[Secret Agent Man]

Well, I don’t know the woman but for the sake of discussing this, I’ll approach my view of this accepting the premise she didn’t do anything to this photo.

There are several explanations that could be possible.

The camera malunctioned, and there is some kind of image there that appears to look like a person.

The photo was later messed up during processing (if it was on film) or being printed out on a printer, and there is some kind of image added that appears to look like a person.

The photo was not doctored, and there is some kind of image there that appears to look like a person.

If it is genuine, I’d say the image is demonic. There’s no reason for Christ to have to appear as a smudgy apparition in some woman’s photograph. The face of this person looks distorted and bloody. Christ is no longer beaten and bloody. In fact Christ resurrected in His physical body that is now immortal and perfect, He is not an apparition nor would He appear this way. There is no need to. And especially to appear weak, even if this is in the area of His atoning death.

Christ is coming back in power and glory and everyone is going to KNOW it when it occurs. He is coming back powerful, and mighty, as King. Not like this.

[ozark hilljilly]

If it is genuine, I’d say the image is demonic. There’s no reason for Christ to have to appear as a smudgy apparition in some woman’s photograph. The face of this person looks distorted and bloody. Christ is no longer beaten and bloody.

THANK YOU! My point exactly, but you say so much more eloquently. And I'm with you with the demonic aspect. Ponder your initial reaction when you saw this: a little freaked out? creeped out? puzzled? If it was truly of God your reaction would be so much different.

[IronKros]

Demonic?

Was this a demonic snack chip?

Beware the anti-chessus!

[GiovannaNicoletta]

If it is genuine, I’d say the image is demonic. There’s no reason for Christ to have to appear as a smudgy apparition in some woman’s photograph. The face of this person looks distorted and bloody. Christ is no longer beaten and bloody. In fact Christ resurrected in His physical body that is now immortal and perfect, He is not an apparition nor would He appear this way. There is no need to. And especially to appear weak, even if this is in the area of His atoning death.

Christ is coming back in power and glory and everyone is going to KNOW it when it occurs. He is coming back powerful, and mighty, as King. Not like this.

This is exactly what I thought when I looked at the picture. If this is an actual image, and not some distortion of something else, then it is demonic and is designed to deceive.

Christ is King of all Kings and Lord of all Lords and you're right, there will be no mistaking that fact when He returns to reclaim His creation and establish His kingdom.

[MayflowerMadam]

“If it is genuine, I’d say the image is demonic.”

Agree. My cousin is a Baptist pastor in Italy. They see a lot of freaky stuff that gets the locals in a big stirred-up frenzy believing they’re seeing signs from God. Crying statues. Bleeding statues. (No burned toast stories — so far.) Most likely demonic activity intended to confuse.

[ichabod1]

Christ is no longer beaten and bloody. In fact Christ resurrected in His physical body that is now immortal and perfect, He is not an apparition nor would He appear this way. There is no need to.

He is the King of Glow-reh!