Yes, exactly. Note that in #19 Zionist Conspirator begins by inserting a false interpretation of my post in parenthesis, then proceeds to say that the parenthetical part (his) is condemned by the popes.
On the other hand, I was unclear, because I gave an impression that the Bible is divided in inerrant theological part and fallible non-theological part. What I was trying to say was that the apparent error comes from our reading with the mind different from the mind of the inspired author, and is not the revealed divine truth to begin with.
In what way did I misinterpret you? You plainly stated that non-theological matter in the Bible is "not part of revelation."
But pay no attention to me. I'm going to Hell as a punishment for my rebellious "literalism."
Are we really going to rehash our well-known arguments for the blue-millionth time? I've already apologized for getting involved in this thread.