You wrote:
“Peter took a beating. Agreed. That does little to improve the weakness of Claveau’s article.”
There is no weakness in Claveau’s article. It is simply a brief letter when one considers all the details covered.
“Claveau deserves the beating he received!”
The viciousness of people here is astounding. Clearly this bizarre reaction to his simple letter is purely emotional. It certainly isn’t based on rational thought or any great knowledge of Christianity or evangelization.
“There is no weakness in Claveau’s article.”
Thanks. It was a tough day. You brightened it up with that
comment.
“Clearly this bizarre reaction to his simple letter is purely emotional.”
Love it! Thanks!