Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 07/14/2007 1:07:11 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:

flamewar



Skip to comments.

Pope's Anti-Protestant Diatribe Signed for Pope by Sex Molestation Advocate, Cardinal Levada!
Bloggers & Personal ^ | 12 Jul 07 | Xzins

Posted on 07/12/2007 6:25:21 PM PDT by xzins

In an act of jaw-dropping hubris, Pope Benedict Joseph Ratzinger recently declared Protestantism's churches "not true churches." In an effort to underscore the wisdom of such a position at this time, he then had his "document" signed by none other than Cardinal William Levada, a pro-gay, pro-pedophile, pro-molestation cleric hailing recently from San Francisco and Portland. Apparently hypocrisy is in abundant supply in the Vatican larder.

Levada is one of the papal appointments that causes either great puzzlement about (or gives great insight into) this Pope's orientation. Fresh off of scandals in his previous appointments, Levada received one of the Vatican's highest appointments to the post previously held by Benedict himself before his own ascension to the papacy. One of the most powerful positions in all of Catholicism, the Vatican’s “Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith” is Levada's launching pad to spread his peculiar influence to the remainder of the church. He seems just the guy a conservative church leader like Ratzinger would think of when puzzling the question, “Who should I have teach the people about Jesus?”

In having Levada sign this negative document rejecting Protestant churches and ministers, the Pope has displayed either blind incompetence or unbelievable hypocrisy. Others think he simply might not have been sleeping well…..for a long, long, long time.

William Donohue, head of the conservative Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights is on record castigating Cardinal Levada for blaming the female victim who was impregnated by one of Levada's randy underlings. At the time, Levada’s position was that the lady should have used “protection.” (Could Nancy Pelosi have said it better?)

Donohue's take was that the statement was no different than saying 'What's wrong with you, honey, aren't you smart enough to make sure condoms were used?' "

The Los Angeles Times, no conservative paper, had listed Levada among the area's most powerful gay-friendly Catholic leaders.

See links below


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: baselessopinion; bitterness; defect; donotbanpopebashers; fascinatedwcatholics; gramsci; homosexualagenda; levada; molestation; moralabsolutes; notthiscrapagain; pope; priest; protestants; revisionism; whereisyourlitany
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 851-875 next last
Pope: Some Christian Denominations Not True Churches

LORENZAGO DI CADORE, Italy - Pope Benedict XVI has reasserted the universal primacy of the Roman Catholic Church, approving a document released Tuesday that says Orthodox churches were defective and that other Christian denominations were not true churches.

(snip)

The document, signed by the congregation (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) prefect, U.S. Cardinal William Levada, was approved by Benedict on June 29, the feast of Sts. Peter and Paul - a major ecumenical feast day.

Homosexual Activists Cheer Appointment of New San Francisco Archbishop (to Replace Levada)By Hilary White

The LA Times wrote that the “trail of abuse” in the Los Angeles Archdiocese and its surrounding area dioceses “leads inevitably” to St. John’s. According to the Times, 10% of St. John's ordinands for Los Angeles from 1950 to ‘65 have been accused of molesting minors. In two classes, 1966 and 1972, a third of the graduates were later accused of molestation.

The group of bishops includes Roger Cardinal Mahony the Archbishop of Los Angeles who has been praised by the homosexual activist group, the Rainbow Sash Movement, for his support for their cause; Patrick Ziemann, the disgraced former bishop of Santa Rosa who was dismissed from his diocese after sex abuse allegations from one of his own priests and Tod Brown, bishop of LA’s neighbouring diocese of Orange whose letters and instructions to priests on homosexual issues have been called “confusing” and whose diocese has been used to house a number of notorious homosexual abusers.

Perhaps the most prominent member of the group is Archbishop William Levada, formerly of the now-bankrupt Portland diocese and lately of San Francisco whom Niederauer will be succeeding. Levada’s appointment by Pope Benedict XVI as head of the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith – making Levada among the three most powerful prelates in the Church – came as a shock to many Catholics aware of the problems stemming from Los Angeles.

Jim Bretzke, chairman of the theology department at the University of San Francisco, told the San Francisco Chronicle that Niederauer’s appointment, “rather than someone more doctrinaire or conservative,” is evidence of Levada’s power in Rome.

Rescind the Appointment at Once by Thomas A. Droleskey

Many of us have expressed our reservations concerning the appointment of the former ordinary of the Archdiocese of San Francisco, the Most Reverend William Levada, to be Pope Benedict XVI's successor as the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. The resurfacing of a report from 1994 makes it imperative for Pope Benedict to rescind this appointment at once.

Apart from the ways in which Archbishop Levada protected priests who were inclined to the persistent commission of perverse sins against the Sixth and Ninth Commandment (see Generating Controversy and Negative Press on this website), His Excellency permitted court papers to be filed under his name when he was the Archbishop of Portland, Oregon, in 1994, that placed the blame on a woman who had been impregnated by an archdiocesan seminarian (and was seeking child support from the archdiocese) for not having "protected" herself from the consequences of her behavior with the seminarian (now a priest). Here is the report on the matter that appeared in the August 3, 2005, edition of the Los Angeles Times:

Faithful Furious Over Tactic

Catholics express shock over lawyer's arguments that a woman who sued Portland archdiocese for child support should have used birth control.

By William Lobdell, Times Staff Writer

In 1994, then-Archbishop of Portland William Levada offered a simple answer for why the archdiocese shouldn't have been ordered to pay the costs of raising a child fathered by a church worker at a Portland, Ore., parish.

In her relationship with Arturo Uribe, then a seminarian and now a Whittier priest, the child's mother had engaged "in unprotected intercourse … when [she] should have known that could result in pregnancy," the church maintained in its answer to the lawsuit.

The legal proceeding got little attention at the time. And the fact that the church — which considers birth control a sin — seemed to be arguing that the woman should have protected herself from pregnancy provoked no comment. Until last month.

That's when Stephanie Collopy went back into court asking for additional child support. A Times article reported the church's earlier response. Now liberal and conservative Catholics around the country are decrying the archdiocese's legal strategy, saying it was counter to church teaching.

"On the face of it, [the argument] is simply appalling," said Michael Novak, a conservative Catholic theologian and author based in Washington, D.C.

That the "unprotected intercourse" argument was offered in Levada's name made it especially shocking to some Catholics. The former archbishop is now chief guardian of Catholic doctrine worldwide. The archbishop's new post as prefect of the Vatican's Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith was last held by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger — now Pope Benedict XVI.

William Donohue, president of the conservative Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights based in New York, said the legal language was "simply code for, 'What's wrong with you, honey, aren't you smart enough to make sure condoms were used?' "

And that, he notes, is completely counter to the church's teachings, which hold that using contraceptives is "intrinsically evil."


1 posted on 07/12/2007 6:25:23 PM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; Alex Murphy; Gamecock; Frumanchu; blue-duncan; BibChr; fortheDeclaration; ...

ping


2 posted on 07/12/2007 6:26:56 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; jude24; LiteKeeper

ping


3 posted on 07/12/2007 6:37:58 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Cardinal William Levada, a pro-gay, pro-pedophile, pro-molestation cleric hailing recently from San Francisco and Portland. Apparently hypocrisy is in abundant supply in the Vatican larder.

Giving true meaning of the old saying, birds of a feather.

4 posted on 07/12/2007 6:44:03 PM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
For a group of people who don’t care what the Pope says they seem to care alot about what the Pope says.
5 posted on 07/12/2007 6:49:59 PM PDT by escapefromboston (manny ortez: mvp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Birds of a feather...

BirdCage??

Amazing stuff...this odd appointment and spokesman???


6 posted on 07/12/2007 6:51:20 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: escapefromboston; Dr. Eckleburg; P-Marlowe

Luther wasn’t famous for sitting back and taking it.


7 posted on 07/12/2007 6:53:11 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xzins

THE POPE IS CATHOLIC?!


8 posted on 07/12/2007 6:55:36 PM PDT by Mr. Know It All (Term Limits: Stop us before we vote again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Ya I guess you’re right, this guy should stop being Catholic and join another church then.


9 posted on 07/12/2007 6:57:29 PM PDT by escapefromboston (manny ortez: mvp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Know It All

What denomination is Cardinal Levada?


10 posted on 07/12/2007 6:58:01 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: escapefromboston

Whatever Levada has, it has taken him to the top of his chosen denomination....the RCC.


11 posted on 07/12/2007 6:59:12 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Huh? I was referring to the guy who wrote this article. Either way thanks for adding the “...” it made the sentence.....more dramatic.
12 posted on 07/12/2007 7:02:53 PM PDT by escapefromboston (manny ortez: mvp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Protestants call Catholics idoloters, part of a cult and not Christian.

I think I’d rather have my church called “wounded” than any of those. Read the actual document, btw. It states that the Orthodox are true churches but wounded, the Protestants, wounded more. But it’s easier to listen to Satan use the MSM to divide us more.


13 posted on 07/12/2007 7:04:19 PM PDT by netmilsmom (To attack one section of Christianity in this day and age, is to waste time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: escapefromboston

I got it in a class on internet chatrooms, bulletin boards, discussion rooms, etc.

Really helpful.....”worth the money”


14 posted on 07/12/2007 7:07:12 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: xzins

....awesome!


15 posted on 07/12/2007 7:08:09 PM PDT by escapefromboston (manny ortez: mvp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
The article says: "approving a document released Tuesday that says Orthodox churches were defective and that other Christian denominations were not true churches. "
16 posted on 07/12/2007 7:09:06 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

No actually, it give the true meaning to “Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.”

If Levada had retired, he would have been on book tours and the news spouting crap. B16 kept him under Vatican control. How many retired Bishops or Priests have you heard slamming the Catholic Church? Lots, I bet.

If you want to see evil, you will but there is a method to the madness.


17 posted on 07/12/2007 7:09:10 PM PDT by netmilsmom (To attack one section of Christianity in this day and age, is to waste time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

Or....

He promoted him.


18 posted on 07/12/2007 7:10:28 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: xzins

You quoted the article. But, does the article quote the official document?


19 posted on 07/12/2007 7:12:17 PM PDT by Petronski (imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: xzins

>>The article says: “approving a document released Tuesday that says Orthodox churches were defective and that other Christian denominations were not true churches<<

Exactly! The ARTICLE said. Have you read the document or just the spin.

When the media reports the Pope said something, it’s Gospel Truth. When the media reports Bush said something, we are all asking for documentation.

Trusting the MSM is foolish.


20 posted on 07/12/2007 7:12:53 PM PDT by netmilsmom (To attack one section of Christianity in this day and age, is to waste time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Or....

He held him under check.


21 posted on 07/12/2007 7:13:44 PM PDT by netmilsmom (To attack one section of Christianity in this day and age, is to waste time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
To attack one section of Christianity in this day and age, is to waste time.

To attack one section of Christianity in this day and age, is to express jealousy and/or hate.

22 posted on 07/12/2007 7:18:35 PM PDT by Petronski (imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom; Petronski

Sure. It says were defective groups that aren’t really churches.

Surprisingly, that doesn’t really work for me.


23 posted on 07/12/2007 7:23:04 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Correction: “It says WE’RE...”


24 posted on 07/12/2007 7:24:03 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I love living in a time and place where the Pope is free to sign off on silly statements and you and others are free to argue against them and I'm free to worship as I choose. Hallelujah.

I think that gets lost sometimes in all the arguing... we can! Baruch Hashem!

25 posted on 07/12/2007 7:24:06 PM PDT by AnnaZ (I keep 2 magnums in my desk.One's a gun and I keep it loaded.Other's a bottle and it keeps me loaded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnnaZ

Adonai


26 posted on 07/12/2007 7:24:46 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom; xzins
Trusting the MSM is foolish.

Hugs, kisses, and Bless Your Heart!

It's absolutely embarassing, the way people have been having conniptions over reporters' paraphrases.

If you want to disagree with what the Pope has said, then disagree with what the Pope has said, not some idiot, leftist, anti-Christian reporter's summary.

27 posted on 07/12/2007 7:26:40 PM PDT by Tax-chick ("A dependence on mass immigration is always a structural weakness and should be understood as such.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Praise Adonai. From the rising of the sun to the end of every day.

= )

28 posted on 07/12/2007 7:26:52 PM PDT by AnnaZ (I keep 2 magnums in my desk.One's a gun and I keep it loaded.Other's a bottle and it keeps me loaded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Comment #29 Removed by Moderator

To: xzins

Oh, absolutely, honey. Every single one of us. Aren’t you ... or are you perfect today?


30 posted on 07/12/2007 7:32:51 PM PDT by Tax-chick ("A dependence on mass immigration is always a structural weakness and should be understood as such.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: xzins
It says were defective groups that aren’t really churches.

First, I'll give you a dollar if you diagram that 'sentence.'

Second, produce a quote or stand guilty of violations of the 8th commandment.

31 posted on 07/12/2007 7:34:02 PM PDT by Petronski (imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Correction: “It says WE’RE...”

Ahhh, that helps a little.

Where's the quote to the effect of your words.

32 posted on 07/12/2007 7:34:46 PM PDT by Petronski (imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: xzins
>>Sure. It says were defective groups that aren’t really churches.<<

Where? Where is the exact quote from the Vatican document?
Overcome your Catholic disgust and give us a reference.

33 posted on 07/12/2007 7:36:12 PM PDT by netmilsmom (To attack one section of Christianity in this day and age, is to waste time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: american colleen; Aquinasfan; B Knotts; BlackElk; Blue Eyes; Campion; Chi-townChief; Cicero; ...
Ring

(If you would like to be on/off my Catholic Ring List, please send a Freepmail.)

34 posted on 07/12/2007 7:36:48 PM PDT by Barnacle (The Emperor has no clothes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Thanks Lady!

I’ve been amazed at the foaming at the mouth of some FReepers without ever using the actual words of the document.

Who was it that posted the link before with the actual words from the Vatican?


35 posted on 07/12/2007 7:41:02 PM PDT by netmilsmom (To attack one section of Christianity in this day and age, is to waste time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Barnacle; Salvation; NYer; Desdemona; AnAmericanMother; Campion; BlackElk; Tantumergo; ...

Battle Cry!


36 posted on 07/12/2007 7:41:44 PM PDT by StAthanasiustheGreat (Vocatus Atque Non Vocatus Deus Aderit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick; Religion Moderator

I responded to the instruction to say what the document says and not what the media is saying. The document says that protestant churches and pastors are “Defective.” It is interesting that the Relig Mod considered “defective” so egregious that he had to remove the comment.

Now. Would you like to argue that calling someone “defective” is a positive thing?

My previous comment:

That is the context of asking the following:

What’s not to understand?

Are you or your children defective?


37 posted on 07/12/2007 7:42:10 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
Who was it that posted the link before with the actual words from the Vatican?

I don't know, but it's on Zenit. I need to print it out, and the Motu Proprio on the Latin Mass, too.

38 posted on 07/12/2007 7:43:00 PM PDT by Tax-chick ("A dependence on mass immigration is always a structural weakness and should be understood as such.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Do you even know what the Church (Roman Catholic Church) implies by Church?

I’ll give you a hint, it doesn’t concern their membership and part in the Salvation of Jesus Christ.


39 posted on 07/12/2007 7:43:19 PM PDT by StAthanasiustheGreat (Vocatus Atque Non Vocatus Deus Aderit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I’m defective, I’m I sinner. How about you?


40 posted on 07/12/2007 7:43:42 PM PDT by netmilsmom (To attack one section of Christianity in this day and age, is to waste time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Do you even understand what the Church document is saying. My guess is no, based on your repeated comments. Is the Pope saying Protestants aren’t Christians? That the Orthodox aren’t Christians? NO. Perhaps that is said by some Protestants about Catholics and Orthodox, but that is not what the Pope is saying about Protestants. Read the actual document, not a blog about it.


41 posted on 07/12/2007 7:44:45 PM PDT by StAthanasiustheGreat (Vocatus Atque Non Vocatus Deus Aderit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

I am very defective as well. Thank God for His Grace, for Christ His Son, and for His Church (The Church of Christ built on Peter).


42 posted on 07/12/2007 7:45:42 PM PDT by StAthanasiustheGreat (Vocatus Atque Non Vocatus Deus Aderit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: xzins; Religion Moderator

The link you provided with this title starts off this way:

By Hilary White

SAN FRANCISCO, December 22, 2005 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Archbishop George Hugh Niederauer, soon to be installed as the new Archbishop of San Francisco, has told a local news outlet that he is opposed to the Vatican’s prohibition of homosexuals in seminaries.

I don’t understand why your article starts off differently.

What is your purpose in posting a false post?


43 posted on 07/12/2007 7:46:03 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

I think this article is about the messenger the Pope used to deliver his diatribe against Protestants.

Senility must be having an early onset at #1 Vatican Boulevard


44 posted on 07/12/2007 7:48:46 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Isn’t the word “wounded” not defective?


45 posted on 07/12/2007 7:49:17 PM PDT by netmilsmom (To attack one section of Christianity in this day and age, is to waste time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: xzins
The document says that protestant churches and pastors are “Defective.”

I see you've only one word in quotes. Please go to the document, available on Zenit, and provide a paragraph, so that we can have a realistic discussion with context.

Anyway, I agreed. We are all defective. Anoreth is growth-hormone deficient. Bill is hyperactive. Tom and Pat are autism-spectrum. Elen and Sally haven't learned their math facts. James is three, and Vlad, although he started out Incredibly Perfect, has now turned Shrieky. And I drink too much and have fat thighs.

I could go into our character flaws, too, but I don't want to bore everyone.

Sorry, FRiend. If you think you were born perfect and wearing the latest style hat, you've missed the Gospel.

46 posted on 07/12/2007 7:49:19 PM PDT by Tax-chick ("A dependence on mass immigration is always a structural weakness and should be understood as such.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

Who knows? Go to Zenit and copy us the relevant paragraphs :-).


47 posted on 07/12/2007 7:49:57 PM PDT by Tax-chick ("A dependence on mass immigration is always a structural weakness and should be understood as such.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom; Tax-chick

I heard that one of the proofreaders on the primacy statement once dressed in drag during a fraternity stunt!

Burn him!


48 posted on 07/12/2007 7:50:43 PM PDT by Petronski (imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; Religion Moderator

If you will read the article that leads this thread, you will see that I wrote it, and that this is the “Bloggers and Personal” section of Free Republic.

I wrote the article.

I wrote the title.

There are links provided at post #1.


49 posted on 07/12/2007 7:50:56 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: xzins

You’re still not getting it are you?


50 posted on 07/12/2007 7:51:12 PM PDT by netmilsmom (To attack one section of Christianity in this day and age, is to waste time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 851-875 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson