Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Cost of Contraception: Women's Health - Response to CNN
LifeSiteNews.com ^ | June 10, 2010 | Jenn Giroux

Posted on 06/14/2010 9:44:05 AM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM

Thursday June 10, 2010



The Cost of Contraception: Women's Health - Response to CNN


LSNTODAY'S HEADLINES   |   SEND NEWS TIPS   |   DONATE

SHARE: E-mail E-MAIL  Print PRINT     

By Jenn Giroux



FRONT ROYAL, Virginia, June 10, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) - As a Registered Nurse and mother of 9 I am stunned at the mis-information found in Adam Sonfield's CNN article entitled:  "What if Contraception were always covered?"

Sonfield claims that there is overwhelming medical, social and economic benefit to contraception access.  The complete opposite is true.

Undeniable medical evidence confirms that use of the pill increases a woman's risk and incident for Breast, Cervical, and Liver Cancer.  Prior to the pill and the widespread use of contraception there were known to be 5 sexually transmitted diseases. Today there are more than 30. Will treatment be free for these 50+ million US men and women who are reported to have incurable genital herpes (Source - Sexual Transmitted Disease Surveillance and Statistics, The US Center for Disease Control and Prevention)? And what about the health of unsuspecting young girls who now use hormonal contraceptives for a minimum of 4 years prior to their first full term pregnancy?  Is it also a "health benefit" that according to the Guttmacher Institute they will have a 52% higher risk of developing breast cancer (Mayo Clinic Proceedings)? I think not. 

On the social end, it is clear from the admitted behavior of those who receive early access to contraception that they have sex sooner.  Had Mr. Sonfield not cited only selected research from his employer, he would have disclosed that Guttmacher's own research confirms that 60% of women have abortions because of failed contraception. Therefore, always and without exception, increased contraception means increased abortions.  Contraception is abortion's feeder system - and Gutmacher, Planned Parenthood, and Obama know that.

And how ironic is it to mention the 'Healthy People 2010' goals as a reason for pushing contraception (many methods of which are known abortifacients)?  Socially, a recent report by researchers at the Wharton School of Business confirms that mothers are more unhappy today than ever before. It states: "If the pill made motherhood 'better,' then one would expect that mothers would be happier now than they were in 1972, before the birth rate fell dramatically as contraception use expanded. Instead, as, between 1972 and 2006, the happiness of U.S. mothers fell just as dramatically."  This helps identify the widespread 'post contraceptive regret' that is felt in the hearts of women across America who mourn the children that God intended for them yet they knowingly prevented or aborted.

With 50+ million surgical abortions, an estimated 250 million chemical abortions from hormonal contraceptives, and nearly 20 million individual new cases of STD's reported in US every year, it is time for the advocates of Planned Parenthood's own research arm, Guttmucher Institute, to be held accountable to taxpayers for the straight facts.

Women and young girls should not be misled into a lifestyle of contraception that carries more medical costs and emotional pain than the benefits its purports to bestow. It is time that the focus once again be placed on America's greatest resource: children. 

Dare Mr. Sonfield argue with that? 

Jenn Giroux is a Registered Nurse and the new Executive Director of HLI America, a new program of Human Life International founded to educate on the physical, emotional, and spiritual harms of contraception and to highlight the beauty of having children.  She and her husband, Dan, have nine children and live in Cincinnati. See http://www.hliamerica.org/ for more information.


TOPICS: Catholic; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: contraception

1 posted on 06/14/2010 9:44:05 AM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp

Not all contraception is chemically based.


2 posted on 06/14/2010 9:59:28 AM PDT by Grunthor (Getting married, T minus 12 days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor
You're right. But those that are not chemically based are notoriously ineffective. There is a better option for those who desire a Godly alternative.
3 posted on 06/14/2010 10:02:04 AM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp

I wonder is the condom is less effective.


4 posted on 06/14/2010 10:05:29 AM PDT by Grunthor (Getting married, T minus 12 days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor
Not all contraception is chemically based. Correct, but any form of contraception devalues the human body mentally and physically.
5 posted on 06/14/2010 10:06:19 AM PDT by Angry_White_Man_Syndrome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Angry_White_Man_Syndrome

“Correct, but any form of contraception devalues the human body mentally and physically.”

What does having more children than you can hope to support do to the human body?


6 posted on 06/14/2010 10:08:45 AM PDT by Grunthor (Getting married, T minus 12 days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp

Good article and 100% correct.


7 posted on 06/14/2010 10:16:28 AM PDT by Antoninus (It's a degenerate society where dogs have more legal rights than unborn babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor
What does having more children than you can hope to support do to the human body?

Considering we live in the richest society in the history of the human race, this argument is patently absurd.
8 posted on 06/14/2010 10:18:09 AM PDT by Antoninus (It's a degenerate society where dogs have more legal rights than unborn babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp

Bookmark.


9 posted on 06/14/2010 10:19:47 AM PDT by Sergio (If a tree fell on a mime in the forest, would he make a sound?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

Condoms have a 10 to 15% failure rate in preventing pregnancy in real world usage. (And if it fails 10% of the time in preventing pregnancy, and a woman can only get pregnant approx 7 days a month, but can get AIDS 31 days a month, the failure rate of condoms in preventing AIDS is that much higher, which is why it is malfeasance at best to recommend condoms to prevent AIDS.)


10 posted on 06/14/2010 10:40:18 AM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus; Grunthor
Considering we live in the richest society in the history of the human race, this argument is patently absurd.

Amen.

All those >7000sq ft McMansions, with average US fertility of less than 1.5.

God is not amused.

11 posted on 06/14/2010 10:42:34 AM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp

Excellent point.


12 posted on 06/14/2010 10:44:13 AM PDT by Spudx7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor
From WikiPedia:

The typical use pregnancy rate among condom users varies depending on the population being studied, ranging from 10–18% per year.

So I was wrong. Failure rates average 10–18%, not 10-15%.

13 posted on 06/14/2010 10:46:10 AM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp

ok, good info, thank you.


14 posted on 06/14/2010 11:13:09 AM PDT by Grunthor (Getting married, T minus 12 days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp

“God is not amused”

I’m going out on a pretty thick limb when I express my doubt in your ability to know this.


15 posted on 06/14/2010 11:14:13 AM PDT by Grunthor (Getting married, T minus 12 days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp

You expressed in your earlier post a concern of women getting AIDs through condom use. I was stuck in a mentality of sex in marriage between two monogomous people.

AIDs would not be an issue, would it?


16 posted on 06/14/2010 11:16:19 AM PDT by Grunthor (Getting married, T minus 12 days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor
It is a separate issue. I was making an aside. Many commentators condemn the Church for not recommending condom use to "prevent" AIDS.

But the Church is not in the business of promoting suicide. And recommending condoms to prevent a deadly disease is just that.

Sorry I did not make myself more clear.

17 posted on 06/14/2010 12:10:15 PM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor
Spending hundreds of thousands of dollars for multi-room McMansions, for "families" with no kids or only 1.1 kids, would be amusing to God, in your opinion?

Especially when those very couples are engaging in behavior deemed by the entire witness of Christianity (until the 20th century) to be sinful (ie, contraception, abortion, & sterilization) in order to prevent the birth of the very children that should be filling those McMansions?

I don't think so.

God is not amused.

18 posted on 06/14/2010 12:14:47 PM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp

“Spending hundreds of thousands of dollars for multi-room McMansions, for “families” with no kids or only 1.1 kids, would be amusing to God, in your opinion?”

Oh, I am not so proud that I believe that I can know the mind of God.


19 posted on 06/14/2010 12:16:51 PM PDT by Grunthor (Getting married, T minus 12 days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor
Its not a matter of pride. I know the mind of God on this quite well, because He shared it with me:

"God blessed them; and God said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it; and rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over every living thing that moves on the earth."

And He has not rescinded this, the first commandment of Scripture.

20 posted on 06/14/2010 12:57:27 PM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp

“God blessed them; and God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it; and rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over every living thing that moves on the earth.”


You do not believe that this has been accomplished?


21 posted on 06/14/2010 1:05:12 PM PDT by Grunthor (Getting married, T minus 12 days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor
No...Unless you can show me in scripture where it has been rescinded.

That is the best "proof text" for the fallacy of the concept of overpopulation. There is no rescinding of Genesis 1:28. Anyone who claims "there are too many people" is clearly out of line with Scripture. If such were possible, God would have told us.

The myth of overpopulation is a demonic deception.

The devil hates mankind, because every child conceived can go to heaven, where the devil can never again tread. It was the concept of man - the combination of an eternal soul and a physical body - with free will, that lead to satan's rebellion in the first place.

Every soul the devil prevents from being conceived is a little demonic victory against God, IMHO.

22 posted on 06/14/2010 1:42:27 PM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp

THe population of the earth is approaching 6 and a half billion last I checked. How much is enough?


23 posted on 06/14/2010 1:47:32 PM PDT by Grunthor (Getting married, T minus 12 days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp; Grunthor
The Apostle Paul leaves a good deal of day-to-day life to the conscience of the person. Since God never put a number on “be fruitful and multiply,” shouldn't a person's conscience, steered by seeking God, be a guide? And if a couple together chooses that zero, one, two, or 15 kids is enough, isn't that the business of the couple?
24 posted on 06/14/2010 2:05:36 PM PDT by JoeDonnellymakesmepuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor; Dr. Brian Kopp
There are questions and answers within one of these links that answers your querry about population.

The Cost of Contraception: Women's Health - Response to CNN
The Connection between Contraception and Abortion
Baby Bust: The Demographics of Global Depression

The Surest Sign of a Decadent Culture
Protestants and Birth Control
The Protest of a Protestant Minister Against Birth Control
Contraception: Why Not?
The Bible & Birth Control
Our Gravest Moral Responsibility: Convert the Contraception Mentality
Contraception and Conversion
Evangelical Leaders are Ok with Contraception
The pill and 50 years of misery [the pill kills!]
The dawn of demonic deception [the birth control pill]

Researcher finds strong link between contraception and HIV
The Birth-Control Riddle
Social Science Proves Humanae Vitae
"Contraception Is Wrong. Now Here's How You Use It . . ."
Suit claims birth control warning not enough
Natural and Unnatural (father of 5 shocks mother of 1)
Planned Parenthood Uses Teens to Distribute Injectable Birth Control in Rural Ecuador
Study: Low-Dose Birth Control Pills Decrease Bone Density in Young Women
Spanish drug agency confirms grave effects of morning-after pill
Another Woman Dies of Hormonal Contraceptive in Switzerland

Study Finds Half of Women on "Birth Control Shot" Suffer Bone Problems
The Re-Birth of Population Control: Human Life Seen as a Carbon Problem
Radio Replies First Volume - Birth Control
Abortion, birth control pill linked to breast cancer, surgeon says
God before contraception (Australia)
Fighting the 'contraceptive mentality'
Birth control pill creator regrets population decline
Polluted Water, Polluted Culture (one more consequence from contraception)
Abortifacients -- The Other Forbidden Grief
NFP and Contraception: What’s the Difference?

Wisconsin requiring Catholic institutions to provide contraceptives coverage
Contraception: The history you may have missed and would rather not know
Why does Pope Benedict talk about Humanae vitae in the new encyclical? [Catholic Caucus]
New Evangelical Documentary Exposes Abortifacient Qualities of the Birth Control Pill, Promotes NFP
In Quiverfull Movement, Birth Control Is Shunned
Press in a Dither Again over Pope’s Reaffirmation of Catholic Teaching
How Birth Control Changed America for the Worst
If You Are Contracepting, You Are Part of A Very Big Problem
Vatican and Italian government criticize sale of RU 486 in Italy
New Condom Ads Target Catholics, Latinos

St. Padre Pio, Humanae Vitae, and Mandatory Abortion
Responsible Parenthood in a Birth Control Culture, Part Two [Open]
Responsible Parenthood in a Birth Control Culture, Part One [Open]
Humanae Vitae and True Sexual Freedom — Part 6 of 6 [Open]
Contraception v. Natural Family Planning — Part 5 of 6 [Open]
Sex Speaks: True and False Prophets — Part 4 of 6 [Open]
Contraception and the Language of the Body — Part 3 of 6 [Open]
Does Contraception Foster Love? — Part 2 of 6 [Open]
Contraception and Cultural Chaos — Part 1 of 6 [Open]
Priests still suffering from effects of Humanae Vitae dissenters, Vatican cardinal says (Must read!)

"Provoking reflection" (Contrasting views on Humanae Vitae)
Humanae Vitae The Year of the Peirasmòs - 1968
Catholics to Pope: Lift the Birth Control Ban
[OPEN] The Vindication of Humanae Vitae
Catholic Clergy Challenge Colleagues to Reacquaint Themselves and Their People with Humanae Vitae
White House proposes wide "conscience clause" on abortion, contraception
THE EX CATHEDRA STATUS OF THE ENCYCLICAL "HUMANAE VITAE" [Catholic Caucus]
“A degrading poison that withers life”
Australia Study: 70 Percent of Women Seeking Abortions Used Contraception
[Fr. Thomas Euteneuer] In Persona Christi: The Priest and Contraception

A Challenging Truth, Part Two: The Day the Birth Control Died
A Challenging Truth, Part One: How Birth Control Works
Ten Challenges for the Pro-Life Movement in 2008
The concept of the "intrinsically evil"
Pope Tells Pharmacists Not to Dispense Drugs With 'Immoral Purposes'
Massive Study Finds the Pill Significantly Increases Cancer Risk if Used more than Eight Years
Birth Control Pill Creates Blood Clot Causing Death of Irish Woman
Seminarians Bring Church’s Teaching on Contraception, Sexuality to YouTube
Abortion and Contraception: Old Lies
History of Catholic teaching on Contraception

Pope: Legislation "Supporting Contraception and Abortion is Threatening the Future of Peoples"
Contraception: Why It's Wrong
On Fox News Fearless HLI Priest Takes on Sean Hannity (may be indebted for saving his soul)
VIDEO - SEAN HANNITY vs REV. THOMAS EUTENEUER (must see!)
The Early Church Fathers on Contraception - Catholic/Orthodox Caucus
Pope on divine love vs. erotic love
Conjugal Love and Procreation: God's Design
Being fruitful [Evangelicals and contraception]

25 posted on 06/14/2010 2:05:56 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor
Ask God, not me.

The biggest economic crisis facing mankind is an overabundance of production capacity, resources and goods and a falling fertility rate.

There's no scarcity anywhere -- except that which has been caused by regional or global government corruption, greed, malfeasance and evil. We don't have too many people, we have too many bureaucrats.

One last thought:

Poverty is when you have too many people for the resources of a given geographic area. When we see people living in poverty, we have a Christian duty to assist them. Scripture is crystal clear on this point.

But what happens when, by verbal engineering, you give poverty a new name?

By calling it overpopulation, you remove from yourself any obligation to assist them that scripture demands. You can then tell those living in poverty, "Its your own fault! If you'd just stop having babies, you wouldn't be living in a state of overpopulation." Then we can assuage our guilty conscience by sending them condoms and Norplant and suction vacuum abortion kits, instead of corn and educational and infrastructure assistance, and feel morally superior for our worldly wisdom and helping stop global warming.

Scripture talks about that too:

34"Then the King will say to those on his right, 'Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. 35For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, 36I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.' 37"Then the righteous will answer him, 'Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? 38When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? 39When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?' 40"The King will reply, 'I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me.'

14What good is it, my brothers, if a man claims to have faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save him? 15 Suppose a brother or sister is without clothes and daily food. 16 If one of you says to him, "Go, I wish you well; keep warm and well fed," but does nothing about his physical needs, what good is it? 17 In the same way, faith by itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead.

26 posted on 06/14/2010 2:14:52 PM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: JoeDonnellymakesmepuke
if a couple together chooses that zero, one, two, or 15 kids is enough, isn't that the business of the couple?

Now you're getting into a Natural Law debate, which is beyond the scope of this thread.

Suffice it to say that according to Natural Law theory, we have a moral obligation as Christians, in the eyes of God, to contribute to the propagation of the species. Furthermore, the primary ends of marriage, as instituted by God, are the bearing and education of children.

If Christian couples refuse to have children, they better have a damn good reason for doing so when they come before the Judgment Seat of God.

27 posted on 06/14/2010 2:24:32 PM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: JoeDonnellymakesmepuke
Since God never put a number on “be fruitful and multiply,” shouldn't a person's conscience, steered by seeking God, be a guide?

Since a fertility rate of 2.1 is required just to maintain a stable population and keep it from crashing, and no economic growth has ever occurred in the context of population contraction, a very good secular argument could be made that, for those able, three children per couple would be a bare minimum.

28 posted on 06/14/2010 2:34:14 PM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Excellent, thanks! You need to do a thread just with all the contraception/NFP/population control links.


29 posted on 06/14/2010 2:36:06 PM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp
a very good secular argument could be made that, for those able, three children per couple would be a bare minimum.

Thanks for the reply, although I wasn't asking for a secular argument; in fact, the secular argument is frightening. Would you support legislation requiring couples to produce three children?

30 posted on 06/14/2010 3:02:23 PM PDT by JoeDonnellymakesmepuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor
Who said anything about having more children? There are ways to avoid getting pregnant while still enjoying a happy sex life. Natural Family planning is a proven method. As a Catholic Husband and Father this method does work.
31 posted on 06/14/2010 3:54:12 PM PDT by Angry_White_Man_Syndrome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JoeDonnellymakesmepuke

Makes sense to me.


32 posted on 06/14/2010 4:12:09 PM PDT by Grunthor (Getting married, T minus 12 days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Angry_White_Man_Syndrome

Yeah I read a little about it today and it sounds good. I am going to study on it further before I agree that it is a more effective method than condoms or other forms of BC.


33 posted on 06/14/2010 4:15:07 PM PDT by Grunthor (Getting married, T minus 12 days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: JoeDonnellymakesmepuke

No.


34 posted on 06/14/2010 6:20:53 PM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson