Not a straw man if I leave the term "literal" open to other possible meanings.
I explicitly wrote (above),
However, there may be other ways to understand the word "literal" that are different than the way I am using it, in this case specifically to mean an objective record of natural science or history void of figurative significance.
I'm not reducing "literal" to only this one meaning, but simply pointing out that this is how I was using the term with regard to Genesis in the context of this discussion. Seven days is not literally seven 24-hour days, not literally seven revolutions of the earth on its axis. It must be read on a different level.
posted on 07/26/2009 3:42:15 PM PDT
(The bread which we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ? (1 Cor. 10:16))
“Not a straw man if I leave the term “literal” open to other possible meanings.”
Which you didn’t do UNTIL AFTER you had put forward the straw man. Too late.
“I’m not reducing “literal” to only this one meaning,...”
You said that a literal view of Genesis would be the same as viewing it as science or history. How is that NOT reducing it to one meaning?
Again, I’m not attacking you, but I think you need to be more careful with how you word things.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson