites

Well, certainly there are many shades of the Pratt-McLean story, depending upon whom you cite. (I think the one thing they all agree on was that Eleanor McLean was separated from her husband, Hector, but not divorced). Also, most historians, LDS & otherwise, do link the Pratt murder as one of the escalating factors of Southern Utah Mormons to distrust--or avenge--a wagon train party from Arkansas.

As for the blood oath as being part of the LDS temple ceremonies doesn't need "anti-Mormon" sources:

“... omit from the prayer circle all reference to avenging the blood of the prophets.” (Apostle George F. Richards, Apostle, 2/15/1927, as cited by John Buerger, “The Development of the Mormon Temple Endowment Ceremony,” Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought, Winter 1987, v. 20, no. 4, p. 55).

All you have to do is read the U.S. Senate history of the confirmation of LDS apostle Reed Smoot as senator & you'll see that this oath was part of the investigation into accepting Smoot.

67 posted on 06/11/2007 10:45:40 AM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
I believe that God is going to choose our leaders for us and that we are going to assent to God's will in that choice by voting appropriately.

...

...I voted for was Jimmy Carter.

May God forgive me for that one.


Why wouldn't He? Didn't you say that God chose Jimmy Carter? ;-) Personally, I believe that God doesn't get involved in human politics. That's why we much act on our own faith and values and vote accordingly — if God's plan is not put in place on this Earth, it's our fault, not His. That said, I have no problem with Romney due to his Morman faith (full disclosure, I am Catholic).

(More full disclosure, I wasn't old enough to vote for or against Carter, so I'm not judging you!)
68 posted on 06/11/2007 10:49:21 AM PDT by Mr. Know It All (Term Limits: Stop us before we vote again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Know It All; Calvinist_Dark_Lord
Didn't you say that God chose Jimmy Carter?

Indeed he did. Undoubtedly he was not happy with the USA at that point. It appears that he cursed us with Carter so that we would repent and vote for Reagan.

Personally, I believe that God doesn't get involved in human politics.

Then I guess you either 1) have not read the Bible, or 2) don't believe the Bible. That's not unusual.

That's why we much act on our own faith and values and vote accordingly — if God's plan is not put in place on this Earth, it's our fault, not His.

I sense you are a Deist. I also sense that you believe that God does not know the future, that he has no control over his own plans, and that he is as surprised by current events as we are. That, IMO, is pretty a frightening theological worldview. If God is not intervening is politics and controlling the destiny of the earth, then quite frankly it would appear that we are doomed.

full disclosure, I am Catholic

Is this verse in the Catholic bible?

The king's heart is in the hand of the LORD, as the rivers of water: he turneth it whithersoever he will. (Proverbs 21:1 KJV)

God is in control.

Thank God.

.

Opinions expressed above are those of the poster and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Free Republic, the Religion Moderator, the poster's church, or God.

69 posted on 06/11/2007 11:07:31 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

What merits?

I disagree very strongly with Mormon theology. But this article is a bit over the top. If elected Romney will take an oath to uphold the Constitution. Unless proven otherwise I will believe he would not run for office if he could not honestly keep that oath.

I also thought that the blood oaths of the temple endowment ended in the 60’s. I invite any LDS tell me if this is true.

And comparing the attacks of 2001 by Muslim fanatics to the Mountain Meadow Massacre is very low. I am not defending the massacre it was horrid. But since no such attacks ever occurred again I think we can safely conclude that it was an isolated incident condemned by LDS. Besides the real motive was most likely not religious but larcenous. The train contained extremely valuable thorougbred horses which certain LDS members coveted.


70 posted on 06/11/2007 11:50:17 AM PDT by lastchance (Hug your babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
Those are, more or less, the reasons I won't vote for him either. As governor of Massachusetts, he's proven himself to be a first-class RINO.

Oh, that sounds woefully uninformed. How many RINOs do you know who do things like this:

He vetoed the bill providing state funding for human embryonic stem cell research

He vetoed a bill that provided for the "morning after pill" without a prescription because it is an abortifacient and would have been available to minors without parental notification and consent

He vetoed legislation which would have redefined Massachusetts longstanding definition of the beginning of human life from fertilization to implantation

Governor Romney strongly supported a successful ballot initiative that replaced the state's bilingual program with English immersion. (Romney Vows to Protect English Immersion Law, May 1, 2003)

Governor Romney demonstrated his commitment to school-choice by vetoing a bill that would have canceled funding for Massachusetts' charter-school program. (Romney to Veto Charter School Moratorium, June 23, 2004)

He supported parental notification laws and opposed efforts to weaken parental involvement

He fought to promote abstinence education in public school classrooms with a program offered by faith-based Boston group Healthy Futures to middle school students.

In the four balanced budgets he signed into law, Governor Romney used the line-item veto or program reduction power to cut spending by nearly $1 Billion.

Over the course of four budgets, Governor Romney made over 300 line-item reductions, 350 line-item eliminations and struck language 150 times

Gov. Romney was instrumental in passing a bill abolishing a retroactive capital gains tax in the state that would have forced nearly 50,000 taxpayers to pay an additional $200 million in state taxes and fees

YOU DON'T KNOW MITT.

71 posted on 06/11/2007 11:59:38 AM PDT by redgirlinabluestate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Undoubtedly he was not happy with the USA at that point.

Either that or the electorate was not happy with the Republicans. It might have something to do with that Nixon guy resigning in disgrace. But what do I know? I can't claim a lack of doubt when it comes to what is in the mind of God.

Tell, me P-Marlowe, does the candidate you vote for always win? Did you vote for Clinton? Because God "obviously" wanted him in office for eight years. How come you and millions of other Christians were so far removed from God's will that you didn't see that?

I sense you are a Deist. I also sense that you believe that God does not know the future, that he has no control over his own plans, and that he is as surprised by current events as we are. That, IMO, is pretty a frightening theological worldview. If God is not intervening is politics and controlling the destiny of the earth, then quite frankly it would appear that we are doomed.

Then we're doomed.

I can see why you might think I was a Deist, but I'm not. I'm a Catholic who believes in free will. Without free will there is no sin, and without sin, no one needs to read the Bible. If God knows what we're going to do, why does He bother giving us advice?

I don't know whether or not our decisions, including who we vote for, are "surprises" to God; I am not arrogant enough to claim knowledge of the mind of God beyond what He reveals.

The king's heart is in the hand of the LORD, as the rivers of water: he turneth it whithersoever he will. (Proverbs 21:1 KJV)

You accused me of not reading the Bible. This is what it says in the Bible:

פלגי־מים לב־מלך ביד־יהוה על־כל־אשר יחפץ יטנו

(I know if may come as a shock to you that King James didn't write the Bible and it wasn't originally in English.) In this sentence, the verb "to be" is implied. The clear implication of this construction is that were talking about a hypothetical state of being, i.e. if the King places his heart in the hands of God, then God can take control of it. The rest of the chapter goes on in further detail about the folly of not following what you know to be God's will in your heart. In other words, you are responsible for applying God's will to the best of your ability. If you vote Adolph Hitler into office, then that's your failure to search your heart for God's Truth, not God's decision that Hitler should be in power (seriously, would God have put Hitler in power?! Give our Lord a little credit here!).
72 posted on 06/11/2007 12:50:46 PM PDT by Mr. Know It All (Term Limits: Stop us before we vote again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry

Who is the prophet?


73 posted on 06/11/2007 1:00:47 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy (Hillary '08...Her Phoniness is Genuine!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy; colorcountry
Who is the prophet?

Whoever the current "living prophet" is, that presides over the LDS church at that time. I believe that person is still Gordon B. Hinckley.


74 posted on 06/11/2007 1:11:32 PM PDT by Alex Murphy (FR Member Alex Murphy: Declared Anathema By The Council Of Trent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

It is. President Hinckley is still alive and kicking, at almost 97 years of age.


75 posted on 06/11/2007 1:16:44 PM PDT by Choose Ye This Day (If you don't have borders, you don't have a nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

I’m an ex-Mormon too, and sorry, this guy is full of crap. I’d vote for Romney in a heartbeat over Hillary or any other Democrat, thanks.


76 posted on 06/11/2007 1:18:28 PM PDT by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
Generations of Romney’s forefathers swearing blood-vengeance against the United States of America?

What a load of unadulterated guano. That "oath" was nothing of the kind. There was no vengeance sworn against the country. Vengeance was sworn against the cowardly murderers who mobbed together and killed Joseph and Hyrum Smith in cold blood, spilling their blood upon the ground of this nation.

The murderers of the Smith brothers died long, long ago. This author is a liar, a distorter, and has a personal axe to grind against the Church. Once again, he proves that many of those who leave the Church are incapable of leaving it alone.

77 posted on 06/11/2007 1:39:59 PM PDT by Choose Ye This Day (If you don't have borders, you don't have a nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
why is this under religion topics? It’s news worthy since it addresses one of the top three running for prez! Can you get it moved.

Good article, thanks. I did learn a bit about Mormonism. know.

78 posted on 06/11/2007 3:58:43 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

Never mind - I see it was moved here by the religion moderator. Strange.


79 posted on 06/11/2007 4:01:50 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #80 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson