Perhaps a fruitful avenue of inquiry would be to examine the vast neo-Darwinian literature as interconnected fragments of an Epicurean creation myth. Which is to say that critics of the neo-Darwinian creation story should be reading works by Vladimir Propp and Claude Levi-Strauss if they want to create an approach that would reach a deeper understanding of evolutionary myth (or, better, "myth cycle").
You might be beyond me too then. =] It’s funny. I thought that critics of evolution were supposed to be knuckle-draggers, lower than Deadfish’s “F”ing [Don’t-Say]s. Hmmm ... I think some critics on this thread could hold their own against the smartest evolutionists on the planet.