And so is being retarded.
We DO make such distinctions. There IS intrinsic “good” and “bad”.
But being "retarded" isn't bad because it's abnormal, per se.
We DO make such distinctions. There IS intrinsic good and bad.
Assuming that's true, it misses the point. It's illogical, even nonsensical, to make such distinctions merely (or even at all) on the basis that something is "abnormal," as the examples show. If you want to argue that homosexuality is bad, you have to find a more rational basis for such an argument than the mere fact that it is "abnormal," at least if you want to convince rational people of your position.