Skip to comments.New astrophysical discoveries leave little to no room for Atheism, expert says
Posted on 09/30/2009 6:47:54 PM PDT by markomalley
Denver, Colo., Sep 30, 2009 / 03:35 pm (CNA).- Contemporary astrophysics hold the scientific key to prove the existence of God, but unfortunately very few know the scientific facts, said Fr. Robert J. Spitzer, S.J, PhD, during a conference delivered on Sunday at the John Paul II Center for the New Evangelization in Denver, Colorado.
The Honolulu-born Jesuit is the past president of Gonzaga University and is also well-known philosopher and physicist who is involved in bringing science and theology together.
Fr. Spitzer is currently engaged in an ambitious project to explain the metaphysical consequences of the latest astrophysical discoveries, mainly, the existence of a Creator.
The conference in Denver was sponsored by John and Carol Saeman as well as the California Catholic philanthropist Timothy Busch.
The arguments of Fr. Spitzer are addressed to every honest human being who is trying to reach to God through science, said Mr. Busch, during the introduction.
Atheism and pop culture have had a significant impact on Theism and it has to be confronted especially because Secularism and the negation of God are becoming pervasive, began the 57 year-old priest.
Theism, in fact, can be better explained by contemporary science and modern philosophy better than ever before, but particularly interesting is what is happening in the field of astrophysics ... to the point that I can't imagine why agnosticism and Atheism are still popular, Fr. Spitzer said.
That is why we need contemporary translators that are capable of bringing today's science to regular people, and especially, to bring the astrophysical response to atheism, he added.
Fr. Spitzer explained that, since science is based on a empirical model, it can change at any time. Nevertheless, as science develops and the so called Big Bang theory of the origin and existence of the universe becomes more refined, it becomes less and less possible for other explanations (of the universe) to be scientifically viable.
The theory, developed by the Belgian Catholic priest and astronomer Georges Lemaître, proposes that the Universe has expanded from a primordial dense initial condition at some time in the past (currently estimated to have been approximately 13.7 billion years ago), and continues to expand to this day.
The model, according to Fr. Spitzer, has been revised, refined and scientifically established to a point that any other theory of the origin and existence of the universe has become harder and harder to defend.
Fr. Spitzer explained that, what we know from the most recent scientific evidence is that the universe is not the universe of Mr. Newton anymore, it is not infinite, it is finite, it started at some point, and is in constant expansion.
He then explained the complexity of the universe, saying it is based on an incredibly delicate balance of 17 cosmological constants. If any of them would be off by one part of a tenth at a forty potency, we would be dead and the universe would not be what it is.
Every single Big Bang model shows the existence of what scientists call a singularity, and the existence of each singularity demands the existence of an external element to the universe, Fr. Spitzer said.
The priest physicist then proceeded to explain the different, complex versions of the various Bing Bang theories.
He quoted Roger Penrose, the world-famous English mathematician and physicist, who corrected some of the theories of his friend and colleague Stephen Hawkins to conclude that every Big Bang theory, including the one known as Quantum theory, confirms the existence of singularities. Therefore, said Spitzer, the need to find an explanation to the universes existence drives us to seek a force that is previous and independent from the universe.
Fr. Spitzer also quoted the 2003 experiments by three leading cosmologists, Arvin Borde, Alan Guth, and Alexander Vilenkin, who were able to prove that any universe which has, on average, been expanding throughout its history cannot be infinite in the past but must have a past space-time boundary.
The concept at this point is clear: nothing is nothing, and from nothing, nothing comes, since nothing is... nothing! Fr. Spitzer said, to explain the fact that contemporary astrophysics demands something with sufficient power to bring the universe into existence.
It sounds like a theological argument, but is really a scientific conclusion.
There is no way to ignore the fact that it demands the existence of a singularity and therefore of a Creator outside space and time, he added.
According to Fr. Spitzer, this theory has become so scientifically solid, that 50% of astrophysicists are coming out of the closet an accepting a metaphysical conclusion: the need of a Creator.
The Jesuit priest explained that this theory is not what is currently known as Intelligent Design.
Intelligent Design is a biological theory, this is an anthropic universe theory, based on the question: Can our universe sustain forms of life no matter what, without any external energy?
According to Fr. Spitzer, Professor Penrose has provided a mathematical model in which the possibilities of a universe that would not be gobbled without the existence of a Creator are simply improvable, to a point of mathematical impossibility.
What can we conclude of this? First that the Creator is really smart... and second that it must be a loving one, because He could choose so many more violent and chaotic alternatives, that it really has to make you wonder.
Fr. Spitzer explained to CNA that all this information must be conveyed in a simple manner to our seminarians, our college and high school students, who are mostly ignorant of the powerful Theistic message of todays astrophysics.
The Jesuit physicist, with the help of some Catholic philanthropists, is working on a project to create a 90-minute curriculum, divided into three 30-minute segments, that will offer the astrophysics-based response to atheism. It will be a high quality production that will involve 12 physicists, as well as dynamic and engaging graphics, he explained.
The idea, he told CNA, is to make not only DVDs that can be distributed to all Catholic high schools or Newman centers around the U.S., but to make it available for free via the Internet.
Fr. Spitzer is working in another three more 90-minute curricula: The historical evidence of Jesus, Suffering and the love of God and Contemporary philosophical responses to Atheism.
Ping to read tomorrow.
That would explain those mornings when I wake up in a whole different world.
Although, I tend to believe in a Prime Mover, of some sort.
I think one could sufficiently write up a convincing dissertation (or thesis) proving that God withholds certain elements of “common sense” from those in the upper echelon of science (such as the above)..and grants it to the poor.
That's all you need to know.
The apostle Paul did something along those lines in Romans 1.
“Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools...”
If I am wrong about G-d, the Father almighty, maker of heaven and earth, and His Son, Jesus the Christ, what do I lose?
But, if I'm right...
Is a little knowledge a dangerous thing?
Nothing like Pascal’s Wager, huh?
I’m guessing that Fr. Robert Spitzer is not a close relative of Eliot Spitzer.
“If I am wrong about G-d, the Father almighty, maker of heaven and earth, and His Son, Jesus the Christ, what do I lose?”
Isn’t this called Pascal’s Wager?
Don’t know if this is appropriate to ping your lists or not, but consider yourselves pinged...
“This is all well and good, but if you REALLY want to see evidence for the existence of God, check out the Mandelbrot Set.”
Please explain; I am not questioning you on this to be critical, I honestly want to know your explanation for how this provides evidence of God. I looked into the Mandelbrot Set, and it seems fascinating, but somehow I missed out on whatever evidence you saw for God.
A singularity does not necessarily imply that there is a God.
What the singularity does imply is a nexus to another dimension of space time.
Whether “God” is there or not, can only be proven by accessing that gateway ( which some say we do upon death.)
This is an interesting aspect of science, but a singulariity to another dimension could just as easily connect to hell as well as heaven, so we have to be very careful about what we assume.
We know little about singularities. In fact some scientists believe that micro-singularities might temporarily exist throughout our own universe and even on the Earth itself.