Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Old Is Your Church?
EWTN ^ | not given | EWTN

Posted on 06/27/2009 10:01:54 AM PDT by Salvation

How Old Is Your Church?

If you are a Lutheran, your religion was founded by Martin Luther, an ex- monk of the Catholic Church, in the year 1517.

If you belong to the Church of England, your religion was founded by King Henry VIII in the year 1534 because the Pope would not grant him a divorce with the right to remarry.

If you are a Presbyterian, your religion was founded by John Knox in Scotland in the year 1560.

If you are a Protestant Episcopalian, your religion was an offshoot of the Church of England founded by Samuel Seabury in the American colonies in the 17th century.

If you are a Congregationalist, your religion was originated by Robert Brown in Holland in 1582.

If you are a Methodist, your religion was launched by John and Charles Wesley in England in 1744.

If you are a Unitarian, Theophilus Lindley founded your church in London in 1774.

If you are a Mormon (Latter Day Saints), Joseph Smith started your religion in Palmyra, N.Y., in 1829.

If you are a Baptist, you owe the tenets of your religion to John Smyth, who launched it in Amsterdam in 1605.

If you are of the Dutch Reformed church, you recognize Michaelis Jones as founder, because he originated your religion in New York in 1628.

If you worship with the Salvation Army, your sect began with William Booth in London in 1865.

If you are a Christian Scientist, you look to 1879 as the year in which your religion was born and to Mrs. Mary Baker Eddy as its founder.

If you belong to one of the religious organizations known as 'Church of the Nazarene," "Pentecostal Gospel." "Holiness Church," "Pilgrim Holiness Church," "Jehovah's Witnesses," your religion is one of the hundreds of new sects founded by men within the past century.

If you are Catholic, you know that your religion was founded in the year 33 by Jesus Christ the Son of God, and it is still the same Church.



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; History; Theology
KEYWORDS: bs; catholic; catholiclist; dogma; flamebait
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 701-708 next last
To: Theo
No, Roman Catholicism wasn’t founded in 33 AD. Roman Catholicism was founded much later, in ... ROME.

She didn't say Roman Catholicism and didn't mean Roman Catholicsim.

She said Catholics, in the Catholic Church.

181 posted on 06/27/2009 2:12:04 PM PDT by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; All
“If you are Catholic, you know that your religion was founded in the year 33 by Jesus Christ the Son of God, and it is still the same Church.”
Seem rather petty (nay, even arrogant) to me, squabbling over who has the older or better religion and whatnot.

Especially considering the fact that what Christ wants is a personal relationship.


Congratulations to the Catholics though. (for whatever that is worth)
182 posted on 06/27/2009 2:12:06 PM PDT by Fichori
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
I asked a CofC preacher once if Eastern Orthodox Christians were saved since they practiced immersion baptism. he said NO, because one of his CofC preachers did not do the dipping.

A preacher has no more authority than anybody else. ALL authority is held by Christ. (Matthew 28:18) If the guy didn't give book, chapter and verse in support of his position, I would not worry about what he said. We all would be well-served to search the scriptures for ourselves and not accept any religious claims without scriptural proof.

183 posted on 06/27/2009 2:12:43 PM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
And repeating a claim (”The Catholic Church was founded by Christ, circa AD 33”) does not prove it.

Repeating a claim does not prove it.

But history does.

184 posted on 06/27/2009 2:13:07 PM PDT by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Fichori
Especially considering the fact that what Christ wants is a personal relationship.

Where in the Scriptures does Christ talk about having a "personal relationship" with anyone?
185 posted on 06/27/2009 2:13:24 PM PDT by bdeaner (The bread which we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ? (1 Cor. 10:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

“a remission before God of the temporal punishment due to sins whose guilt has already been forgiven”

Umm...if I forgive someone, I don’t impose temporal punishment. If it removes punishment, then it removes the consequences of sin.


186 posted on 06/27/2009 2:13:55 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I loathe the ground he slithers on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

All those monks’ properties to plunder.
____________________________________

What would Catholic monks, sworn to poverty, be doing owning “properties” ????


187 posted on 06/27/2009 2:14:39 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Then show the history. But to do that, you would have to show that Christ installed Peter as head of the Church - which all other denominations deny.

Based on scripture and history, I deny it as well. Acts 15:

“12 The whole assembly became silent as they listened to Barnabas and Paul telling about the miraculous signs and wonders God had done among the Gentiles through them. 13 When they finished, James spoke up...19 “It is my judgment, therefore, that we should not make it difficult for the Gentiles who are turning to God.”

Interesting. Peter was there, yet it was James who made the decision, based on testimony from Paul & Peter both.

It would seem history denies Peter was Numero Uno in the Church.


188 posted on 06/27/2009 2:19:13 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I loathe the ground he slithers on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: bdeaner
“Where in the Scriptures does Christ talk about having a "personal relationship" with anyone?”
If you need to use quotes, then why did you ask the question?

You have not left me with the impression that you really want an answer.
189 posted on 06/27/2009 2:23:26 PM PDT by Fichori
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: bdeaner

One of the problems with evangelical Christianity is that we have perverted the meaning of Revelations 3. We talk of inviting Christ into our lives, when what we need is to be born again - to die with Christ to sin, and live with Christ as a new creation.


190 posted on 06/27/2009 2:25:57 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I loathe the ground he slithers on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

HArdly ignorant — Baptists, Christian Scientists, both coming up with their own spin on things, so both the same. Neither are orthodox and both seem vaguel gnostic


191 posted on 06/27/2009 2:29:32 PM PDT by Cronos (Ceterum censeo, Mecca et Medina delendae sunt + Jindal 2K12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

We used to have lots of fun with CofC people here in the past. They haven’t been around in quite a while.


192 posted on 06/27/2009 2:29:36 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (A modern liberal is someone who doesn't care what you do so long as it is compulsory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

As a lutheran pastor, you need to be working to bring your flock into The Church instead of being outside.


193 posted on 06/27/2009 2:30:33 PM PDT by Cronos (Ceterum censeo, Mecca et Medina delendae sunt + Jindal 2K12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: pburgh01
This thread is retarded and sad that some Catholic apologists have to resort to specious and vapid sophomoric arguments

AMEN!

194 posted on 06/27/2009 2:31:02 PM PDT by lonestar (Obama is turning Bush's "mess" into a catastrophe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers; Charles Henrickson
And if you ask Charles, he'll say he's either ELCA or some other. In any case, the Lutherans and Anglicans are close to orthodoxy. They follow much of Apostolic Doctrine.

on the other hand, Baptists, Christian Scientists veer terribly close to heresy like the Jehovah's witnesses and mormon thoughts.
195 posted on 06/27/2009 2:33:14 PM PDT by Cronos (Ceterum censeo, Mecca et Medina delendae sunt + Jindal 2K12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

>>Hopefully you have seen my posts stating that a Christian’s ( Protestant and Catholic) **most** important mission is his **own** children. He second most important mission is the children of his congregation or parish.<<

Amen.
I was lead to Homeschool and I love it!


196 posted on 06/27/2009 2:33:44 PM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

As I said before, you are too ignorant to debate.


197 posted on 06/27/2009 2:34:21 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I loathe the ground he slithers on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Theo
No, Roman Catholicism wasn’t founded in 33 AD. Roman Catholicism was founded much later, in ... ROME.

Really? When was this formed according to you?
198 posted on 06/27/2009 2:35:24 PM PDT by Cronos (Ceterum censeo, Mecca et Medina delendae sunt + Jindal 2K12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

That is true, there is the catholic church, but that is not the same as the Roman Catholic Church. They are two different things


199 posted on 06/27/2009 2:35:28 PM PDT by Nosterrex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Fichori

I figured you couldn’t come up with an answer. Nice dodge, though. ;)


200 posted on 06/27/2009 2:36:16 PM PDT by bdeaner (The bread which we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ? (1 Cor. 10:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 701-708 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson