Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 07/18/2008 8:58:08 PM PDT by Religion Moderator, reason:

The priest/pastor sex scandal thread war has stopped. Do not pick at the scab.



Skip to comments.

Don't believe the word of Prostitutes when the slander fits your purpose.
Vanity ^ | 7/18/08 | Dangus

Posted on 07/18/2008 8:53:18 PM PDT by dangus

Should Freepers who call themselves "Christians" believe the word of pimps, as told to them by the mainstream media? The Australian (a newspaper) published the claims of a Syndey pimp who claims that business has increased during World Youth Day. The article notes that up to 5,000 traveling journalists have descended upon Sydney. Of course, we all have heard how the overwhelming majority of journalists are pro-gay, pro-abortion, unchurched, and politically liberal. Plus, incredibly enough, there are armies of protesters. Yet, the article leaves it up to the reader to presume that it's all those Catholic faithful visiting the prostitutes, even though not even the pimp actually states that.

One certain Freeper has undertaken to report the cases of Protestant preachers' sexual abuse cases. My feelings on this tactic are somewhat ambivalent. On the one hand, for the while it lasted, it cast a rather sickening pale across the Freeper religion forum. On the other hand, it was making a valuable point, and the stories were, within reason, true. I'm quite the defender of Catholicism, and I was astounded at the sheer volume of cases this Freeper dug up: several per day, many very shockingly perverse. This wasn't some forty-year backlog, like the Catholic scandals, which had declined 95% a decade before the mainstream media picked up the story in earnest.

And that's what it comes down to: as Freepers, we're supposed to uphold the truth. Lying on a detail in support of what we believe to be a greater truth is still lying. But upholding the truth means so much more than not deliberately lying. It means being responsible for the veracity of what we assert. If a claim is dubious, it doesn't belong on Free Republic just because the commenter isn't positive it's false. If an assertion you've made has been reasonably refuted, don't just repeat it on another thread. If someone has explained to you that you've misunderstood a doctrine, don't proclaim your misunderstanding as doctrine on other threads. If your "greater truth" can't be upheld by these simple rules, the one delighting in your understanding of truth is probably the father of lies.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Evangelical Christian; Mainline Protestant
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 07/18/2008 8:53:18 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson