Skip to comments.THE TABLE OF NATIONS (GENEALOGY OF MANKIND) AND THE ORIGIN OF RACES (HISTORY OF MAN)
Posted on 02/12/2010 10:48:23 PM PST by bogusname
The history of the races of mankind is a fascinating subject. Biologically, a race is generally thought of as a variety, or subspecies, within a given species. All the races are a part of the human race. We have made the term race to apply to skin color, but the dictionary defines race as "a class or kind of individuals with common characteristics, interests, appearances, or habits as if derived from a common ancestor."
Where did we come from? The answers have always been with us, as presented in the original Table of Nations. What you are about to read can best be described as an Exegesis (from the Greek exégesis, verb: exégetikos, meaning interpretation, guide, translation or critical exposition). Once you have read what is presented here, you may not view any race of people the same way again. Note that there is nothing like the Table of Nations (as presented here) in any other national tradition. Here we are presented the origin of nations...
(Excerpt) Read more at soundchristian.com ...
uhh, when did they find a dinosaur footprint overlapping a human one, I have heard nothing of this. Also where are the cave paintings depicting dinosaurs?
Really? Where ya been hiding? :-) Those things have been around for years. Just google it and look around a bit. There are tons of sites with pictures of all sorts of things along that line.
Why does Genesis describe two different days of flesh humans being created/formed? And the reason Noah was ‘elected’ to be the one to carry forth the bloodline to Christ?
Question #1) It doesn’t
Question #2) Noah was the only righteous man in that generation.
I perceive that you are either from the “angels slept with women” group or the “aliens(what we think are angels) slept with women” group.
Well, pretty babies!
ping for later
angels ...slept with women group...
Like some Jews believe?
I love reading Josephus myself but I don’t listen to men when their stories contradict the Lord’s and you shouldn’t either. Why is it today that people need a little something extra outside of the Bible to maintain their faith? Because in the last days people will not be able to tolerate sound doctrine and will prefer fables as supposing them easier to believe.
Matthew 22:30 At the resurrection people will neither marry nor be given in marriage; they will be like the angels in heaven.
Angels don’t marry. They never have and they never will. Stop looking for extra unsupported knowledge to prop up your faith. Simply look to Christ. The “saved group” is the only one you need to be in. Stop drinking milk and start eating solid food. It’s time to mature.
So, they'll be "living in sin," huh? "Slapping their nasties together" without benefit of a marriage license?
Nah, homosexuals are excluded from heaven altogether. All of them and their nasties will be in hell...so you might want to think about repentance.
i have—several times. pro-evolution scientists would ignore any evidence that doesn’t marry up with their pre-conceived findings.
no nasties in heaven period . hetero or homo. :-)
You’re exactly right!
I did not Write what the Heavenly Father had Moses pen. There is at least a thousand years between when Genesis 1:26 took place and when Genesis 2:7 took place. Peter tells us how long a *day* with the Lord is. (IIPeter 3:8 But beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that ONE day with the LORD as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.) And in Genesis 5:27 Methuselah lived 969 years, not quite one *day* with the Lord. As in Genesis 6:3 The Heavenly Father told Moses to pen, And the LORD said, "My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years."
Genesis 6:9 THESE are THE GENERATIONS OF NOAH: Noah was a just man and *perfect* in his generations, and Noah walked with God.
The verse says that Noah's family history, was perfect or *without blemish as to breed or pedigree, as All flesh had been corrupted but Noah's family.
The word 'the' Adam means in the prime to show blood (in the face), i.e. flush or turn rosy: - be (dyed, made) red (ruddy)
DNA demonstrates that there is NO way all of the Heavenly Father's children came from only two flesh beings.
And I did not write the book of Jude. Oh and even Christ said as one of the signs of His return would be as in the days of Noah... we are not there there yet.
I respect your effort to be smart but your ideas are silly they won’t stand up against the truth. Be careful who you preach this false doctrine to. If some foolish person believes you and by some miracle you’re saved, you will be called the least in Heaven. By deliberately misinterpreting the Bible to fit your own chosen theory you are breaking one of God’s commandments.
Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
I am NOT hunting your respect, I did NOT Write what was Written. I did not 'choose' a theory, I take very serious every WORD and keep finding the literal physical evidence found all over this earth was left for the purpose of giving credibility to what was Written.
Could you please tell me in ALL of the Scripture where at any point and time when the children were following the instructions of the Heavenly Father, HE allowed another way to replace what they preach? See now something is wrong with what is taught about a young earth, and only two peoples being the historical parents of all of the Heavenly Father's children to have come to 'TOE' being the law of the land.
If you believe what you think is “literal physical evidence” over a sound interpretation of the Bible you are no different than the Darwin crowd.
This creation is only 6000 years old just as the Bible clearly indicates. The Bible is true as written and you don’t have to mangle it’s verses to fit what you think the “evidence” says.
We did come from those two original human beings Adam and Eve. If you find something that simple is hard to believe then how can you believe the record of Christ unto salvation?
You had better accept God’s word as being true as written. Your eternal life depends on it.
Ignoring the Written WORD is NOT sound interpretation of the Bible. And 99% is ignored to call sound *interpretation* what the Heavenly Father again and again said otherwise.
IITimothy 3:16 *ALL* Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
Peter (IIPeter 3) says to be mindful of the words which were spoken before by the holy prophets, and of the commandment of us the apostles of the Lord and Saviour:
Moses was the first 'holy prophet' but only gave a portion of doctrine, and other prophets filled in what he did not give. Solomon in Ecclesiastes said "the thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun. And Peter says there are three different heaven/earth ages. The one that WAS which "For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the *WORD* of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water:....
Whereby the world that then *was*, being overflowed with water, perished:.... Now check out what Genesis 1:2 says about what happened to this earth before anything was reported to be created...And the earth was (should be the word *became*) without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. (Deep what?) And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
It says what it says NO matter what others might call sound to the contrary.
Quoting verses you don’t understand isn’t helping your case. You’re throwing anything you can find against wall in hopes that something will stick. You’ve resorted to this because you know you are losing the battle. You’re not at all stable with this weird evolution/creation mix you believe in and you know it. The Scriptures won’t support that belief so you’re feeling the loss. You need to believe all of God’s word as written and not just a few verses you pull out of context and misinterpret to fit your new man made and Darwin influenced religion.
Now, as much as I’d love to go on hearing your confusion I have to hang up at the moment. I have things to do and it’s apparent you prefer to remain wrong. I don’t mean to sound harsh but I can see you don’t believe and I have to go spend time with some people that do. They’re waiting on me. I sincerely hope you find your way someday because right now you’re quite lost.
One thing I do NOT believe in or about is evolution. And your chart showing so call linage of flesh upon this earth from ‘the’ Adam and all the Heavenly Father’s children is evolution in quick time.
Do you teach that ‘the’ Adam and Eve shared an apple?
Jesus was dressing down the Sadducee for their seven brothers one wife story and what will happen in the resurrection. Jesus says nothing about Satan or fallen Angels. But in "Gen 6:4 Now giants were upon the earth in those days. For after the sons of God went in to the daughters of men, and they brought forth children, these are the mighty men of old, men of renown." Since "sons of God" is used for a term for Angels and the text indicates the procreation results into a hybrid being it is not unreasonable to believe that the fallen angels did this. Peter says "2Pe 2:4 For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but delivered them, drawn down by infernal ropes to the lower hell, unto torments, to be reserved unto judgment: 2Pe 2:5 And spared not the original world, but preserved Noe, the eighth person, the preacher of justice, bringing in the flood upon the world of the ungodly." Was the procreation between angels and women a part of the reason for the flood? Could "Gen 6:9 These are the generations of Noe: Noe was a just and perfect man in his generations, he walked with God. " mean Noah genealogy was not polluted?
Hold with the sermon daug. I’ve been rethinking this subject indepencently and let me add that all that you wrote I’ve already considered many times over many years. This very day I watched the latest Hal Lindsey video and lo and behold he was talking about the angels with women thing. I respect his views and he seeems to think that angels did indeed cohabitate with human females. On top of that the author of the article we’re commenting on returned my email and he likewise holds that same opinion.
Ok, hold on to your seat freeper...I might be wrong. Man I hate whwn that happens. At this point I’m just going to have to say that it’s possible. It has nothing to do with ones salvation and I shouldn’t have been chopping up those that held that view anyway.