Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Christian witness 'more credible' in union, writes Pope in letter to Eastern Patriarch
cna ^ | November 30, 2009

Posted on 12/01/2009 6:34:51 AM PST by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-140 next last
To: conservonator; Alex Murphy

Maybe Alex is PRO-poverty.


41 posted on 12/01/2009 2:20:14 PM PST by Heliand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: the_conscience

Ah. The old “long arm of Rome”. Always SOOOO effective in the Middle Ages. Especially during that Great Schism thingy, and the Conciliarist crisis, and in all relations with Russia and Constantinople, and of course, how can we forget, Rome’s great success in stopping that Reformation hootenanny?


42 posted on 12/01/2009 2:23:28 PM PST by Heliand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Heliand

Alex is a Calvinist so in the end we’re all just a bunch of meat puppets in the end anyway; what’s a little poverty between your pre and final destination?


43 posted on 12/01/2009 2:23:41 PM PST by conservonator (spill czeck is knot my friend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: conservonator
Alex is a Calvinist so we’re all just a bunch of meat puppets in the end anyway; what’s a little poverty between your pre and final destination?

I should read these before I post...

44 posted on 12/01/2009 2:25:10 PM PST by conservonator (spill czeck is knot my friend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: the_conscience
The context of the question was the 12th-16th century the hayday of equitible distrubution of rights.

Well, even the serfs of the 12th-16th centuries only had to pay a 20% tax, and had far more liberty and holidays than we do. The nobles got stuck with all that icky wars and fighting stuff that lead to things like getting your head chopped off or getting captured by Muslim slavers, while serfs just got to stay home and farm and make the occasional pilgrimage.

Everyone only had wood energy for cooking and heat, everyone ate pretty much the same food stuffs (no luxury imports beyond the occasional spice), houses differed mainly in size, and the Church provided what little medical care and education there was equally. I suppose the rich had linen underwear and the poor had to make do with wool, and the rich got to dye their clothes in fancier colors. How terrible.

45 posted on 12/01/2009 2:30:29 PM PST by Heliand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Heliand
There hasn't been a poll tax to support the Church in England for years. I don't know about anywhere else, given the very anti-clerical nature of many European governments I would be surprised if many countries haven't discontinued the practice, as has England.

That's not charity, though -- that's maintenance, something that's worked out between the secular government and the church. The government decides to support the church, the church is not holding a gun to anybody's head.

And don't tell me they hold the threat of excommunication. That's been shown to be SOOOO effective with CINO politicians!

46 posted on 12/01/2009 2:38:43 PM PST by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: conservonator

Its God’s will for you to be rich.


47 posted on 12/01/2009 2:41:28 PM PST by Heliand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: conservonator

So if you are poor, you must be a sinner.


48 posted on 12/01/2009 2:41:57 PM PST by Heliand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

Germany and Switzerland, for two examples have ecclesiastical poll taxes. The only way out from under them is to apostasize, so yes, you are excommunicated. They do far more than support maintenance of the Church - they pay for its social work as well, and go to support the Vatican. This is why the Vatican has been very close to Germany and the US in the past century - these are her two greatest sources of financial support due to the wealth of the Catholic people and their large numbers.


49 posted on 12/01/2009 2:45:06 PM PST by Heliand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Heliand

Sounds like a nice socialistic society.

How many serfs were able to rise above their station?


50 posted on 12/01/2009 2:48:59 PM PST by the_conscience (I'm a bigot: Against Jihadists and those who support despotism of any kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Heliand

But is the poll tax charged against everybody, or only Catholics? (I lived in Germany for a year, but I was an Episcopalian at the time, so what did I know?)


51 posted on 12/01/2009 2:52:35 PM PST by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: the_conscience
Actually, serfs were able to rise . . . with a little effort. At least in England, which is the medieval society I know best.

If you could get gone and stay gone for a year and a day, you were free. Also, if you could get to one of the larger cities and claim sanctuary, you were free.

Enterprising serfs could also become yeomen, through service to their lord, being rewarded with a franchise charter that declared them free.

One of the reasons England was freer than most of the other European countries. Upward mobility. You can read all about it in the chapter in Conan Doyle's White Company about Lady Tiphaine and the blessed hour of sight.

52 posted on 12/01/2009 3:02:48 PM PST by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother
If you could get gone and stay gone for a year and a day, you were free. Also, if you could get to one of the larger cities and claim sanctuary, you were free.

So you had to run away and hope you could get sanctuary or stay hid for a year and then you could be free. Hmmm...no natural rights just the ability to run away somehow affords someone freedom.

No, I prefer natural rights.

53 posted on 12/01/2009 3:11:10 PM PST by the_conscience (I'm a bigot: Against Jihadists and those who support despotism of any kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: the_conscience
Well of course natural rights, with a constitution forbidding the government to infringe on them, is a better situation.

But for medieval Europe, that was a darned good deal, nothing else even remotely like it at the time.

You left out the charter, which was the best way for folks who didn't want to run. But even if you ran, with communications the way they were in those days, and no law enforcement, it wasn't as hard as you'd think. Lots of people took advantage of the opportunity to vote with their feet. And it self-selected for folks with enterprise and daring, which made the yeoman class the bedrock of England, basically.

54 posted on 12/01/2009 3:23:24 PM PST by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother
Well of course natural rights, with a constitution forbidding the government to infringe on them, is a better situation.

At least that's one Romanist vote for natural rights.

Whew...I thought it was going to be a shutout.

55 posted on 12/01/2009 3:31:05 PM PST by the_conscience (I'm a bigot: Against Jihadists and those who support despotism of any kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Petronski; the_conscience
Have you seen the first three words of his tagline? Quite an admission.

GASP! Your post violates the single most important rule in all Internetdom! It's now in the running for "the most cowardly post of the week" award!

56 posted on 12/01/2009 3:57:13 PM PST by Alex Murphy ("Though He slay me, yet will I trust Him" - Job 13:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

He was already present on the thread, posting two minutes before me (and ten minutes after).

Don’t try to pull me into your sewer.


57 posted on 12/01/2009 4:04:22 PM PST by Petronski (Global warming is indeed man-made: it was created by man-made manipulation of the data.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

The Chihuahuah yapping is just background noise.


58 posted on 12/01/2009 4:04:24 PM PST by the_conscience (I'm a bigot: Against Jihadists and those who support despotism of any kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: the_conscience
The Chihuahuah yapping is just background noise.

Chihuahua? Nah, be fair to yourself.

You're more of a Yorkie.

59 posted on 12/01/2009 4:07:58 PM PST by Petronski (Global warming is indeed man-made: it was created by man-made manipulation of the data.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: the_conscience
You sure can't have read the Catechism.

Natural rights figure largely there. What makes you think that Catholics don't believe in natural rights? That's absurd. How could Charles Carroll of Carrollton have signed for Maryland if he didn't believe in natural rights?

60 posted on 12/01/2009 4:31:32 PM PST by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-140 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson