I am aware of that. But he sounds like he believes the qorban can and must be brought now, without a Temple.
I know it's very complicated, but I thought there were those who are vehemently opposed to bringing the qorban prior to Mashiach and the Temple.
Why was the Mishkan good enough for 400 years but now we must have stone? It is time for Hashem to erect a Tabernacle on Har Habayit!
Ah. I get it. I was not sure if that was his suggestion.-
Jewish law is quite clear on the matter. Until Moshiach comes and the temple is rebuilt, there are no Korbans at all. The laws of this in the Talmud are extensive as to the service in the Temple. It sounds more like a political speech on his part at the intransigence of his fellow Jews to make it happen.
It must be very, very complicated because the faithful offered up the first Passover without either. I pray for peace and abundant blessings in and on the City of Jerusalem. Whichever side of the lamp you sit on, the light shone first in its streets and in the hearts of its people. Shalom and Happy Passover. There isn't an Easter that passes that I don't think of you on Thursday, Friday, Saturday and Sunday.
The korban pesach is the only sacrifice that can be brought without the Temple. Evidence from Byzantine records indicate that it was brought, at least irregularly, up until the 6th century. There is no Halachic impediment to bringing it today.