Skip to comments."Progressive" Priests Reject Pope's Bishop Pick in Spain
Posted on 12/21/2009 2:03:01 PM PST by markomalley
SAN SEBASTIÁN, Spain, December 19, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The appointment of Bishop José Ignacio Munilla to the diocese of San Sebastian in northern Spain, has been repudiated in a letter signed by a majority of priests of the diocese.
Since the rejection early in 2009 by the Austrian bishops conference of the pope's pick for bishop of Linz, some European bishops and priests have stepped up their defiance of papal wishes on appointments and Catholic teaching.
The letter said that Bishop Munilla is "not suitable" for the post and said the appointment would "discredit the ecclesiastical life of our diocese." It was signed by 131 priests, nearly 80 per cent of the diocese's complement. The letter is believed to be politically motivated, given that the Catholic Church in the Basque region is known for its "progressive" stands and its sympathy for the Basque separatist movement.
Bishop Munilla is known for his "conservatism" and was the choice of both Pope Benedict and Madrid Cardinal Antonio Maria Rouco, head of the Spanish bishops' conference. At a book launch, Munilla called for the respect of parental rights in the education of their children as the government considers a proposal to remove crucifixes from public schools and is working to impose pro-homosexual sex education.
Munilla explains the Catechism of the Catholic Church every day on Radio Maria Spain, and is a prolific columnist on religion. He is set to be installed as bishop of San Sebastian on January 9.
San Sebastian is the capital city of the province of Gipuzkoa, in the Basque country of Spain. Inigo Urkullu Renteria, a Basque nationalist politician and president of the Basque Nationalist Party (PNV) said, "The imposition" of Bishop Munilla is a sign of an ideological trend "in the Catholic Church in Spain and Rome."
Arbil Forum, an organization that defends "Christian values in society," has defended the new bishop of San Sebastian, criticizing the "intolerance" of the pastors who signed a statement against the new prelate. "A bishop should be appointed by the Pope for transmitting the gospel and not the disclosure of a particular vision of a political group," the group said.
In related news, the president elect of the Swiss Catholic Bishops Conference has told media that priests should be allowed to marry and that this opinion is shared by most of his brother bishops.
Bishop Norbert Brunner told a Swiss newspaper, "There should be the possibility of making married men priests." He argued that there is "no fundamental link" between celibacy and the priesthood, and said that the Swiss bishops were "quite unanimous" in their support for a married clergy.
Like the Austrian bishops who earlier this year rejected Pope Benedict's selection of a doctrinally orthodox priest as auxiliary bishop in the ultraliberal diocese of Linz, Brunner, head of the diocese of Sion, is an adherent of the concept of "national" churches. This doctrine that is taking hold among many episcopal conferences and priests in Europe, holds that the central authority of the Church Rome is incapable of understanding the needs of the "local church."
Bishop Brunner said at the Synod of Bishops in 2001, "Once again we ask, with serious preoccupation, what value do the pastoral needs of the local churches have for the Roman curia?
"At the universal level of the church, only what is necessary for the unity of the church should be resolved centrally," Brunner said.
Read related LSN coverage:
Pope Asks Bishops of Scandal-Riven Austrian Church for Fidelity to the Faith
Um? I'm not Catholic, but the RCC isn't a democracy. AFAIK, the local priests don't get a veto over the Vatican's chosen bishop over them (although, as a purely practical matter, the Holy See certainly takes local concerns, "popularity," into account, among other things ... like doctrinal correctness!).
Bp Munilla is just what they need there, but the Church has been tolerating the Marxist Basque-separatist clergy for so long that it’s going to be hard to make a dent in them. The former bishop of this diocese actually snubbed the funerals of ETA victims, so committed was he to the Basque-separatist Communist cause of ETA.
JPII tolerated way too much of this, and it’s one of the big reasons that I seriously question the rush to canonize him.
Let’s pray that BXVI acts firmly and decisively. The Benedictine Motto is “When It’s Pruned, It Grows”
The newly appointed auxiliary bishop resigned in the face of the clergy rebellion, the Vatican accepted it and the status quo was maintained. I'm not aware of any of the rebellious clergy being disciplined or rebuked.
So is the present Pope really any different in his approach? What should he in fact do? Persist with the appointment, have the priests go on strike or perform some other act of rebellion and then suspend the lot of them? It's problematic when one priest rebels but when a whole diocese goes nuts, what should be done?
I think both this Pope and his predecessor are taking a longer term approach to the problem in the belief that it will be self-correcting as the sands of time run their course.
I think BXVI tries a little harder than JPII, although he has a Vatican where a large number of the supporting cast is stacked heavily against him and still longs for the soft-leftwing days of JPII. At least BXVI appointed somebody good to begin with in Linz, although I think he underestimated the rebelliousness of the clergy and bishops and I suspect he has learned from the experience.
The bishops in the Basque Country have been a scandal for decades. Ratzinger, when JPII was Pope, did manage to get a grip on some of the more spectacular Latin American abuses, but JPII was very weak on demanding orthodoxy from European bishops and the only people he ever seriously punished were the SSPX.
We shall see where this one goes. Many of the Spanish bishops are determined not to let the leftist clergy of Pais Vasco get away with it, so I think he may get some support from them. Also, the Church is doing very poorly in all the places (Basque Country and Catalonia) where there is a nationalist movement, at least in part because it has come to be seen as simply another part of the Marxist separatist movement. That’s why things like Jehovah’s Witnesses and Mormons are getting a toehold in these places.
Excommunicate them, cut off their money.
And I’m not even Catholic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.