The committee boiled the matter down to nine points. Based on your reading of Wright, which point(s) do you believe specifically apply to him.
BTW, I’m not advocating any position. Just asking how the committee report actually maps to the theology of Wright or Wilkins or Wilson or whomever.
The declarations dealing with justification and perseverance (2, 7, 8, 9) map back to III.B., which deals almost entirely with Wright.
The Declaration on Imputation (5) also seems to track back to there.
The declaration on Baptism (6) tend to point to Wilkin’s writings, and to an extend, Wilson’s and Lusk’s more than directly to Wright.
Someone else can tackle 1, 3, and 4.