Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Magi and the Star -- Epiphany Explored
CatholicExchange.com ^ | January 4, 2010 | Michael J. Miller

Posted on 01/06/2010 9:47:58 AM PST by Salvation

The Magi and the Star

January 4th, 2010 by Michael J. Miller

During a 2007 BBC radio interview, the archbishop of Canterbury deconstructed elements of the Nativity story. "Stars simply don’t behave like that," Rowan Williams said. Asked about the existence of three wise men, he replied, "It works quite well as legend."

But years ago Father Walter Brandmüller, president of the Pontifical Committee for Historical Sciences, published an essay applying the historical-critical method to the question of the Nativity story. (The essay is reprinted without cumbersome footnotes in Light and Shadows: Church History Amid Faith, Fact, and Legend [Ignatius].) He found that an unbiased examination of the historical evidence for the Nativity does not undermine, but corroborates, Christian Tradition.

Brandmüller cites the Anglican scholar J.A.T. Robinson, whose 1976 study Redating the New Testament challenged the 19th-century "scientific" consensus that the Gospels were written after 70 A.D. The late dating conveniently gave Scripture scholars maximum latitude for their speculations. Robinson points out that the Acts of the Apostles (the sequel to Luke) do not mention the deaths of Peter and Paul (circa 67) or the Roman-Judean war, which started in 66. Based on a careful evaluation of both internal and external evidence, he concludes that all four Gospels were written before 70 A.D.

Brandmüller comments: "The fact that the Gospels not only are based on eyewitness and hearsay reports but also were written for contemporaries made it impossible to include fictional accounts, which could have been exposed at any time as untrue by contemporaries who were still living."

He then presents the documentary and monumental evidence for the census of Caesar Augustus and the archaeological traces of Christ’s birth in Bethlehem. "The mere fact that Emperor Hadrian found it necessary to replace the most popular Christian shrines with pagan temples so as to eradicate all thoughts of Christian salvation history-he even had a grove in honor of Adonis planted over the Grotto of the Nativity-shows that the memory of Jesus’ birth was very much alive at the beginning of the second century." Relying on the local tradition, Emperor Constantine had a church built over the grotto in the fourth century. "The Church of the Nativity is still standing there today."

The birth of Christ is anchored in time and space at least as securely as most other events in antiquity. Nevertheless, many people still balk at the story of the Magi and the Star. Over the centuries Christian writers have produced a bewildering array of explanations, many of them extremely fanciful. But they do not discredit the Gospel account any more than antiquated theories about crystalline spheres and interstellar ether disprove Kepler’s laws of planetary motion.

To help sift through the interpretations of the Magi and the Star, let’s consult the commentary on the Gospel of Matthew by Cornelius à Lapide, S.J. (1567-1637), a Scripture scholar who taught and wrote in Rome. His encyclopedic work compiles opinions and excerpts from patristic, medieval, and contemporary commentators.

Who were the Magi? Father à Lapide notes that magi "is a common word among the Persians…meaning philosophers. The word seems to be Hebrew in origin…. The Chaldeans, following the Hebrews, were accustomed to call their philosophers Magi, according to Saint Jerome." Pliny and Tertullian also testify that Near Eastern peoples generally applied the name magi to their wise men and astrologers. (Therefore, when Matthew writes magi he does not necessarily refer to the hereditary Zoroastrian priesthood.)

What was their country of origin? Some Church Fathers "think that they came from Persia…. But the distance would seem too great…. Others [Jerome included] with more probability think that the Magi were Chaldeans…because [they] were addicted to astrology." Chaldea (Babylonia) was located along the Euphrates River, in the eastern third of the Fertile Crescent. À Lapide, however, deems it most probable that they were eastern Arabians. He cites Psalm 71[72]:10 in the Vulgate, "the kings of the Arabians and of Saba shall bring gifts," and Pliny’s observation, "Nowhere is there frankincense except in Arabia."

But the arguments for Arabia are weak. Trade routes crisscrossed the ancient Near East, and frankincense (like champagne) can be selected as a gift regardless of one’s nationality. In many translations Psalm 72:10 is a generic prayer for prosperity, not a prophecy. It is "fulfilled" in Matthew 2 only if you assume what à Lapide is trying to prove.

Jerome’s opinion is weighty because he was a multilingual scholar who worked in Rome and Bethlehem. Moreover, the Chaldeans had been keeping astronomical almanacs for centuries before the birth of Christ.

What was the Star? À Lapide’s commentary lists the possibilities: a comet, "certain signs in the stars," the Holy Ghost in visible form (as at Christ’s baptism), an angel, a nova, or "a new meteor formed by the angels out of air, and filled with an immense light…like the pillar of fire and cloud which guided the Hebrews through the desert." In advocating the last-mentioned hypothesis, à Lapide relies on an Old Testament parallel instead of examining the text of Matthew’s Gospel.

The Magi were "from the east" (Matt. 2:1), a plural expression in Greek: literally, "from the eastern parts." But when they say, "We have seen his star in the east" (v. 2), this expression is singular. In both Greek and Latin its primary meaning is "in the ascent" or "at its rising." This is technical astronomical language. It’s time to consult the astronomers.

Again, there are many theories about the Star of Bethlehem. Here are three of the most recent.

Michael R. Molnar, citing Ptolemy’s Tetrabiblos , argues that the constellation Aries governed the Herodian monarchy in Judea, and on April 17, 6 B.C., Jupiter rose "in the east" in that sign of the zodiac, along with the sun and Venus. Unfortunately, Ptolemy’s astrological work was written a century later than the Gospels.

Frederick A. Larson, an Evangelical Christian lawyer and founder of The STAR Project , has synthesized astronomical findings, historical records, and scriptural allusions in an impressive video presentation that can be accessed online. He helpfully rules out several celestial objects: comets don’t rise; the nova recorded in 5 B.C. by Chinese observers would have been visible in Jerusalem, too, whereas Herod had to inquire about the time of the star’s appearance.

Larson identifies the Star of Bethlehem with conjunctions of Jupiter and Venus in the constellation Leo as an intensified "Morning Star" and "Evening Star" in 3 and 2 B.C., respectively. Between those two events, as Jupiter traveled across the night sky, its retrograde wobble made it appear to pass Regulus ("ruler"), the brightest star in Leo, three times back and forth. "The Planet of Kings dance[d] out a halo above the Star of Kings."

As spectacular as these coincidences are, when viewed with astronomy software, they are historically implausible. Pagan astronomers would not have associated Leo with "the lion of Judah" (Gen. 49:9). Even the expert Chaldeans charted the movements of Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn only, since the proximity of Venus to the sun made methodical observations too difficult and imprecise.

Without computer simulations or sextants, the Magi could only observe the reappearance of a planet in the eastern sky, note its "stationary points" and its setting in the evening, record the dates, and then count the days between recurring events. Larson’s theory is just too sophisticated for their methods. It fails by a criterion that he does not mention: the Star of Bethlehem had to be predictable in order to be astrologically significant.

The late Austrian astronomer Konradin Ferrari d’Occhieppo collected and published much new evidence for the planetary conjunction hypothesis. The theory that the Star of Bethlehem was a foreseeable conjunction of Jupiter and Saturn goes way back: it is found in the writings of the medieval polymath Cardinal Pierre d’Ailly and the 17th-century astronomer Kepler (although they looked for it in the wrong years).

Ferrari studied the Babylonian calendar tablets for the year 7/6 B.C. At least four different original copies still exist-implying unusual interest in the celestial phenomena that they predicted: Jupiter and Saturn were to rise in the east on the same evening, September 15, 7 B.C., and have a triple conjunction in the sign of Pisces. "There is no doubt that the Babylonian astronomers of that time, from their knowledge of long planetary cycles, had a full understanding of the extraordinary rarity of the circumstances of that configuration."

The Magi could have reasoned astrologically as follows: Jupiter was the planet of their highest deity, Marduk. From the eighth century B.C. onward Saturn was associated with the Jews, and central Pisces with Palestine. The appearance of the star thus signified the birth of a Messianic King in the West, about whom the Babylonians, too, had speculated for ages.

This would have been sufficient reason for the Magi to journey to Jerusalem, without any visual guidance. When Herod’s scribes told them to travel five miles to Bethlehem, they set out due south along the main road at dusk. Directly ahead of them Jupiter (with Saturn) shone brilliantly in the southern sky, standing at the top of the cone of zodiacal light (an oval haze caused by sunlight reflected from interplanetary dust). For three hours Bethlehem’s skyline was silhouetted against that glow, which appeared to pour down from "the star." "And behold the star…went before them, until it came and stood over where the child was."

Brandmüller recalls that the Old Syrian version of Matthew’s Gospel translates "star" with the usual name for Jupiter. "And seeing the star they rejoiced with exceeding great joy."

Magi or astrologers from the East are well documented figures in ancient history. There are several plausible astronomical candidates for the Star of Bethlehem. If you accept the planetary conjunction hypothesis elaborated by Ferrari d’Occhieppo, then cuneiform tablets recording data calculated years in advance confirm the Matthean account in minute detail.

The venerable Greek liturgy testifies to the importance of this event in the early Church. In an oft-repeated hymn, the Troparion for Christmas, the faithful sing: "Your Nativity, O Christ our God, has shown to the world the light of wisdom; for by it, those who worshipped the stars were taught by a star to adore You, the Sun of Righteousness, and to know You, the Orient [Rising] from on high. O Lord, glory be to You."

[This article originally appeared in Catholic World Report and is used by permission of the author.]

Michael J. Miller is a free-lance translator, editor and writer for the Catholic press. He translated two books by Joseph Ratzinger, Church, Ecumenism & Politics: New Endeavors in Ecclesiology (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2008) and Europe Today and Tomorrow (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2008).


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; History; Theology
KEYWORDS: anglican; archaeoastronomy; catholic; christmas; epiphany; godsgravesglyphs; johanneskepler; star; starofbethlehem; staroftheeast
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
A different approach to the Star of Bethlehem.
1 posted on 01/06/2010 9:47:59 AM PST by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; Lady In Blue; NYer; ELS; Pyro7480; livius; Catholicguy; RobbyS; markomalley; ...
Since today is the day most of the world celebrates the Epiphany, I decided to post this.
2 posted on 01/06/2010 9:50:19 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zot

Date for gospels uses your reasoning.


3 posted on 01/06/2010 9:51:02 AM PST by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

science and astrology ping — for whoever has those lists.


4 posted on 01/06/2010 10:04:44 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

http://www.bethlehemstar.com/

Marvelous research and info here. You’ll like it.


5 posted on 01/06/2010 10:08:55 AM PST by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah; Eric Blair; sig226

Science and Astronomy Ping!


6 posted on 01/06/2010 10:15:56 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Thanks! This is the best explanation I’ve read.


7 posted on 01/06/2010 11:05:39 AM PST by mrreaganaut (Sticks and stones may break my bones, but lawyer jokes are actionable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut

Epiphany ping!


8 posted on 01/06/2010 11:06:52 AM PST by mrreaganaut (Sticks and stones may break my bones, but lawyer jokes are actionable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

This is a great explanation, Salvation. Thanks for posting it.


9 posted on 01/06/2010 11:10:39 AM PST by Titanites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Chuck Missler, (Koinonia House,) has some interesting information on the Nativity story and the true origin of the Magi. Seems Daniel was probably involved ahead of time.
10 posted on 01/06/2010 12:40:55 PM PST by blues_guitarist (Snipers wanted . . . heh, heh, heh! . . . . . . black & humble . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Outstanding; thanks!


11 posted on 01/06/2010 2:08:32 PM PST by glide625
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar; zot

I’d like to hear more about that reasoning for the gospels dating. I’ve long suspected they are considerably older than the academics time line.


12 posted on 01/06/2010 2:15:43 PM PST by glide625
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Just because the ancients might not have associated Leo with the Lion of Judah (and this writing does not even support that statement with any evidence) does not mean that we, today, cannot appreciate this fact based on where the plants were aligned.

I had to use that software in my astronomy class and I believe the Star of Bethlehem had so many good points, why are you trying to badmouth it?


13 posted on 01/06/2010 6:36:51 PM PST by Paved Paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

Thanks for the ping. This is an excellent article.


14 posted on 01/06/2010 9:51:33 PM PST by zot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paved Paradise

Just posting the article. I am only the messenger. I realize that there were many good points about the Star of Bethlehem. I just thought thw science and astonomy in this thread was interesting.

Are there specific points with which you disagree? Agree?


15 posted on 01/06/2010 10:01:56 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: glide625; GreyFriar

The basic reasoning is as stated in this article: there is no way the Gospels or Acts would have failed to indicate the writer’s knowledge of the Jewish rebellion (AD 66) or the destruction of Jerusalem (AD 70). Many academics date the Gospels later than AD 70 because they do not believe Jesus could have predicted the destruction of Jerusalem.


16 posted on 01/06/2010 10:02:39 PM PST by zot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Paved Paradise

Did you miss this line?

**He found that an unbiased examination of the historical evidence for the Nativity does not undermine, but corroborates, Christian Tradition.**


17 posted on 01/06/2010 10:03:54 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Regarding your two posts, I realize that the author of that article was promoting the historical evidence for the Nativity and I also realize that you are just the messenger and apologize that I was hasty in my posting and didn’t specify that. My beef was that the author seemed to be rather negative of Larson and “The Star of Bethlehem” because he was so adamant about what the Magi could have seen and known back then since they didn’t have the modern computer simulations and my response to that is, “duh.” Of course, but now that WE can see what was going on relative to the conjunctions and positions of the various astronomical bodies during that year, WE can be blessed by this information (e.g., the Lion - Leo and Lion of Judah). That was my beef with the article primarily.

I wish he had only written his article a little more positively. Larson did a good thing and my sneaking suspicion is that it is another Catholic bashing a Protestant (sorry, Salvation, just my 2 cents).


18 posted on 01/07/2010 7:31:48 AM PST by Paved Paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Michael R. Molnar, citing Ptolemy’s Tetrabiblos , argues that the constellation Aries governed the Herodian monarchy in Judea, and on April 17, 6 B.C., Jupiter rose "in the east" in that sign of the zodiac, along with the sun and Venus. Unfortunately, Ptolemy’s astrological work was written a century later than the Gospels.

I read Molnar's book, which was quite interesting in spelling out the state of astrology in the Hellenistic world around the time of Christ. I'm not sure why Ptolemy's book being a century later than the Gospels is dispositive of Molnar's interesting thesis about the constellation Aries.

19 posted on 01/07/2010 7:36:08 AM PST by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

And Merry Christmas to all Julian Calendar Christians today!!!


20 posted on 01/07/2010 9:17:34 AM PST by eleni121 (For Jesus did not give us a timid spirit , but a spirit of power, of love and of self-discipline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson