Posted on 09/06/2008 6:29:33 PM PDT by daniel1212
In recent days, Black Liberation Theology has risen to the forefront of our national debate. With the publicity surrounding Barack Obamas former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, and the inflammatory rhetoric with which he speaks, many have come to question the basis for the beliefs of this system.
(Excerpt) Read more at liberty.edu ...
While racism is unBiblical and is to to be abhorred, Black Liberation Theology is the result of having eaten the fruit of lies" (Hos. 10:13), and it's source is no other than the old serpent himself. If we read Gn. 3 carefully, we can see that what the devil sought to do was to foster a victim and entitlement mentality, that Eve was the victim of a uncaring and malevolent moral authority, and thus she was enticed into doing something that seemed to promise gain but in reality would be deleterious to both her (as God had made clear) and that under her influence.
Though unlike Eve, blacks have suffered unjustly, yet much of the culture has been deceived (much by liberal politicians) into accepting a victim and entitlement mentality, in which "garden" out of which a welfare mentality has grown. To their own hurt.
This by no means belittles injustices realized by real victims, but resentment and it's root of bitterness is destructive and contagious.
Israel of old manifested, by their often whining, and rebellion and attribution of malevolent motives to Moses and even God, that they had developed much of a victim mentality in their years of bondage. But which almighty God did not foster, but while He had compassion on them and wrought mighty deliverance and supernatural providence, and gave them an unselfish great leader, yet He disciplined them, sometimes severely (after much long suffering) as needed, and made it manifest that obedience to His commandments was the way to blessing and progress, and not by whining or anarchy.
But the contrary stirring up of resentment and the fostering of a victim mentality and deletrious rebellion is nothing new. Communism depended upon the same. The liberal est. overall fosters such, and depends upon converting others in order to increase their tribe. They basically hold that rebellion against God and His laws are the way to freedom, and that most all who are restrained or punished by such laws are victims (most felons) of an evil moral authority. Instead, they foster the delusion of a paradise where laws regarding sexual behavior, etc., are unneeded, nor should hard work and responsibility - and accountability to transcendent moral absolutes. But as in Communism, the result of this rebellion will not be that of freedom, but of bondage, not that of paradise, but the opposite.
(Psa 9:17) "The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nations that forget God."
bookmark
I always wondered where Jesse and Al got their "I'm-a-victim" sales pitch. What a convenient way to abdicate all responsibilities for your own actions and simply blame everything on whitey. Whatta crock...
And all blacks = victims, and all whites = victimizers, according to the theology.
For 20 years BHO sa under the teachings of Jeremiah Wright:
"The government gives them the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three-strike law and then wants us to sing God Bless America. No, no, no, God damn America, thats in the Bible for killing innocent people. God damn America for treating our citizens as less than human. God damn America for as long as she acts like she is God and she is supreme. (Jeremiah Wright 2003)
And on the political side i wonder why the question of how Obama could belong to a church for 20 years and be “deaf” to the incredibly racist preaching of Wright was not addressed at the GNC.
Let’s see, Obama’s mentor in college was a rabid communist, his pastor was an anti-white racist, and the people who helped launched Obama into politics were admitted terrorists. Either Obama is completely blind or he is a racist, terrorist-supporting commie.
“Therefore, the Supreme Court has recognized that to sustain our constitutional commitment to uninhibited political discourse, the State may not prevent others from “resort{ing} to exaggeration, to vilification of men who have been, or are, prominent in church and state and even to false statement.” Id. (emphasis added). At times such speech seems unpalatable, but the value of free debate overcomes the danger of misuse. McIntyre, 514 U.S. at 357. For even false statements make valuable contributions to debate by bringing about “the clearer and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error.”
In-credible!
(Rom 6:1-2) “What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? {2} God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?”
“Let me close with a repeat from the mouth of Vladimir Ilich Lenin, a real life Twentieth Century destroyer of nations: ‘The lie is sacred, and deception will be our principal weapon.”
I wish to avenge myself against the One who rules above. (Karl Marx)
As is said, consider the source, and who you are really voting for.
And the people, or about half, seem to love to have it so.
(Exo 32:8) “They have turned aside quickly out of the way which I commanded them: they have made them a molten calf, and have worshipped it, and have sacrificed thereunto, and said, These be thy gods, O Israel, which have brought thee up out of the land of Egypt.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.