Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Mormons Think of the Bible
Michael Davis' Virtual Desk ^ | Michael Davis

Posted on 06/23/2009 3:47:53 PM PDT by delacoert

Official Mormon Statements about the Bible:

The Mormon church teaches that the Bible has been corrupted and does not contain the fullness of the gospel. This is reflected in one of their Articles of Faith which states: "We believe the Bible to be the word of God as far as it is translated correctly" (Pearl of Great Price).

Comparisons made by Mormon Leaders between the Bible and Book of Mormon. In contrast to the Bible, Mormons believe the Book of Mormon is perfect because it was translated perfectly (miraculously) as reflected in the second half of the same Article of Faith: "...we also believe the Book of Mormon to be the word of God [but without any qualifications as to translation accuracy]" (Pearl of Great Price).



TOPICS: Ecumenism; Other non-Christian
KEYWORDS: antimormonthread; lsd; mormon; mormonism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last
This article is posted in response to comments made in another thread to the effect that "Mormans never denegrate the Bible.
1 posted on 06/23/2009 3:47:54 PM PDT by delacoert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TheDon; aimhigh; Alamo-Girl; Alex Murphy; aMorePerfectUnion; Broker; brytlea; Colofornian; ...

ping


2 posted on 06/23/2009 3:49:32 PM PDT by delacoert (imperat animus corpori, et paretur statim; imperat animus sibi, et resistitur -- Augustini)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delacoert

The real question is, what do Mormons think of the Rosetta stone? You’re familiar with the story I assume?


3 posted on 06/23/2009 3:52:07 PM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946

No, I’m not. I’m interested to find out though.


4 posted on 06/23/2009 3:53:12 PM PDT by delacoert (imperat animus corpori, et paretur statim; imperat animus sibi, et resistitur -- Augustini)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: delacoert

Not much.


5 posted on 06/23/2009 3:53:49 PM PDT by svcw (Barry: mentally deficient & narcissistic megonogistic megalomaniac psychopath w/ paranoid delusions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delacoert

As a dues-paying member of “The Great and Abominable Church” (Catholic if you haven’t guessed), I resemble that last remark.

OBTW, my Protestant brothers and sisters needn’t feel left out; the Mormon GA’s refer to all of you as the “lewd daughters” of TGAAC.

“A man has to believe in something. I believe I’ll have another drink.”

;^)


6 posted on 06/23/2009 3:55:39 PM PDT by elcid1970 (O Muslim! My bullets are dipped in pig grease!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delacoert
It's great, as long as it's translated correctly individual scriptures can be manipulated to fit our needs...
7 posted on 06/23/2009 3:57:07 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (Mitt Romney is a more subtle version of Arlen Specter with better hair...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delacoert

My last name is Moore, I’m a man (the last time I checked), and I have no problems with the Bible!


8 posted on 06/23/2009 3:58:00 PM PDT by johnthebaptistmoore (Conservatives obey the rules. Leftists cheat. Who probably has the political advantage?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

Trust us, we feel the love ;-)


9 posted on 06/23/2009 3:58:55 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (Mitt Romney is a more subtle version of Arlen Specter with better hair...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: delacoert
Just a comment.....

Joseph Smith claimed: "I told the brethren that the Book of Mormon was more correct than any book on earth,

Prove it.

10 posted on 06/23/2009 3:59:03 PM PDT by MrPiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delacoert

And I stand by that statement! :-)


11 posted on 06/23/2009 4:01:36 PM PDT by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delacoert
Then why did JSjr incorporate known mistakes from the Bible into the BOM? Were the mistakes translated correctly from Reformed Egyptian into KJ English?

ping

12 posted on 06/23/2009 4:02:08 PM PDT by SkyDancer ('Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not..' ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delacoert

The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration (4th Edition)

"This thoroughly revised edition of Bruce M. Metzger's classic work is the most up-to-date manual available for the textual criticism of the New Testament. The Text of the New Testament, Fourth Edition, has been invigorated by the addition of Bart D. Ehrman--author of numerous best-selling books on the New Testament--as a coauthor. This revision brings the discussion of such important matters as the early Greek manuscripts and methods of textual criticism up to date, integrating recent research findings and approaches into the body of the text (as opposed to previous revisions, which compiled new material and notes into appendices). The authors also examine new areas of interest, including the use of computers in the collection and evaluation of manuscript evidence and the effects that social and ideological influences had upon the work of scribes. The standard text for courses in biblical studies and the history of Christianity since its first publication in 1964, The Text of the New Testament is poised to become a definitive resource for a whole new generation of students."

Although delacoert refuses to admit it, I think she is a believer in the traditions of the "infallability" and "inerrancy" of the Bible, and anyone who doesn't agree is disparaging the Bible. Several hundred years of modern textual criticism of the Greek New Testament have demonstrated thousands of variants in the various manuscripts. Apparently, mentioning those facts is disparaging the Bible in delacoert's eyes.

13 posted on 06/23/2009 4:09:29 PM PDT by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delacoert

I had a couple of Mormon missionaries stop by my house several years ago. They were pleasant and I enjoyed talking to them.

The one thing we disagreed on was the accuracy of the Bible. We all agreed that it was true as far as it was accurately translated. Where we disagreed was that I think most standard versions are very good translations while they do not.

I will say my Grandfather was a Southern Baptist preacher and a graduate of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louiville, KY. He graduated in the early 1900’s.

Granddady could read and translate both Greek and Latin. He once told me the King James version was a very good translation with no real inaccuracies. A few places where it could have been done better but not affecting the basic story.

Some of the newer ones such as Good News Bible are even better.


14 posted on 06/23/2009 4:09:43 PM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delacoert
Ignorant translators

Didn't know their "reformed Egyptian".

15 posted on 06/23/2009 4:11:57 PM PDT by Graybeard58 ( Selah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delacoert
Thanks for posting this.

It explains a lot.

16 posted on 06/23/2009 4:12:48 PM PDT by GiovannaNicoletta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yarddog
We all agreed that it was true as far as it was accurately translated.

Doh! There you go, disparaging the Bible! You heathen! :-)

17 posted on 06/23/2009 4:13:35 PM PDT by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: delacoert

John Smith just rewrote the Bible with a smattering of Masonic Bible/Masonic teachings. Anyone who is or has ever been a Mason will recognize the Masonic ideals and even vergabe in reading their Bible.


18 posted on 06/23/2009 4:14:35 PM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delacoert

I bet GOP_Lady will still come in here and start campaigning for Romney. With all we now know about him she still would vote for that guy.


19 posted on 06/23/2009 4:34:32 PM PDT by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970
As a dues-paying member of “The Great and Abominable Church” (Catholic if you haven’t guessed), I resemble that last remark.

OBTW, my Protestant brothers and sisters needn’t feel left out; the Mormon GA’s refer to all of you as the “lewd daughters” of TGAAC.

Left out??? Your "Great and Abominable Church" didn't even rate a mention in Joseph's "first vision"....

And as I leaned up to the fireplace, mother inquired what the matter was. I replied, “Never mind, all is well—I am well enough off.” I then said to my mother, “I have learned for myself that Presbyterianism is not true.” It seems as though the adversary was aware, at a very early period of my life, that I was destined to prove a disturber and an annoyer of his kingdom; else why should the powers of darkness combine against me?

20 posted on 06/23/2009 4:44:28 PM PDT by Alex Murphy (Theology is the Queen Of The Sciences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson