Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Has Noah's Ark Been Found on Turkish Mountaintop?
Fox News ^ | April 27, 2010

Posted on 04/28/2010 4:56:07 AM PDT by urroner

A group of Chinese and Turkish evangelical explorers say wooden remains they have discovered on Mount Ararat in eastern Turkey are the remains of Noah's Ark.

The group claims that carbon dating proves the relics are 4,800 years old, meaning they date to around the same time the ark was said to be afloat. Mt. Ararat has long been suspected as the final resting place of the craft by evangelicals and literalists hoping to validate biblical stories.

Yeung Wing-Cheung, from the Noah's Ark Ministries International research team that made the discovery, said: "It's not 100 percent that it is Noah's Ark, but we think it is 99.9 percent that this is it."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Apologetics; Religion & Science
KEYWORDS: catastrophism; flood; godsgravesglyphs; noah; noahsark; science; yesterday
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-53 next last
I'm wondering why they are so eagerly pointing out that carbon dating, a very scientific process, points out the age of the ark, yet they don't say word one about the complete lack of any scientific evidence of a worldwide flood 4,800 years ago.
1 posted on 04/28/2010 4:56:08 AM PDT by urroner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: urroner
I'm wondering why they are so eagerly pointing out that carbon dating, a very scientific process, points out the age of the ark, yet they don't say word one about the complete lack of any scientific evidence of a worldwide flood 4,800 years ago.

You haters are always letting the facts get in the way of a good story, I'll bet you voted against Obozo too! /Sarc

2 posted on 04/28/2010 5:02:00 AM PDT by verga (I am not an apologist, I just play one on Television)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: urroner

Search is your FRiend.


3 posted on 04/28/2010 5:02:42 AM PDT by WakeUpAndVote (Drill baby, drill!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: urroner

“...the complete lack of any scientific evidence of a worldwide flood 4,800 years ago.”

There’s plenty of evidence. Use Google.


4 posted on 04/28/2010 5:10:07 AM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: verga

“complete lack of any scientific evidence of a worldwide flood 4,800 years ago.”

A false statement.


5 posted on 04/28/2010 5:13:21 AM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: urroner
...Compelling evidence that there was a Great Flood, as told in the Old Testament story of Noah's Ark, has been found far below the waters of the Black Sea by an American expedition..
6 posted on 04/28/2010 5:14:47 AM PDT by Vaquero (BHO....'The Pretenda from Kenya')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: urroner

As Ken Ham says, “If there really was a world wide flood, what would the evidence be? Billions of dead things, buried in rock layers laid down by water all over the earth. And what do we see? Billions of dead things, buried in rock layers laid down by water all over the earth.”


7 posted on 04/28/2010 5:15:46 AM PDT by Spudx7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Yay! ANOTHER thread on Noah’s Ark!

Simmer down, people...and search first.


8 posted on 04/28/2010 5:17:46 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spudx7

well if it were only a few thousand years ago, I’m not sure there would be rocks formed from it.


9 posted on 04/28/2010 5:20:57 AM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Spudx7

>>> And what do we see? Billions of dead things, buried in rock layers laid down by water all over the earth.”

But not from a single flood occurring simultaneously everywhere on Earth that ends all life except one boatload in the Middle East, during the timeframe between the end of the last ice age and the bronze age. And that would be difficult to miss.


10 posted on 04/28/2010 5:24:18 AM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: urroner
You have me wondering why you would post this when you seem to be a doubter in the Great Flood. I'm not one to squabble about how many years back it was, but their is plenty of fossilized sea life on the slopes of mountains to say there was.
11 posted on 04/28/2010 5:25:54 AM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: urroner
What? THIS is news?????? Old story. It's been stuck in the glaciers forever and this isn't the first carbon dating, either. It's gopherwood, etc., just like the story.

As for no evidence, well, every indigenous culture out there has in it's artwork the story of a flood. Not scientific, but it's there. I thought the fossil record in the middle east has been studied and there was signs of flooding. Maybe it was wishful thinking on the Discovery Channel or something.

12 posted on 04/28/2010 5:37:41 AM PDT by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpAndVote; urroner; Constitution Day
"Search is your FRiend."

The poster has a responsibility to do a TITLE search. He does not have to see if the subject has been covered under other titles. This headline title did not have a previous occurrence.

13 posted on 04/28/2010 5:39:42 AM PDT by Artemis Webb (DeMint 2012----Remember May 20th is "Everybody Draw Mohammed Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb

If you say so!


14 posted on 04/28/2010 5:40:31 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: urroner
Actually I've got it in my shed. I've been waiting for just the right time to put it on EBAY. lol
15 posted on 04/28/2010 5:44:18 AM PDT by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: urroner
Liberal TV shows such as Nova, Discovery and History Channel have had shows on a world flood, Noah's Ark and lots of historic discoveries. You can probably find episodes on HULU and other on line sites.
16 posted on 04/28/2010 5:49:44 AM PDT by mountainlion (concerned conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: urroner

I’m wondering why they are so eagerly pointing out that carbon dating, a very scientific process, points out the age of the ark, yet they don’t say word one about the complete lack of any scientific evidence of a worldwide flood 4,800 years ago.


Why would they have to say any thing about evidence of a flood, when the evidence is every where you look, like shells on the desert floor. the flood may not have covered the whole earth but as far as Noah was concerned it did, it covered his world.


17 posted on 04/28/2010 6:09:34 AM PDT by ravenwolf (Just a bit of the long list of proofs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

There was certainly a flood which created the Black Sea, but it was more like 8,000 years ago. I believe the Black Sea flood is what inspired the Noah story. It would have wiped out most if not all of the population in the region at the time. There is also evidence of civilization on the floor of the Black Sea. Perhaps that is from where the Israelites originated and only a few survived. Passed down orally for generations and altered a bit with each, we get Noah’s story. Who knows what really happened, but it only took about 300 years for King Arthur to go from a brutal warlord to the romantic character with Camalot, a round table and knights in shining armor. There is likely truth to Noah’s story, but I doubt a man named Noah built a large ship and saved every species on earth. Not when there were humans and animals living across the world in different civilizations at the time.


18 posted on 04/28/2010 6:26:28 AM PDT by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona

Every indigenous culture also has in it artwork of the dragon. Begs the question...


19 posted on 04/28/2010 6:36:17 AM PDT by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: urroner

Genesis 8:4 (King James Version)

4And the ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat.

The Hily Bible(KJV) does NOT say that the Ark rested on THE Mr Ararat, it says that it rested on the MOUNTAINS of Ararat.


20 posted on 04/28/2010 6:50:51 AM PDT by US Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolfman23601
but I doubt a man named Noah built a large ship and saved every species on earth

probably Gilgamesh...and he just had a few chickens and goats....

21 posted on 04/28/2010 7:55:14 AM PDT by Vaquero (BHO....'The Pretenda from Kenya')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus; urroner

>>There’s plenty of evidence. Use Google.<<

Yeah, I was as perplexed by Urroner’s response as you were.


22 posted on 04/28/2010 7:57:07 AM PDT by RobRoy (The US Today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion

Further, I believe that all (yes, I said “all”) significant cultures have stories of an ancient great flood in their history.


23 posted on 04/28/2010 7:59:31 AM PDT by RobRoy (The US Today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wolfman23601

Behemoth?


24 posted on 04/28/2010 8:00:28 AM PDT by RobRoy (The US Today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy; ravenwolf; mountainlion; Desdemona; NavyCanDo; Vaquero; PetroniusMaximus

The article states that the “discoverers” of the ark clearly stated that science shows the ark is only 4,800 years old, but all the shells on the mountain sides are dated to over several million years old by science.

Also, to those who use the fossilized shells on the top of mountains, have you ever heard of plate tectonics movements and how this process creates mountains from land that use to be sea level. This same process is used to create the Dead Sea.

If people want to use science to bolster up their beliefs, then they need to be prepared for science to unbolster their claims.

Those who use shells on mountains as evidence of a global flood either must not understand plate tectonics or they shouldn’t use science to help their beliefs.

Nothing perplexing about that.


25 posted on 04/28/2010 8:43:01 AM PDT by urroner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

traderrob, don’t just say that it’s a false statement, show us evidence that it is just a false statement, unless of course, you are stating that your statement is a false statement, then it just turns into a circular argument.

The below statement is true.
The above statement is false.

What evidence is that that 4,800 years ago, there was a global flood?


26 posted on 04/28/2010 8:48:00 AM PDT by urroner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: urroner

>>...but all the shells on the mountain sides are dated to over several million years old by science.<<

Who is this “Science” guy you keep referring to and why didn’t you capitalize his name?

How did this Science guy determine the age of the “ark” and the shells? Did he use the same method and is it trustworthy?


27 posted on 04/28/2010 9:23:07 AM PDT by RobRoy (The US Today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: urroner
The shells on the mountain have nothing to do with the dating of the find. The wood was dated by Carbon dating. This is the first public story dealing with the find. We need more research as to the find. There is a 2000 year history with something on the mountain. It will be interesting to read a book on all the data.
28 posted on 04/28/2010 10:02:19 AM PDT by mountainlion (concerned conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: urroner

They dig up a jawbone out of some trashpile in Spain and declare it an 11,000,000 year old never-before known primate. Science gladly accepts the primate evidence as fact and start drawing pictures of what the primate looked like in text books. But someone produces a big wooden structure built with ancient boat building techniques on the side of a mountain at 13,000 feet and Science and non-Christians won’t even give that a passing glance.


29 posted on 04/28/2010 12:16:21 PM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day

It’s only fitting. There are, after all, more than one arcs. Several have been found this past decade alone. One of the little known facts of the Bible is that Noah actually built a fleet of arcs. Mount Ararat is lousy with arcs. You can hardly throw stone and not hit one.


30 posted on 04/28/2010 12:22:22 PM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Johnny Rico picked the wrong girl!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost

LOL!!


31 posted on 04/28/2010 12:51:14 PM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: urroner

It’s not a boat! It’s an ancient outhouse I tell you! An ancient outhouse!! /Lefty meltdown


32 posted on 04/28/2010 1:31:02 PM PDT by Catholic Canadian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo

How do you know that science “glady accepts the primate evidence?” Most new finds and discoveries in science which tend to challenge the current theories are usually greeted with a lot of skepticism and are challenged with a lot of enthusiasm.

Why is it that when science agrees with the Christians who take a dim view of science, those same Christians are more than happy to use it to prove their POV, yet, when science challenges those Christians’ POV, science is now a tool of Satan, seeking to thwart the work of God?


33 posted on 04/28/2010 2:09:04 PM PDT by urroner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: urroner

The article states that the “discoverers” of the ark clearly stated that science shows the ark is only 4,800 years old, but all the shells on the mountain sides are dated to over several million years old by science.

Also, to those who use the fossilized shells on the top of mountains, have you ever heard of plate tectonics movements and how this process creates mountains from land that use to be sea level. This same process is used to create the Dead Sea.

If people want to use science to bolster up their beliefs, then they need to be prepared for science to unbolster their claims.

Those who use shells on mountains as evidence of a global flood either must not understand plate tectonics or they shouldn’t use science to help their beliefs.


I agree at least to a point, however my faith is in Gods word and brought to me through the king James bible, thats my belief and if it says Noah built an ark then he built an ark.

My faith is not 100% blind, as there is a lot of things to look at,but if it was, that would be good enough.

And you are right, i know nothing about science, but science trys to make me believe that oil comes from dead historic animals when there are obvious explanations
that would make a lot more sense which i will not go into.

Just that one thing is enough to make me distrust science,

but that does not mean that i disagree with them on every thing, it depends on if it seems logical or not to me.

P.S
I do not see how it would make any difference how old the shells are, maybe they were already millions of years old when the flood came.


34 posted on 04/28/2010 4:00:59 PM PDT by ravenwolf (Just a bit of the long list of proofs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf

Way too often, when people (P1) from one culture think about people (P2) from a different culture, P1 try to force the thoughts and ideas of P2 out of the proper context, P2’s culture, and for it into their own, P1’s, culture. Often that is because P1 don’t have a way of studying or even understanding P2’s culture. I fear that we in the world today don’t truly understand the text of the Bible because we don’t understand the context that it was written in.

For example, Isaiah is full of word play that is easily seen by those who can read ancient Hebrew, but those of us who don’t speak it miss it completely and the true sense of the scripture slides right past us and we are totally unaware of it. It’s not our fault, but we still miss the true meaning of those scriptures. But it’s not that we not only miss the true meanings of the words, we take those words and try to understand what they mean by means of words and a culture that are completely foreign to the original language and the original culture.


35 posted on 04/28/2010 4:51:11 PM PDT by urroner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe ·

 
Gods
Graves
Glyphs
Just adding to the catalog, not sending a general distribution.
 
Catastrophism
 
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe ·
 
To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
 

·Dogpile · Archaeologica · LiveScience · Archaeology · Biblical Archaeology Society ·
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google ·
· The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·


36 posted on 04/28/2010 5:44:36 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

http://www.foxnews.com/static/managed/img/Scitech/Noah%27s%20Ark_doomsday_604x341.jpg


37 posted on 04/28/2010 5:50:06 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus
Actually no. There's none.

If all of the polar ice caps melted, the sea level would rise a few feet. There's not enough water to flood the earth to the elevation of Mt. Ararat. It's simple math.

38 posted on 04/28/2010 6:27:19 PM PDT by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Two questions come to mind: one, where was the RC testing done (and BTW, as a disclaimer, I don’t believe any RC testing WAS done), and two, well, everyone should be able to figure it out for themselves.


39 posted on 04/28/2010 7:42:47 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf

I agree at least to a point, however my faith is in Gods word and brought to me through the king James bible, thats my belief and if it says Noah built an ark then he built an ark

KJV of the bible.....why don’t you read the rest of it and find out what your protestant brethren didn’t want you to know......for 1,500 years it worked fine


40 posted on 04/28/2010 8:33:48 PM PDT by terycarl (4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: terycarl

KJV of the bible.....why don’t you read the rest of it and find out what your protestant brethren didn’t want you to know......for 1,500 years it worked fine


Why don,t you just tell me the big secret that you have of the K.J V. of the Bible and I will look at it and see if you are right or not?


41 posted on 04/29/2010 6:33:56 PM PDT by ravenwolf (Just a bit of the long list of proofs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: urroner

For example, Isaiah is full of word play that is easily seen by those who can read ancient Hebrew, but those of us who don’t speak it miss it completely and the true sense of the scripture slides right past us and we are totally unaware of it. It’s not our fault, but we still miss the true meaning of those scriptures. But it’s not that we not only miss the true meanings of the words, we take those words and try to understand what they mean by means of words and a culture that are completely foreign to the original language and the original culture.


I have believed the same thing for years, I am not trying to get any one to believe the Bible my way or any way at all, as it is no matter to me.

I just stated to the unbeliever of the ark story that if God said Noah built an ark, then Noah built an ark.

What some body else believes is their business.


42 posted on 04/29/2010 6:43:11 PM PDT by ravenwolf (Just a bit of the long list of proofs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner

Totally agree....I can understand the emotions of biblical tales, but I can better understand basic reality.


43 posted on 04/29/2010 6:45:23 PM PDT by ErnBatavia (It's not the Obama Administration....it's the "Obama Regime".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: urroner

“Why is it that when science agrees with the Christians who take a dim view of science, those same Christians are more than happy to use it to prove their POV, yet, when science challenges those Christians’ POV, science is now a tool of Satan, seeking to thwart the work of God?”

Why is it that people so often try to pit science against Christianity? Many of those scientists ARE CHRISTIANS and what they observe confirms their Biblical beliefs.


44 posted on 04/30/2010 4:47:49 AM PDT by Diapason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: urroner
We viewed the video and my wife, the E.R. Nurse noticed the floor boards they showed were perfectly cut (Straight Lines). This is what happens when a metal saw, and not an Axe is used. Noah's ark was supposedly built by Noah and his sons, so where did they get the circular saw or the steel blades to cut the wood like this?

I wish this was it, but will need a lot more proof.

45 posted on 04/30/2010 5:04:47 AM PDT by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf

Why don,t you just tell me the big secret that you have of the K.J V. of the Bible and I will look at it and see if you are right or not?

there is no secrets the KJV....it is whAT THEY ELIMINATED THAT IS THE SECRET.....CHECK WITH YOUR (sorry I hit the caps key) Minister ......you wiull find that for 1,500 years the bible taught what was right.....in the 1500’s the protestants decided to change the bible......what’s with that???????


46 posted on 04/30/2010 5:05:03 PM PDT by terycarl (4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: All

Noah’s Ark PaleoBabble Update

http://michaelsheiser.com/PaleoBabble/

I was the archaeologist with the Chinese expedition in the summer of 2008 and was given photos of what they now are reporting to be the inside of the Ark. I and my partners invested $100,000 in this expedition (described below) which they have retained, despite their promise and our requests to return it, since it was not used for the expedition. The information given below is my opinion based on what I have seen and heard (from others who claim to have been eyewitnesses or know the exact details).

To make a long story short: this is all reported to be a fake. The photos were reputed to have been taken off site near the Black Sea, but the film footage the Chinese now have was shot on location on Mt. Ararat. In the late summer of 2008 ten Kurdish workers hired by Parasut, the guide used by the Chinese, are said to have planted large wood beams taken from an old structure in the Black Sea area (where the photos were originally taken) at the Mt. Ararat site. In the winter of 2008 a Chinese climber taken by Parasut’s men to the site saw the wood, but couldn’t get inside because of the severe weather conditions. During the summer of 2009 more wood was planted inside a cave at the site. The Chinese team went in the late summer of 2009 (I was there at the time and knew about the hoax) and was shown the cave with the wood and made their film. As I said, I have the photos of the inside of the so-called Ark (that show cobwebs in the corners of rafters – something just not possible in these conditions) and our Kurdish partner in Dogubabyazit (the village at the foot of Mt. Ararat) has all of the facts about the location, the men who planted the wood, and even the truck that transported it


47 posted on 05/01/2010 8:14:01 AM PDT by Pride_of_the_Bluegrass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: terycarl

there is no secrets the KJV....it is whAT THEY ELIMINATED THAT IS THE SECRET.....CHECK WITH YOUR (sorry I hit the caps key) Minister ......you wiull find that for 1,500 years the bible taught what was right.....in the 1500’s the protestants decided to change the bible......what’s with that???????


Sorry, but i think its the other way around, i believe the roman church kept the scriptures a secret from the majority of the people and every thing was just hear say.

A small percentage of the people knew what the scriptures said
but they did not want the people to know what they said because they wanted to keep the people in the dark and keep the rule over them, no different from the priests and their underlings that killed the son of God.

Some of the people you refer to as protestants were actually members of the Church of Rome, and they knew what the scriptures said, and knew that the church was hiding any thing that might take some of their power away.

John 8; 32
And you shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free.

During the time of the power of the Roman Church the people was not even free to read the scriptures for them selves.

The difference between the K.J.V and some of the other popular versions are that the other ones are translated by religious organizations who translate to fit their own agenda, the K.J.V. was not.


48 posted on 05/01/2010 11:36:39 AM PDT by ravenwolf (Just a bit of the long list of proofs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf

Sorry, but i think its the other way around, i believe the roman church kept the scriptures a secret from the majority of the people and every thing was just hear say.

in the 1500 years before the invention of the printiung press, bibles were hand written by Catholic monks and therefore very expensive. The church was not keeping bibles from anyone. First of all, very few people could read and if they could, they could only read their language. The Catholics did not interpret the bible to suit their needs, they wrote it and it was in the 1500’s that the protestant revolters decided to eliminate entire books which had been there from the beginning.


49 posted on 05/01/2010 3:57:21 PM PDT by terycarl (4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: urroner

I found out my sister knows one of the scientist who discovered the structure, and that the structure being shown has been found some time ago, but it’s just now hitting the news. She also said the what is being shown in the media is just part of what they found, and that the ship is in two seperate sections as if broken in half.

My sister rights:

“This has been discovered before by my friend Dr. Ron Charles. You are seeing just a portion of it in the media. I have heard the personal stories on the discovery directly from him. Very interesting. The discovery was done by Dr. Ron Charles and his exuviating crew. I have a lot of info that I can get. He will be here in June for a few days you are welcome to come and talk with him. He will be at our church he is personal friends with my pastor, I have also had him overnight with his wife here. I have a great book from Dr Ron Charles you should read of all the discoveries he has made.
I have his wife on face book but he has to play it low key because of other things he is involved that is dangerous to be public knowledge.”


50 posted on 05/02/2010 12:07:42 AM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson