Skip to comments.Italy's Padre Pio 'faked his stigmata with acid'
Posted on 10/25/2007 9:24:05 AM PDT by NYer
click here to read article
In other words, you ask for intercessory prayer because you see it being done in the Scriptures, but it nevertheless contradicts your theology.
Christ can be our mediator and we can pray to Him because He is ALIVE. He died, and was risen to life immortal. We do not pray to a dead person when we pray to Christ!
Again, the bottom line is that you don't really believe that the dead in Christ are as alive as he is, even though he says they are.
Jesus is not violating anything if He talks to the dead. Jesus is God. You write as if you do not even understand this simple Christian concept. Jesus cannot ever do anything wrong or that is against His Word (He is the Word in the flesh) and will never do anything that isnot in unison with the Father or the Holy Spirit.
Jesus has the power to bring the dead to life. He has the power to show that He is talking with Moses and Elijah, no doubt to whom He would have been able to talk to in Heaven anyway. Normal human beings do not have these powers. Normal human beings are told NOT to talk to the dead and to NOT get involved with those who do.
Certainly so, but I would also call it 'intense'.
So did the Apostles.
He has the power to show that He is talking with Moses and Elijah, no doubt to whom He would have been able to talk to in Heaven anyway. Normal human beings do not have these powers. Normal human beings are told NOT to talk to the dead and to NOT get involved with those who do.
Jesus was setting a bad example, and we shouldn't get involved with him?
Okay you want to get hung up on a definition to somehow justify talking to the dead.
necromancy: conjuration of the spirits of the dead for purposes of magically revealing the future or influencing the course of events.
necromancy: 1. prediction using spirits: the practice of attempting to communicate with the spirits of the dead in order to predict or influence the future.
“INFLUENCING THE COURSE OF EVENTS.” What do you think you are trying to do with a prayer? You are asking for something from the dead (intercession/mediation), and trying to influence the course of events.
My most sincere condolences on your loss.
Just as Campion said, you fail to accept the fact that these faithful "dead" are actually alive in Christ.
When we pray to God for something, are we "trying to influence the course of events"? In a sense, we are doing that with certain prayers. None of these saints have any power of their own other than their prayer. God does the heavy lifting.
My condolensces, tiki. Rest assured of my prayers for you, her and all your family. May she rest in peace.
Okay. Was Jesus practicing necromancy at the Transfiguration?
Jesus, being God Almighty can talk to anyone He wants to. And they were face to face. He was not praying to them for intercession.
No New Testament saint or Old Testament saint prayed to the dead.
Once again, Jesus is the only mediator and intercessor between God and man. If you deviate from that, you are in error.
You Catholics are saying that praying to Jesus is to no effect. We have to get Mary or somebody else to ask Jesus to do something we are asking.
If you are in Christ, you don't need any other intercessor. Are you a child of God or not?
You're acting like Jesus doesn't care unless Mary asks Him so. That is blaspheme.
Wow, you really need some help untwisting Scripture.
Your first point is just babble. I am saying there is no need to pray to departed (dead) christians who will then shuttle my request to Christ for me, because I can pray directly to Christ. You are incorrectly equating praying to a dead Christian to pray for you or send your prayer up to God for you, with asking a Christian who is alive on the earth that you can talk to and ask to pray for you. They are not the same thing. Unfortunately you don’t realize this. There is no violation. The body of Christ on earth can help each other while on the earth. If you get there’s a disconnect in the ability of a dead human being to help living human beings still on the earth, you really don’t get a very simple concept.
Second point you are distorting what it means to be ‘absent from the body, present with the Lord.” They are in heaven right now, but they have not been resurrected yet, like Christ has. They have not yet received their immortal bodies yet, like Christ has. And forgive me, but they do not have the same powers of Christ. They are not God nor will any of us ever be God. Just because they are alive in heaven does not mean you can say that they can intercede for us.
You still cannot admit there is ONE mediator, Jesus Christ. We need no other. We don’t have to ask anyone else in heaven to do anything for us. They cannot do anything for us anyway.
Being ‘alive in Christ’ does not mean they have the powers of Christ. Or can do everything that Christ can do.
I am alive in Christ right now. I cannot do everything that Christ can do. Paul was alive in Christ. He could do miracles for awhile, until those powers were taken away from him. But Paul could not do everything Christ could do. It is not theologically sound or supportable that from the phrase ‘alive in Christ’ that you come up with the idea that the dead can intercede for us.
Check that pride, did an angel come down and give you the scriptures?
You twist Scripture and take things out of context just to provoke. I feel sad for you.
"What we do not see are examples of anyone teaching or promoting the idea of praying to dead Christians (absent from the body, present with the Lord), so that they in turn can take our prayers to God for us. There is nothing biblical about this. Paul never taught it."
But John did:
And when he had taken it, the four living creatures and the twenty-four elders fell down before the Lamb. Each one had a harp and they were holding golden bowls full of incense, which are the prayers of God's people.
Another angel, who had a golden censer, came and stood at the altar. He was given much incense to offer, with the prayers of all God's people, on the golden altar before the throne. The smoke of the incense, together with the prayers of God's people, went up before God from the angel's hand.
Clearly the citizens of heaven are offering the prayers of all God's people to God.
Surely you believe you are in a state of spiritual interconnection with people you cannot see. Do you stop praying for and with people if you don't have their phone number or their e-mail address? Isn't a fellow-Christian in heaven as close to you, or closer, than one in Passaic NJ?
It seems you believe in a boxed-up, compartmentalized Church, part-dead, part-living, out-of-touch and altogether incommunicado. But Christ teaches us we are all part of His body, utterly beyond the limitations of time and space, and utterly alive.
When you see us all as united in the living Christ, it's really quite beautiful.
They are alive in Christ. Catholics believe as do our non-Catholic Christian friends, that there is only one mediator between God and man and that mediator is Jesus Christ (1 Timothy 2:5). We do believe, however, that there is nothing wrong with having a member of our church pray for us. There are many examples of this in the Bible. Paul asking for prayer, Paul praying for others, and scriptures encouraging us to pray for each other.
Did you even read what I wrote? They have no power other than their prayer. God does the heavy lifting.
There's other biblical support for this. Then again, your "spiritual fathers" centuries ago expunged them.
Gee, I wonder if our elder brothers feel this way about Christians. Since to them Jesus was just another false human prophet... who was slain btw (i’m sure plenty of them didn’t witness the resurrection, Jesus was taking care of business), so to them, we’re using a dead human guy that was a fake. Would you say they were right? How could you prove they weren’t? They would tell you to pray directly to God, why would you use Jesus.
dittos, to all the explanations you received.
"The Lord of the Rings is of course a fundamentally religious and Catholic work; unconsciously so at first, but consciously in the revision."
Padre Pio, like Josemaria Escriva, will always be a polarizing figure. I know in the case of Josemaria, however, the charges are largely ludicrous (”Opus Dei runs the banks!”), to the out and out laughable (such as the “tell all” book by Josemaria’s secretary that accused him of using “foul language” from time to time).
Carbolic acid is a very weak acid. It might cause chapped hands, but it will not induce bleeding.
OTOH it IS used for sterilization.
Your revelation examples are symbolic language. The whole book of revelation has many symbolic passages. It is symbolism. Further your example does not mention any specific dead person by name that the prayers were offered to, only that the prayers are in a bowl being held or moved around by angels or an elder. No names. Symbolic. You need to learn the difference between symbolism and literal language.
Second, the whole do I forget to pray for someone if I don’t have their phone # or email? You’re talking about people who are still alive on the earth that I can actually physically contact in some way.
You fail to understand that there is a divide between the living and the dead. Yes the dead in Christ are part of the Church Universal, but that does not mean that those still alive on the earth can communicate to them as if there were still here in their bodies. Once someone dies, Christian or not, there are certain avenues of communication that no longer work. Being part of the body of Christ does not mean you can access every part of the body of Christ the same way. God’s Word says you don’t try to talk to the dead (those no longer in their physical bodies).
Cmon people it’s not that hard.
If memory serves, St. Maximilian Kolbe was killed by an injection of carbolic acid.
What is your source for these statements of fact?
It seems to me that the argument that communicating with the saints in Heaven is "necromancy," and therefore a sin, contradicts this argument, in which it's claimed that communicating with the saints in Heaven is impossible. I would suggest that the Biblical evidence, presented by others up the thread, supports the contention that communication with the saints (and perhaps with the non-sanctified) is quite possible. After all, why forbid something that's impossible anyway?
"Dead" is just a materialist obfuscation. "All live to Him."
I’m so sorry about your loss, tiki. Your family will be in my prayers.
And how are they different, exactly? I mean apart from special pleading.
The Christian in heaven is freed from sin and enjoying the complete intimate union with God that is only possible in heaven.
The Christian on earth is not yet completely freed from sin and isn't yet enjoying that intimate union with God. And this makes his prayers more efficacious ... because ... ???
They are in heaven right now, but they have not been resurrected yet, like Christ has. They have not yet received their immortal bodies yet, like Christ has.
According to Christ, they're alive. According to you, they're dead.
Who should I believe?
You still cannot admit there is ONE mediator, Jesus Christ. We need no other.
You continue to distort and misunderstand that verse. Read it in context.
What I'm trying to "provoke" is critical thought on your part, about the degree to which your presuppositions contradict Scripture, and even contradict themselves.
"Oh death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory?"
I think we come about our "failure to understand" that "divide" pretty honestly. In fact, we reject it outright.
Look up the meaning of "latria" and "dulia". It's a translation problem.
“My mother passed away this morning...”
God Bless you and your family.
When is the Joyful Mass of the Resurrection? I was thinking at Adoration about an hour ago beautiful our heavenly home must be!
I’ll pray for your mother tonight during rosary.
"All 'his' own perception"; doesn't make it true. He is stating his own opinion, not church doctrine. Mary called God her savior in the Magnificant. She is not the co-Redeemer. She is a sinner saved by grace....and by grace alone.
Yes, because He did so preemptively.
She is not the co-Redeemer.
Nor does the Catholic Church teach that.
She is a sinner saved by grace....and by grace alone.
Nope, she never sinned, though grace touched her life like none other.
Rufus T. Firefly???
Sorry; couldn't resist!
I suspect the point of the original accusation is that he could have been applying it to his hands, creating the burns that would then be considered stigmata. Purchasing it and swearing the seller to secrecy suggests this. But, the lack of burns or scars at death suggests against this.
Not so. It’s a weak acid but a strong corrosive. It can cause serious burns. It’s much more dangerous than its modest pKa suggests.
Prayers going up for peace, tiki.
Hail, Hail Freedonia, land of the free and the brave!
I hope you escaped the effects of the inferno.
Hey and how about this one?
John 3:36 states that he who believes has eternal life.
So what is eternal life if all those people in heaven are dead?
It’s quite curious. It’s kind of like an amalgam of the historical Christian teaching of “communion of Saints” and the very non-historic teaching of “soul sleep”. Very odd.
I got laughed at here and got a Protestant Ping for a pile on because I said that my dear departed mother watches over my children.
It gave me a whole new perspective on “Christian Charity”.
I’ve even met a man who dresses like a Catholic priest just so that he can, well, I’m not sure. But, he doesn’t believe in the Teachings of Christ. Perhaps that’s the desire of taking a name that is solidly Catholic; yet, turning discussions against Catholic Teaching. Perhaps it’s unconscious in this case, or just a real admiration for a Catholic writer.
That is very sad yes; prayers for and God Bless your mother.
Sin is described as violating the law,
54. Q. What is mortal sin?
A. Mortal sin is a grievous offense against the law of God.
57. Q. What is venial sin?
A. Venial sin is a slight offense against the law of Godin matters of less importance; or in matters of great importance it is an offence committed with out sufficient reflection or full consent of the will.
Your church teaches only Jesus "kept the law perfectly"
578 Jesus, Israel's Messiah and therefore the greatest in the kingdom of heaven, was to fulfill the Law by keeping it in its all embracing detail - according to his own words, down to "the least of these commandments".330 He is in fact the only one who could keep it perfectly.
So Mary could NOT have been sinless right?
I found some of the bilocation experiences.
One of the incidents I remember hearing was at Communion a woman was kneeling at the far end of the rail and looked up to see Padre Pio offering the Eucharist, which she took, but she was startled because he was also at the other end of the rail at the same time giving Communion.
The other was the Nazi bombers who were over his town and were frightened to see him in the air, so frightened they turned around and went back to their base.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.