Skip to comments.LDS books: Oxford Press finds profits in prophets
Posted on 01/15/2010 10:13:03 AM PST by Colofornian
Bouncing around on the trend-tossed seas of 21st-century book publishing, Mormon scholarship seems to have docked at the granddaddy of all prestigious presses: Oxford University.
By all accounts, the unlikely partnership between the oldest university in the English-speaking world and an upstart American faith seems to be working. Mormon writers, particularly historians, get the academic credibility they crave and Oxford sells a lot of books.
Two years ago, Oxford University Press published Massacre at Mountain Meadows by Ronald W. Walker, Richard E. Turley Jr. and Glen M. Leonard, three LDS Church scholars. The harrowing account of the 1857 slaughter of 120 unarmed men, women and children by Mormons in southern Utah met Oxford's standards for thorough, honest research and evenhanded narratives -- and it sold thousands.
"Every university press in the country, if not the world, went in the red in 2008, but Oxford made money and it was the Mountain Meadows book that was the margin of difference," says Jack Welch, editor of Brigham Young University Studies. "So everybody was happy with that."
Oxford has issued more than a dozen Mormon volumes, from Richard Bushman's Mormonism: A Very Short Introduction to C. Mark Hamilton's Nineteenth-Century Mormon Architecture & City Planning.
This spring it will release a literary analysis of The Book of Mormon by Grant Hardy, an LDS professor of history and religious studies at the University of North Carolina in Asheville. Next year it will bring out a biography of early LDS apostle Parley P. Pratt and is considering a Handbook of Mormonism and possibly a multi-volume history of LDS theology. Every proposal is reviewed by established experts in the field, Mormons and others, to meet the publisher's scholarly requirements.
"People in the academy are beginning to have a broader view of Mormonism, not just as some sort of fringe group," says Cynthia Read, Oxford executive editor. "As an outsider, I see a desire on the part of the church to be more mainstream and transparent."
The internationally respected publisher didn't set out to corner the market in Mormon studies, says Read, who manages Oxford's acclaimed "Religion in America" series. But since there is no more American religion than Mormonism, "it was a natural for our list."
Long before Oxford discovered Mormonism, however, other publishers understood the importance and marketability of its founding prophet and history.
View beyond the mountains » In the mid-20th century, academic or trade presses outside of LDS population centers published important books on Mormonism.
In 1945, Alfred A. Knopf offered No Man Knows My History, Fawn Brodie's provocative profile of Joseph Smith. Five years later, Stanford University Press brought out Juanita Brooks' groundbreaking history, Mountain Meadows Massacre. In 1957, University of Chicago marketed Thomas O'Dea's sociological masterpiece, The Mormons, and the next year Harvard issued Leonard Arrington's magnum opus, Great Basin Kingdom: An Economic History of Latter-day Saints 1830- 1900.
By and large, these were single books, not the development of a "series" or a publisher's "list."
That didn't happen until the 1970s, when Elizabeth Dulaney began to build a Mormon studies fiefdom at the University of Illinois Press. For almost three decades, Illinois churned out some of the most important works in Mormon history, including Jan Shipps' seminal exploration, Mormonism: The Story of a New Religious Tradition and Bushman's Joseph Smith and the Beginnings of Mormonism.
Illinois played a "crucial role in establishing the study of Mormonism, especially history, as a legitimate topic for serious scholars," says Philip L. Barlow, a Harvard-trained scholar who now is a professor of Mormon studies at Utah State University.
For nearly 30 years, the Midwest university dominated the LDS scholarly book world.
The British behemoth » Yet it was Oxford that published Barlow's book, Mormons and the Bible: The Place of the Latter-day Saints in American Religion, as its first foray into LDS history. Next the press picked up Terryl Givens' The Viper on the Hearth: Mormons, Myths, and the Construction of Heresy. Both books received national acclaim and brisk sales, which gave Oxford confidence that its Mormon gamble paid off.
Meanwhile, Dulaney retired from Illinois so LDS authors turned elsewhere. A certain momentum developed as Oxford's weight in the academic and publishing worlds began to affect the landscape. Now other university presses, including Columbia, Yale, North Carolina and Oklahoma, are entering the market.
Academic as well as general interest in Mormonism never has been higher, says Givens, professor of literature and religion at the University of Richmond in Virginia.
"So many scholars inside and outside the church are now doing world-class work on the tradition," says Givens, who has published a half-dozen books with Oxford and has signed on for several more. "In addition to a general readership interested in things Mormon, members are voracious consumers of their own history."
Oxford is standing ready to pile their plates high -- with only the most seasoned dishes, of course.
Ah, the first true 9/11 terrorist act on domestic soil. Mormons executing at close range 120 children aged 8 & up, their mothers & their fathers. How many were convicted for this crime? (One) Even an Lds bishop ex-communicated for this horrific massacre was later re-institated by Lds leaders. (And here Lds has taught for the longest time that murder was an unforgiveable sin)
From the article: ...general interest in Mormonism never has been higher, says Givens, professor of literature and religion at the University of Richmond in Virginia..."In addition to a general readership interested in things Mormon, members are voracious consumers of their own history."
Ah, secondary reasons as to why so many Lds-related articles are worth posting on FR: (1) general interest in all things Mormon "has never been higher"; and (2) Lds "members are voracious consumers of their own history" -- primarily because in my view, the Lds church itself either ignores its historical warts (& worse) + skews what it does present.
Anyway, FReepers should post more Lds true historical accounts knowing they'll have a "voracious" Lds readership!
From the article: In 1945, Alfred A. Knopf offered No Man Knows My History, Fawn Brodie's provocative profile of Joseph Smith. Five years later, Stanford University Press brought out Juanita Brooks' groundbreaking history, Mountain Meadows Massacre. (Yes, I recommend these books)
From the article: Next year it will bring out a biography of early LDS apostle Parley P. Pratt...
Hmm...this one might be interesting. Parley P. had a dozen wives, one of whom was still married to the man when Pratt brought her back out West from Arkansas-Louisiana area. Pratt met her as an apostle-missionary of the Lds church; and while in Arkansas, was tracked down by the provoked husband, who killed him. Parley P.'s brother was fellow apostle, Orson Pratt, the direct ancestor of Mitt Romney.
Mormons executing at close range 120 children aged 8 & up
Plus some infants in their mothers arms...
Notice no LDS has come on to defend/deny anything.
another single issue poster alert
It's only been 3 hours: maybe they are dissembling...
Givens, professor of literature and religion at the University of Richmond in Virginia...In addition to a general readership interested in things Mormon, members are voracious consumers of their own history.
Given what happens to a LOT of them we see on FR; after they find OUT about the history; they find that MORMONism becomes history in their lives.
Don't DENY it; you're here to DEFEND Mormonism - right?
IF not;then Resty can use her PING list which ALWAYS gets a MASSIVE responsive from the Faithful...
Posted to wrong thread I thought it was the BYU computer thread!
MR Hen there is nothing to deny or defend it is about scholars doing what scholars do....
Research and publish are you anti free enterprise
I’m pro free enterprise and pro free press - but you are ignoring the Mountain Meadows Massacre, and failing to deny or defend it.
What is to ignore I been commenting for years on it it is in the FR archives.
You aints want to try to impy or blame BY and history says other wise!
John Lee did not take counsel from the prophet John Lee followed his own fears!
Just admit your enmity for LDS drives you & your co hort to do this kind of viper work!