Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Religion Forum Guidelines Ecumenism
May 14, 2008 | Religion Moderator

Posted on 05/14/2008 9:06:42 AM PDT by Religion Moderator

In late April, markomalley and gamecock made a trial run at a “respectful dialog” category for threads on the Religion Forum. The trial failed due to the inability of the posters to agree on what is or is not “respectful.” Then in early May, several other posters appealed for the elimination of posts which seek to tear down other poster’s beliefs (iconoclasm.)

Meanwhile, the situation on the Religion Forum has been exacerbated by posters on the News/Activism forum inadvertently being exposed to religious debate as a result of choosing the “everything” option on browse instead of the “News/Activism” option.

If you are offended that conservatives have serious religious disagreements, do not use the “everything” browse option. If you are new to the Religion Forum, click on my profile page for guidelines.

In response to the pleas for a “respectful dialog” and/or the elimination of “iconoclasm” (attacks on other people’s beliefs) – I’m opening the floor for trial postings of a new type of semi-open thread which we shall call “ecumenic.”

Unlike the caucus threads, any poster could reply to an ecumenic thread. And the article on which an ecumenic thread is based could include contrasts and challenges of other beliefs. However, on the ecumenic thread, the poster must not argue against any other beliefs. He can only argue for what he believes – or ask questions.

While we test this new type of thread, be sure to tag every article so that posters will know when to avoid a thread. The tags during this trial run are “prayer” “devotional” “caucus” “ecumenic” or “open.”

Prayer threads are closed to debate of any kind.

Devotional threads are closed to debate of any kind.

Caucus threads are closed to any poster who is not a member of the caucus. If it says “Catholic Caucus” and you are not Catholic, do not post to the thread. However, if the poster of the caucus welcomes you, I will not boot you from the thread.

Ecumenic threads in this trial run are closed to all “anti” arguments. Posters who try to tear down other’s beliefs – or use subterfuge to accomplish the same goal – are the disrupters on ecumenic threads and will be booted from the thread and/or suspended.

Open threads are a town square – posters may argue for or against beliefs of any kind. They may tear down other's beliefs. They may ridicule, similar to the Smoky Backroom with the exception that a poster must never “make it personal.” Reading minds and attributing motives are forms of “making it personal.” Thin-skinned posters will be booted from “open” threads because in the town square, they are the disrupters.

When you see a post which is inappropriate for an ecumenic thread, ping me. Do not bother the Admin Moderators with an abuse report unless the situation requires immediate attention.


TOPICS: Ecumenism
KEYWORDS: faq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 1,061-1,063 next last
To: NYer; narses

Did you see this?


21 posted on 05/14/2008 9:51:44 AM PDT by netmilsmom (I am Ironmom. (but really made from Gold plated titanium))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator
Whenever I log off my computer and then come back, it always opens up to the everything setting.
I then have to click on News, it doesn't automatically stay on news if I logged off while on the News forum.

Am I doing something wrong?

22 posted on 05/14/2008 9:51:55 AM PDT by JRochelle (Keep sweet means shut up and take it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

I’m not sure that ANYBODY has totally figured out the new system yet.


23 posted on 05/14/2008 9:54:26 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

Am I doing something wrong?

Yes, but I’m sure God knows what it is and will forgive you. :-)


24 posted on 05/14/2008 9:57:23 AM PDT by tiki (True Christians will not deliberately slander or misrepresent others or their beliefs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator

Been here, done this. Found out that religious forums do NOT work, no matter what you do.

Good luck with that.

Check out the religious forums over on Anomalies.net for an example of what happened later.


25 posted on 05/14/2008 9:57:27 AM PDT by Rick.Donaldson (http://www.transasianaxis.com - Please visit for latest on DPRK/Russia/China/et al.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle; John Robinson
Whenever I log off my computer and then come back, it always opens up to the everything setting.

That may be part of the problem.
26 posted on 05/14/2008 9:57:49 AM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator
Caucus threads are closed to any poster who is not a member of the caucus. If it says “Catholic Caucus” and you are not Catholic, do not post to the thread. However, if the poster of the caucus welcomes you, I will not boot you from the thread.

Does this mean that you can now have closed caucuses for people who are "Ex-Catholic" "Ex-Protestant" "Ex-Mormon" or"Ex-Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster", whatever, to discuss such things as "Why I don't believe in the Great Spaghetti Monster Anymore"?

27 posted on 05/14/2008 10:02:35 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator

” He can only argue for what he believes – or ask questions.”

Arguing for what one believes is very good. Too many arguments are not so much what one believes but why one doesn’t believe tenets from another’s faith.

How is asking questions to be moderated? There are certainly loaded questions that would lead to flame wars, i.e., “why don’t you think you are a devil worshipping idolater whose leader is probably the Anti-Christ?”


28 posted on 05/14/2008 10:07:33 AM PDT by OpusatFR (Internet Torquemada of FR. Trip over yourself at your own risk. I don't answer some posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator; Gamecock; Alex Murphy; 1000 silverlings; xzins; P-Marlowe; blue-duncan; ...
However, on the ecumenic thread, the poster must not argue against any other beliefs. He can only argue for what he believes

Respectfully, this "new thread" classification in effect nullifies the very purpose for the Reformation.

If a Catholic thread is posted saying "Mary is the co-Redeemer" (as there have been many already) how is a Protestant supposed to reply with anything other than by the negative "No, Mary is NOT a 'co-redeemer' because according to the Bible, there is ONE only propitiation for our sins, ONE mediator between God and men, ONE Redeemer, Jesus Christ?"

My belief is against that belief. It cannot be otherwise. And what the Catholic doesn't realize is that saying "Mary is a co-redeemer" is offensive to me because we are both considered Christians and yet as a Christian I do not believe that in any way. In fact, that sentence repels me.

Rules like this simply defy the last 500 years of religious history.

Additionally, this "new kind of thread" appears to reward posters who refused to learn how to post within the FR religion forum guidelines. Whining while "making it personal" apparently can pay off.

It seems that the failed "respectful thread" designation has simply morphed into the "ecumenic thread" designation, only this time the penalty for protesting error will be more severe.

29 posted on 05/14/2008 10:08:35 AM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Does this mean that you can now have closed caucuses for people who are "Ex-Catholic" "Ex-Protestant" "Ex-Mormon" or"Ex-Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster", whatever, to discuss such things as "Why I don't believe in the Great Spaghetti Monster Anymore"?

Or does it just mean there is one more "protected" class?

Also, if the RM makes a call on content, what's to stop another mod from coming along later and reversing or changing that call?

30 posted on 05/14/2008 10:08:52 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Plea to mormon FReepers, "DONT HOSE ME, BRO!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
No, a Caucus thread must not compare beliefs or speak for others beliefs, e.g. "ex" whatever.

An "ex" thread can however be posted as Ecumenic, but do not use mocking terms in the tag.

31 posted on 05/14/2008 10:08:52 AM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR

Loading questions in an ecumenic thread is a disruption and the poster will be booted and/or suspended.


32 posted on 05/14/2008 10:10:25 AM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
IMO the more we divide the forum into sub-categories it will eventually devolve into chaos.

Want to take bets that six months from now the "Town Square" dsignation will be dropped entirely as being "too disruptive?"

33 posted on 05/14/2008 10:15:38 AM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
The open threads are the proper format for arguing against others' beliefs.

If a Catholic thread is posted saying "Mary is the co-Redeemer" (as there have been many already) how is a Protestant supposed to reply with anything other than by the negative "No, Mary is NOT a 'co-redeemer' because according to the Bible, there is ONE only propitiation for our sins, ONE mediator between God and men, ONE Redeemer, Jesus Christ?"

You would reply in the "for" - using the last part of your example:

According to the Bible, which I believe is the final authority, there is ONE propitiation for our sins, ONE mediator between God and men, ONE Redeemer, Jesus Christ.


34 posted on 05/14/2008 10:16:28 AM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator
However, on the ecumenic thread, the poster must not argue against any other beliefs. He can only argue for what he believes – or ask questions.

I vow to give it my very best effort whenever taking part.

Always for, never against....very clever.

35 posted on 05/14/2008 10:16:48 AM PDT by Petronski (When there's no more room in hell, the dead will walk the earth, voting for Hillary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR; P-Marlowe
How is asking questions to be moderated? There are certainly loaded questions that would lead to flame wars,

LOL. Well, we'll have to have various sub-sets of questions and we'll have to decide which questions are respectful and which are not.

Good luck with that???

36 posted on 05/14/2008 10:17:59 AM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator
No, a Caucus thread must not compare beliefs or speak for others beliefs, e.g. "ex" whatever.

How about a "Calvinist" caucus open only to Calvinists. Or a "Reformed Caucus" or a GRPL Caucus open only to those who have applied for and been accepted on the GRPL list?

37 posted on 05/14/2008 10:19:00 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

You’re doing better than me. I would gladly choose news only...if I knew where it was. :p

I’ve searched all my links in my account.

Help me......


38 posted on 05/14/2008 10:19:53 AM PDT by Politicalmom (Better a leftist Dem with energized GOP opposition, than a leftist "Republican" with no opposition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; Religion Moderator; Gamecock; Alex Murphy; 1000 silverlings; xzins; P-Marlowe; ...
Respectfully, this "new thread" classification in effect nullifies the very purpose for the Reformation

I've been saying the same thing for a long time: the Reformation is intrinsically a negative movement built in opposition to the Catholic Church and incapable of standing on its own.

39 posted on 05/14/2008 10:20:42 AM PDT by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator
Loading questions in an ecumenic thread is a disruption and the poster will be booted and/or suspended.

Suspended for asking questions?

I don't envy you your job.

40 posted on 05/14/2008 10:20:48 AM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 1,061-1,063 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson