Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: netmilsmom
Dear netmilsmom,

“The documents speak for themselves.”

The documents do speak for themselves, but you haven't shown at all that they say what YOU say they say. In fact, strictly speaking about Canon 1398, it would seem that it does NOT apply to pro-abort politicians.

If you want to assert your position as objective fact, you should at least make some effort to support it with a logical argument on behalf of the assertion.


sitetest

148 posted on 08/26/2008 6:55:15 PM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]


To: sitetest

I did. I posted the documents.


150 posted on 08/26/2008 7:06:16 PM PDT by netmilsmom (The Party of Darkness prefers to have the lights out. - Go Fierce 50!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

To: sitetest

And btw that is

TITLE III.

THE SUBJECT LIABLE TO PENAL SANCTIONS (Cann. 1321 - 1330)

That was linked.


152 posted on 08/26/2008 7:10:00 PM PDT by netmilsmom (The Party of Darkness prefers to have the lights out. - Go Fierce 50!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson