Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream; Jim Robinson

It’s more serious than that. Perhaps you didn’t know that you could not post an article on FR with wiki as a source.


44 posted on 01/05/2009 5:03:40 PM PST by Salvation ( †With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Salvation
Do you dispute the facts or do you want to talk about wiki? Until an encyclopedia goes online for free, wiki is the only acceptable source, a lot better than Conservapedia, which is an embarrassment.

I don't defend wiki’s politics or their practices or even their model; but I do know that both of these events took place in history, and I am fairly confident that wiki has the dates and spelling of names correct, while my memory is unreliable for such things.

A poster asked another poster if he could explain ... “Were those bans on personal reading of the Bible or on specific translations? Please document. Can you?”

I sought to enrich the debate by citing factual evidence relevant to the discussion, not get into a debate about the politics or reliability of wikipedia.

45 posted on 01/05/2009 5:43:14 PM PST by allmendream (Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson