Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: PAR35; Dr. Eckleburg; Gamecock

The committee boiled the matter down to nine points. Based on your reading of Wright, which point(s) do you believe specifically apply to him.

BTW, I’m not advocating any position. Just asking how the committee report actually maps to the theology of Wright or Wilkins or Wilson or whomever.


8 posted on 01/10/2008 5:15:09 PM PST by topcat54 ("The selling of bad beer is a crime against Christian love.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: topcat54; Dr. Eckleburg; Gamecock
I’m not going to parse the thing line by line, but some jump out pretty quickly.

The declarations dealing with justification and perseverance (2, 7, 8, 9) map back to III.B., which deals almost entirely with Wright.

The Declaration on Imputation (5) also seems to track back to there.

The declaration on Baptism (6) tend to point to Wilkin’s writings, and to an extend, Wilson’s and Lusk’s more than directly to Wright.

Someone else can tackle 1, 3, and 4.

9 posted on 01/10/2008 6:41:59 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson