Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Survey: Less Than 1 Percent of Young Adults Hold Biblical Worldview
The Christian Post ^ | March 10, 2009 | Jennifer Riley

Posted on 03/10/2009 1:55:01 PM PDT by Squidpup

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: Squidpup

This is pretty weak survey technique for all the reasons outlined above by sharp Freepers. I would also suggest that test-savvy people know to mark as “false” all questions with “always”, “never” and “absolute.”


21 posted on 03/10/2009 2:20:41 PM PDT by neocon1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0

Unless you live in the middle of nowhere, there’s got to be a bible believing church somewhere close by.

Forsake not the assemblying of yourselves...


22 posted on 03/10/2009 2:20:58 PM PDT by kailbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jla

I wonder what Barna thinks of the recent Catholic conference on evolution?

Probably knocks the Catholic Church out of his narrow box.


23 posted on 03/10/2009 2:21:52 PM PDT by texmexis best (uency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Martin Tell
Which of the principles listed is not necessary for a biblical worldview? Which could you add that would be universally recognized by orthodox Christian scholars?

A principle like "a person cannot earn their way into Heaven by trying to be good or do good works" is not merely one interpretation of certainly Bible passages; it's a fundamental tenet of Christianity.

24 posted on 03/10/2009 2:24:50 PM PDT by Arguendo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Arguendo
Otherwise, what would be the point of using the Old Testament today?

I find the principles of Jesus and the principles of Joshua quite 'different', to put it mildly.

25 posted on 03/10/2009 2:25:55 PM PDT by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: texmexis best

I didn’t see anything there that would conflict with an acceptance of evolution. I believe in evolution, and can answer yes to each of those questions.

This doesn’t require fundamentalism—just orthodox Christian beliefs—which is why it’s disturbing that so few people can accept it.


26 posted on 03/10/2009 2:28:14 PM PDT by Arguendo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner

I notice that you’re not a Christian. On the surface OT and NT principles appear quite different, but I don’t think many Christians who have studied the issue (perhaps excluding some dispensationalists—I’m not really sure what they believe) would accept that distinction.


27 posted on 03/10/2009 2:32:08 PM PDT by Arguendo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Squidpup

The fields are ripe for harvest.


28 posted on 03/10/2009 2:36:22 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arguendo

The heresy that the God of the Old Testament is not the God of the New Testament is called Marcionism, and is the primary reason the Church went to the trouble of establishing the canon of both Testaments.

Outsiders are of course free to disagree, but orthodox Christianity holds that the core principles of the two Testaments are identical, differentiated only by the difference in circumstance of time.


29 posted on 03/10/2009 2:43:34 PM PDT by Philo-Junius (One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: neocon1984

so you would mark False for the question of whether “absolute moral truth exists” ?


30 posted on 03/10/2009 2:53:26 PM PDT by Squidpup ("Fight the Good Fight")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Squidpup

I can believe this, just look around you. Even conservatives rarely crack open a Bible. They’re too busy politiking on their computers. Oh well... ;)


31 posted on 03/10/2009 2:53:41 PM PDT by deannadurbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arguendo
Yes and no. All of the questions presuppose that reformed Christianity (Calvinist) is the only proper interpretation of the Bible. While I can agree with the statement on its surface, it carries with it concepts of faith alone and total depravity. Many orthodox Christians do not agree with these concepts.

While certainly I agree that one cannot earn one's way into heaven, faith alone is not enough. At the Last Judgment, what will Jesus ask us and judge us on? Not on whether we believed, but whether we acted (fed the hungry, gave drink to the thirsty, visited the sick and those in prison).

That said, faith is totally necessary. One cannot even know Jesus to start the good works without faith.

It's not a matter of faith versus works; it's both working together. I'm sure you are familiar with the Book of James.

32 posted on 03/10/2009 3:03:47 PM PDT by Martin Tell (ask for the ancient paths, ask where the good way is, and walk in it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Squidpup

I’ve seen a lot of phony polls, and this strikes me as one.

But I’ll give it this much credence. Quite often, even if you’ve been a Christian your entire life, even if you grow up well steeped in scripture, people will find that during their first few years of adulthood they have to relearn and rediscover it. Its a part of being a young adult. For a period people will often find themselves questioning what they’ve been taught and what they believe and how do you live what you believe.

Then at a certain point, it gels, and this time its not the child’s faith, its the faith of an adult.

This poll is aimed at the age group that is going through that rediscovery. Its a natural part of the maturing process as you transition from believing something because its what you were taught, to believing something because you’ve come to know it for yourself.


33 posted on 03/10/2009 3:13:03 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Martin Tell

Agreed, but that doesn’t conflict with any of the principles listed. Works are important, but you obviously can’t earn your way into heaven through works.

I’m a Calvinist, but I think Catholics could also agree with all of these points. I think you’d start to find disagreement in some “emergent” churches (and is part of the reason I have a problem with these churches), and more serious disagreement in the old mainline denominations.


34 posted on 03/10/2009 3:17:08 PM PDT by Arguendo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Arguendo
So glad we can agree.

My first post was due to what I perceived as an agenda on the part of the poll takers.

Perhaps C.S. Lewis (Mere Christianity) would be best positioned to devise an objective poll as to how many actually hold Christian beliefs.

35 posted on 03/10/2009 3:22:25 PM PDT by Martin Tell (ask for the ancient paths, ask where the good way is, and walk in it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: texmexis best

I wonder how the actual questions were worded in the actual poll. I suspect what we see here is a rephrase.


36 posted on 03/10/2009 4:20:08 PM PDT by lucias_clay (Its times like this I'm glad I'm a whig.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Squidpup

From the article:

Among “born again Christians,” the study found that they are twice as likely as the average adult to have a biblical worldview. However, that still amounted to no more than about one out of five (19 percent) born again Christians, a small minority, the study pointed out.

____________________________________________

Um... 19% is much more than twice <.5% . New math at work.


37 posted on 03/10/2009 6:30:32 PM PDT by reaganaut (ex-mormon, now Christian. "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squidpup

This is what happens when Biblical literacy is practically non-existent.


38 posted on 03/10/2009 6:31:54 PM PDT by reaganaut (ex-mormon, now Christian. "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0
I'm just curious, what denomination did you belong to? No doubt there are a lot of “false” preachers. Christ himself warned us of them. That is why it is so important to know what the Bible says so we can guard against being deceived. There are bible-beliving churches out there. But as someone once said to me when I said the church was full of hypocrites.."well, there is always room for one more”. Try not to be discouraged. Read the Bible for yourself. We don't need to be in a church for it to change our lives. God bless.
39 posted on 03/10/2009 7:41:08 PM PDT by bella1 (Remember; it took four years of Carter to give us eight years of Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bella1

i don’t really have a denomination anymore. I spent years in an assembly of God church, went to a lutheran college, tried united brethren, methodist, first community, catholic, COGIC, and a couple others. denomination doesn’t really matter to me, as long as the teachings are sound.
i still believe, read my bible, and i know i will eventually find a church.


40 posted on 03/11/2009 8:17:40 AM PDT by absolootezer0 (thank God for Chicago: makes Detroit look wholesome by comparison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson