Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cao’s Catholic conscience
GetReligion ^ | November 9, 2009 | Mollie

Posted on 11/11/2009 6:51:28 PM PST by Alex Murphy

When the House narrowly passed its health care reform bill on Saturday night, it received 219 votes from Democrats and one from a Republican. I mentioned already that I was at the hospital with my daughter when it passed so I was passing time following reporters and pundits on Twitter. Many of them expressed shock — or at least surprise — that any Republican would support the bill. And when it was revealed that the lone vote came from Louisiana Rep. Joseph Cao, people referred to him mostly in that “oh yeah, he’s the guy who beat the corrupt William Jefferson” sort of way. Note this lede from a Christian Science Monitor story:

Rep. Anh “Joseph” Cao (R) of Louisiana must not have gotten the message from House Republicans that no one in the GOP caucus — repeat no one — would vote with Democrats on a sweeping overhaul of the US healthcare system.

In a vote late Saturday night, Representative Cao — a vulnerable freshman in a Democratic district still devastated by hurricane Katrina — broke ranks, casting the lone Republican vote for the legislation.

“I have always said that I would put aside partisan wrangling to do the business of the people. My vote tonight was based on my priority of doing what is best for my constituents,” he said in a statement after the vote.

In Cao’s district, 3 out of 4 voters chose Barack Obama in the 2008 presidential elections. In 2004, President Bush won only 24 percent of the vote here.

Now, other stories point out that Republicans knew that Cao’s vote would likely be in favor. But anyone who pays attention to the religion angle of Cao’s story would know the same. Heck, he said he favored the legislation three months ago … with one major caveat. We looked at media coverage of his statement last August.

He had told the New Orleans Times-Picayune that he could not support any bill that permits public money to be spent on abortion. He said that any bill without strong language prohibiting the use of federal funding for abortion would be “a no-go” for him. He explained:

“Being a Jesuit, I very much adhere to the notion of social justice,” Cao said. “I do fully understand the need of providing everyone with access to health care, but to me personally, I cannot be privy to a law that will allow the potential of destroying thousands of innocent lives.

“I know that voting against the health care bill will probably be the death of my political career,” Cao said, “but I have to live with myself, and I always reflect on the phrase of the New Testament, ‘How does it profit a man’s life to gain the world but to lose his soul.’ “

So not much of a surprise, then, that he voted in favor of the bill, considering the passage of the Stupak amendment barring taxpayer funding of abortions.

Many of the stories that mention Cao’s vote take notice of his Catholicism, however obliquely. But I do have to point out this bit from a post titled “Who is Cao” from Jay Newton-Small at Time:

Cao originally became a Roman Catholic Priest, serving six years in a Jesuit seminary after getting his bachelors degree in physics at Baylor University in Waco, Texas. After leaving the priesthood he received a master’s in philosophy from Fordham University in New York and a law degree from Loyola in New Orleans in 2000, where he also taught undergraduate philosophy.

Uh, not exactly.

You can read this wonderful Dec. 2008 interview of Cao by one Dan Gilgoff over at U.S. News & World Report for more information, but in it he explains that he only made it halfway through Jesuit formation and was never ordained. That interview, which includes a fascinating explanation of why he left the seminary, also quotes Cao saying that health care reform is a priority for him.


TOPICS: Catholic; Ministry/Outreach; Moral Issues; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: 111th; cao; catholicpoliticians
“Being a Jesuit, I very much adhere to the notion of social justice,” Cao said. “I do fully understand the need of providing everyone with access to health care, but to me personally, I cannot be privy to a law that will allow the potential of destroying thousands of innocent lives. I know that voting against the health care bill will probably be the death of my political career,” Cao said, “but I have to live with myself, and I always reflect on the phrase of the New Testament, ‘How does it profit a man’s life to gain the world but to lose his soul.’ “

So not much of a surprise, then, that he voted in favor of the bill, considering the passage of the Stupak amendment barring taxpayer funding of abortions. Many of the stories that mention Cao’s vote take notice of his Catholicism, however obliquely.

1 posted on 11/11/2009 6:51:29 PM PST by Alex Murphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
Obviously he was sleeping in class during the “Render unto God what is God's and render unto Caesar what is Caesar's”. Call these “social justice” arguments are arguments in favor of socialism. Why isn't he working with Catholic charities to increase free coverage for the poor through Catholic hospitals rather than stealing from the taxpayer? Cao probably was absent during the “Thou Shalt Not Steal” chapter.
2 posted on 11/11/2009 6:56:16 PM PST by JMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Must be one of those Notre Dame Catholics. He is a clown because the lib Dems are going to rip out the abortion ban.


3 posted on 11/11/2009 6:58:25 PM PST by Frantzie (Judge David Carter - democrat & dishonorable Marine like John Murtha.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Cao’s a con-man, clown or collectivist. Get out of my life, statist.


4 posted on 11/11/2009 7:10:09 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
Jesuits are not even Christians in this darkening age, so whether he completed some bogus "Jesuit" education is inconsequential. Cao must be from the Diem version of Asian Catholicism. Perhaps he could return to his homeland and become a model party apparatchik.
5 posted on 11/11/2009 7:13:11 PM PST by hinckley buzzard (Truth -- to a liberal, what sunrise is to a vampire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Just as it is gravely wrong to take from individuals what they can accomplish by their own initiative and industry and give it to the community, so also it is an injustice and at the same time a grave evil and disturbance of right order to assign to a greater and higher association what lesser and subordinate organizations can do. For every social activity ought of its very nature to furnish help to the members of the body social, and never destroy and absorb them.

Pius XI, Quadragesimo Anno, 79

By intervening directly and depriving society of its responsibility, the Social Assistance State leads to a loss of human energies and an inordinate increase of public agencies, which are dominated more by bureaucratic ways of thinking than by concern for serving their clients, and which are accompanied by an enormous increase in spending. In fact, it would appear that needs are best understood and satisfied by people who are closest to them and who act as neighbours to those in need. It should be added that certain kinds of demands often call for a response which is not simply material but which is capable of perceiving the deeper human need. One thinks of the condition of refugees, immigrants, the elderly, the sick, and all those in circumstances which call for assistance, such as drug abusers: all these people can be helped effectively only by those who offer them genuine fraternal support, in addition to the necessary care.

John Paul II, Centesimus annus, 48

Apparently former Seminarian Cao didn't learn his social doctrine very well.

But that is more-or-less typical for individuals who self identify as very much adhere(adhering) to the notion of social justice

At least IMHO.

6 posted on 11/11/2009 7:17:28 PM PST by markomalley (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley; Alex Murphy
Apparently former Seminarian Cao didn't learn his social doctrine very well.

This seems to be a pretty common problem. I know you've mentioned that the priests that are coming out of seminaries now are more conservative, but how much of this "social justice" crap is going to get eliminated?

Any church that takes huge sums from the govt for it's charity work becomes dependent. Will a new cadre of conservative priests change this?

7 posted on 11/11/2009 7:37:14 PM PST by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

It seems like Cao brought some communism from Vietnam with him.


8 posted on 11/11/2009 9:12:46 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley; Alex Murphy

“For, while the socialists would destroy the “right” of property, alleging it to be a human invention altogether opposed to the inborn equality of man, and, claiming a community of goods, argue that poverty should not be peaceably endured, and that the property and privileges of the rich may be rightly invaded, the Church, with much greater wisdom and good sense, recognizes the inequality among men, who are born with different powers of body and mind, inequality in actual possession, also, and holds that the right of property and of ownership, which springs from nature itself, must not be touched and stands inviolate.
....

Moreover, labor hard that the children of the Catholic Church neither join nor favor in any way whatsoever this abominable sect; let them show, on the contrary, by noble deeds and right dealing in all things, how well and happily human society would hold together were each member to shine as an example of right doing and of virtue.”

Leo XIII, Quod Apostolici Muneris “On Socialism”

http://www.ewtn.com/library/ENCYC/L13APOST.HTM


9 posted on 11/12/2009 7:10:57 AM PST by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

You know another thing that burns me up about Catholics supporting this garbage?

It is *flagrantly unconstitutional*. I’m NO fan of this kind of intrusion in the private sector, but at least if the individual states did it they would probably be doing so legally—at least where their state constitutions allow.

These...I almost typed something mean....these ignorant Catholics think that some misguided notion of “social justice” gives them the right to *take people’s money,* *force them to buy health insurance* and flagrantly violate the 10th Amendment?

Are you KIDDING me? Do they know nothing of the theological principle of *subsidiarity*?

Foolish Catholics with horrendous formation in the faith. Go back to school Cao...and all my other fellow Catholics who are parroting these same ridiculous arguments. The Church *does not allow you* to violate the U.S. Constitution to give people healthcare.


10 posted on 11/12/2009 7:28:33 AM PST by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

So are Jesuits liberals or not?

just asking...


11 posted on 11/12/2009 7:31:36 AM PST by wardaddy (The movie Valkyrie was excellent...I was surprised. What a cast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
Uh, not exactly. You can read this wonderful Dec. 2008 interview of Cao by one Dan Gilgoff over at U.S. News & World Report for more information, but in it he explains that he only made it halfway through Jesuit formation and was never ordained. That interview, which includes a fascinating explanation of why he left the seminary, also quotes Cao saying that health care reform is a priority for him.

Yet he claims to be a Jesuit. He's lying. What else is he lying about? For what other lies are FReepers who don't read complete articles falling?

12 posted on 11/12/2009 7:34:41 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wmfights
Will a new cadre of conservative priests change this?

Yes. You might have to be Catholic to fully appreciate it, though, as change usually comes slowly. Still, I've seen looney-left Parishes take a hard turn in the opposite direction just with the arrival of a newly ordained Associate Pastor.

13 posted on 11/12/2009 7:37:54 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy; All

In Cao’s district, 3 out of 4 voters chose Barack Obama in the 2008 presidential elections. In 2004, President Bush won only 24 percent of the vote here

Hello, give the man a break


14 posted on 11/12/2009 7:38:35 AM PST by Augustinian monk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

You would think that would have been included in the excerpts in the first post, it seems to clarify the congesscritter’s statement.

Freegards


15 posted on 11/12/2009 8:16:51 AM PST by Ransomed (Son of Ransomed Says Keep the Faith!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Augustinian monk

Cao is on his way to the political “execution chamber”. That trip started the day he was elected in an overwhelmingly D district. He only won because he ran against a D crook. This health care vote was a desperate attempt to gain favor with the electorate. He is figuratively, a “dead man walking”. Fortunately, Rep. Owen(D), from the NY 23rd CD, is also a “dead man walking” provided the Rs can get their act together.


16 posted on 11/12/2009 9:57:01 AM PST by Upbeat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy; Mr Rogers; the_conscience; 1000 silverlings; Gamecock; HarleyD; wmfights; xzins; ...
"Being a Jesuit, I very much adhere to the notion of social justice," Cao said.

"...and thus I work surreptitiously to push the fascist agenda of those who desire a "global authority" over the entire planet."

Cao speculates in this article his political career might be over.

We can only hope. The 54% of Roman Catholics who voted for Obama obviously would feel right at home with this doofus who tells us he actually believes the democrats when they promise not to fund abortions with tax dollars.

It's coming, thanks to fools like Cao. Prepare for it.

17 posted on 11/13/2009 10:35:34 AM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Augustinian monk; Alex Murphy
In Cao?s district, 3 out of 4 voters chose Barack Obama in the 2008 presidential elections. In 2004, President Bush won only 24 percent of the vote here Hello, give the man a break

Then Cao should either be a democrat or find himself an honest profession.

18 posted on 11/13/2009 10:38:33 AM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; Alex Murphy; Mr Rogers; the_conscience; 1000 silverlings; Gamecock; HarleyD; ...
The 54% of Roman Catholics who voted for Obama...

The problem is RC's do not want to engage on this topic. It is a liberal church that has a minority of conservatives of varying degree. Once the life issues are "finessed" the vast majority of RC's will vote Rat.

I'm not sure it can be changed. I think this liberal bent is a result of organizational structure and it's prior history as a part of the state.

19 posted on 11/13/2009 11:19:28 AM PST by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: wmfights; Dr. Eckleburg; Alex Murphy; Mr Rogers; the_conscience; 1000 silverlings; HarleyD

Catholicism; The Mother Church of the Democratic Party

or is it

The Democrats; Official Party of The Roman Catholics


20 posted on 11/13/2009 11:34:38 AM PST by Gamecock (A tulip, the most beautiful flower in God's garden.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

The so-called 54% of Catholics who voted for Obama is based on yet another MSM lie: a non-scientific poll run by the liberal Pew Foundation.


21 posted on 11/13/2009 11:36:38 AM PST by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock; Dr. Eckleburg; Alex Murphy; Mr Rogers; the_conscience; 1000 silverlings; HarleyD
The Democrats; Official Party of The Roman Catholics

I would have to pick this one. :0

Other than the life issues what does the RCC have incommon with the Pubs?

The Pubs are more closely associated with conservatives and libertarianism. Solutions to social problems are usually looked for in individual empowerment not new govt controls. For example: health care, Pubs propose changes in tax deductibility for individuals, the right to buy policies out of state, and changes in how group's are formed for underwriting. The Rats propose more govt and paying for it by taking from one group to give to another group.

From what I can tell the only objection to the Rat plan from RC Bishops is funding for abortion.

22 posted on 11/13/2009 11:46:46 AM PST by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
Where was that photo taken? We don't use little cups.

This is an accompanying photo, but still doesn't identify where this is taking place:


23 posted on 11/13/2009 11:58:06 AM PST by Lorica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Lorica

Are you saying Kerry hasn’t been excommunicated for his proabortion stance?


24 posted on 11/13/2009 12:07:54 PM PST by Gamecock (A tulip, the most beautiful flower in God's garden.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Did it sound like I said that?


25 posted on 11/13/2009 12:08:54 PM PST by Lorica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Lorica; Gamecock

Somebody should have said it.


26 posted on 11/13/2009 12:11:24 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: wmfights
Other than the life issues what does the RCC have in common with the Pubs?

Well, the home office is pro-life.

If Catholic-Dems in Congress would vote pro-life we see far fewer abortions in this country.

27 posted on 11/13/2009 12:14:07 PM PST by Gamecock (A tulip, the most beautiful flower in God's garden.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lorica
It looks like it was here, in 2004:

Yesterday, Mr. Kerry again worshipped at a Protestant congregation: Charles Street African Methodist Episcopal Church in Dorchester, Mass.

28 posted on 11/13/2009 12:20:42 PM PST by Lorica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
Well, the home office is pro-life.

LOL, well said.

29 posted on 11/13/2009 12:22:31 PM PST by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Lorica

So here is a Roman Catholic who:

-Is pro-infanticide and is still a “card carrying Roman Catholic.”

and

-Takes communion in a church that denies that the elements are truly Christ’s body and blood.


30 posted on 11/13/2009 12:27:23 PM PST by Gamecock (A tulip, the most beautiful flower in God's garden.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Lorica
Better?


31 posted on 11/13/2009 12:29:25 PM PST by Gamecock (A tulip, the most beautiful flower in God's garden.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

I already know he’s a lousy Catholic. And so do you.

What can you tell me that I don’t already know?


32 posted on 11/13/2009 12:30:15 PM PST by Lorica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Lorica; wmfights; Dr. Eckleburg

Now boys, you know you
should be pro-life.
The Pope
33 posted on 11/13/2009 12:32:15 PM PST by Gamecock (A tulip, the most beautiful flower in God's garden.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Better? No. Totally irrelevant.

I asked specifically where the other photo was taken, since we don’t use little cups. Obviously, I found out on my own.


34 posted on 11/13/2009 12:32:48 PM PST by Lorica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

Anybody familiar with that district knows that the alternative could be much worse than a GOPer who votes for govt healthcare. Think “Cold cash” Jefferson, Sheila Jackson Lee or Maxine Waters worse-LOL. At least on social issues he can be conservative without angering his district too much.


35 posted on 11/13/2009 12:39:33 PM PST by Augustinian monk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
Now boys, you know you should be pro-life. The Pope

LOL, that's about how it comes off.

In fairness to our RC FRiends a great many of them take it very seriously and are disgusted that their church doesn't do more about it. But the life issue, by itself does not a conservative make!

36 posted on 11/13/2009 1:34:46 PM PST by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Augustinian monk
Anybody familiar with that district knows that the alternative could be much worse than a GOPer who votes for govt healthcare.

I understand the point. He didn't vote for the Rat speaker of the House. The "blue dogs" who claim to be fiscal conservatives did that.

If he doesn't have a chance to be reelected it would have been nice to see him go down fighting for FREEDOM.

37 posted on 11/13/2009 1:39:54 PM PST by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
Then Cao should either be a democrat or find himself an honest profession.

Yes, and add his visit to Keith Olberman to his list of honesty issues. Why this dance of pretense?
38 posted on 11/13/2009 1:44:36 PM PST by roses of sharon (A warrior assumes that he is already dead, so he might as well fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: wmfights

I guess he wants to run a competitive race. His election was a fluke. I think Castro would get more votes than most republicans in that district and I am not even being funny. Gerrymandering has can produce ugly results.


39 posted on 11/13/2009 2:06:41 PM PST by Augustinian monk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Augustinian monk; Alex Murphy; All
In Cao’s district, 3 out of 4 voters chose Barack Obama in the 2008 presidential elections. In 2004, President Bush won only 24 percent of the vote here. Hello, give the man a break.

I would suggest the Republican Party stop funding people like this. If he is going to represent Democrats and vote with the Democrats, why should the Republican Party give him money to run? If the people in his district DON'T want a Republican conservative, then there are better places to spend the money.

40 posted on 11/13/2009 4:36:47 PM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD; Augustinian monk; Alex Murphy; All
I would suggest the Republican Party stop funding people like this. If he is going to represent Democrats and vote with the Democrats, why should the Republican Party give him money to run?

I agree to a point. Where I would make the exception is in those very blue districts that if the Pubs could win it would give them a majority and the House would be run by conservatives. I don't like it, but I recognize that I can't always get everything I want.

Where the Pubs fell apart was letting a minority in the party (rino's) dictate policy and letting the media/Rats shape their image. It didn't help that Bush was great on foreign policy but usually governed domestic policy like a liberal.

41 posted on 11/13/2009 5:30:26 PM PST by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: wmfights; Augustinian monk; Alex Murphy; All

It has become obvious that the media will bend over backwards for the Democrats. I think they’ve lost all credibility. Bush had a hard time but the next Republican won’t if he/she is smart.

The Republicans better get use to playing hard ball if we’re going to take back this country. That includes understanding the media is part of the problem and treating it as such.


42 posted on 11/13/2009 6:05:30 PM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD; Augustinian monk; Alex Murphy; All
The Republicans better get use to playing hard ball if we’re going to take back this country. That includes understanding the media is part of the problem and treating it as such.

This is so true!

I think the prospects are good that this will be the case. There are some solid conservatives working to transform the party (Jim DeMint comes to mind) and the Tea Bag movement has made it clear they want conservatives not a party, so if the Pubs get stupid (NY 23) they are willing to look elsewhere.

43 posted on 11/13/2009 7:09:03 PM PST by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson