Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: kosta50; Forest Keeper; Kolokotronis
To accept "divinely inspired" is to accept "inerrant". Your argument, that the Church gave up on separating the error from truth and instead accepted the Old Testament wholesale out of what? laziness? -- is ahistorical. The Church spent a great effort on defining the Canon and it used every opportunity it had to combat Marcion and his jaunduced view of the Old Testament.

Pope Leo does not espouse the mechanical view, even though he uses the verb "dictated":

... we must remember, first, that the sacred writers, or to speak more accurately, the Holy Ghost "Who spoke by them, did not intend to teach men these things (that is to say, the essential nature of the things of the visible universe), things in no way profitable unto salvation."(53) Hence they did not seek to penetrate the secrets of nature, but rather described and dealt with things in more or less figurative language, or in terms which were commonly used at the time, and which in many instances are in daily use at this day, even by the most eminent men of science. Ordinary speech primarily and properly describes what comes under the senses; and somewhat in the same way the sacred writers-as the Angelic Doctor also reminds us - `went by what sensibly appeared,"(54) or put down what God, speaking to men, signified, in the way men could understand and were accustomed to.

19. The unshrinking defence of the Holy Scripture, however, does not require that we should equally uphold all the opinions which each of the Fathers or the more recent interpreters have put forth in explaining it; for it may be that, in commenting on passages where physical matters occur, they have sometimes expressed the ideas of their own times, and thus made statements which in these days have been abandoned as incorrect. Hence, in their interpretations, we must carefully note what they lay down as belonging to faith, or as intimately connected with faith-what they are unanimous in. For "in those things which do not come under the obligation of faith, the Saints were at liberty to hold divergent opinions, just as we ourselves are,"(55) according to the saying of St. Thomas

What we have here is healthy, critical, balanced view on the nature of divine inspiration.

36 posted on 02/16/2009 8:29:26 PM PST by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: annalex; Kolokotronis; Forest Keeper
Pope Leo does not espouse the mechanical view, even though he uses the verb "dictated"...What we have here is healthy, critical, balanced view on the nature of divine inspiration

Whatever Alex. You see it as healthy and balanced and I see it as a presumptious figments of his imagination. Lots of words, and not a shred of evidence of any substance.

38 posted on 02/17/2009 1:39:26 AM PST by kosta50 (Don't look up, the truth is all around you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson