Skip to comments.
Catholics angry as church puts female ordination on par with sex abuse
The Guardian ^
| John Hooper in Rome
Posted on 07/15/2010 1:19:06 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
It was meant to be the document that put a lid on the clerical sex abuse scandals that have swept the Roman Catholic world. But instead of quelling fury from within and without the church, the Vatican stoked the anger of liberal Catholics and women's groups by including a provision in its revised decree that made the "attempted ordination" of women one of the gravest crimes in ecclesiastical law.
The change put the "offence" on a par with the sex abuse of minors.
Terry Sanderson, president of the National Secular Society, called the document "one of the most insulting and misogynistic pronouncements that the Vatican has made for a very long time. Why any self-respecting woman would want to remain part of an organisation that regards their full and equal participation as a 'grave sin' is a mystery to me."
Vivienne Hayes, the chief executive of the Women's Resource Centre, said the decision to raise women's ordination to the level of a serious crime was "appalling".
She added: "This declaration is doubly disempowering for women as it also closes the door on dialogue around women's access to power and decision making, when they are still under-represented in all areas of political, religious and civic life. We would urge the Catholic church to acknowledge that women's rights are not incompatible with religious faith."
Ceri Goddard, chief executive of the Fawcett Society, said: "We are sure that the vast majority of the general public will share in our abject horror at the Vatican's decision to categorise the ordination of women as an 'offence' in the same category as paedophilia deemed to be one of the 'gravest offences a priest can commit'.
(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: catholic; female; ordination; sexabuse
Three bishops at the ordination of a female French priest in Lyons in 2005. All four women were excommunicated. From left: South African Patricia Fresen, Austrian Christine Mayr-Lumetzberger and German Gisela Forster
So why don’t they become nuns? Always trying to destroy the church, Catholic and Protestant.
posted on 07/15/2010 1:22:54 PM PDT
(<This space for lease>)
They want to be able to say Mass.
Next question is this — if a Priest is called Father, what do they call female priests?
Nuns are already mothers...
“Catholics angry” - should be CINOs angry.
posted on 07/15/2010 1:28:01 PM PDT
("A man's character is his fate" - Heraclitus)
Catholics angry - should be CINOs angry.
It should say 'witches angry'
posted on 07/15/2010 1:33:55 PM PDT
by Never on my watch
(The Obama Administration - an outrage a day)
The headline is such a crock...
Some comments on the new norms concerning Graviora Delicta
The Holy See has revised some norms concerning "exceptionally serious" crimes against faith and morals.
All the delicts will be handled by the tribunal of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Besides the Churchs three great tribunals (Segnatura, Rota, Penitentiary), Congregations also have juridical sections. The CDF has both a doctrinal section and a juridical section.
The revised norms were approved by Pope Benedict XVI on 21 May. They were distributed to all the bishops.
Among the major changes are an increase in the "statute of limitations" for certain crimes from to 20 years and also the possibility of waiving the limitation completely depending on the case. Requests can be made to the Pope to dismiss clerics from the clerical state without an canonical trial. Also, the CDF will now be able to try and judge cardinals, patriarchs, and bishops at the Popes behest.
Keep in mind that the new norms deal with crimes against morals, but also of faith. In addition to the sexual abuse of minors crimes which will probably be the sole focus of much of the press the new norms also cover heresy, apostasy, schism, not just direct but also indirect violation of the seal of Confession, recordings of a sacramental confession done with malice, the attempted ordination of a woman to Holy Orders, and the acquisition, possession or distribution of pornographic images of minors under the age of 14, a clerico turpe patrata [shamefully accomplished by a cleric], in any way and by any means.
The following graviora delicta more serious crimes are reserved to the CDF:
- throwing away, taking or retaining the consecrated species for a sacrilegious purpose, or profaning the consecrated species (Tell that to priests and others who know better when they pout the Precious Blood down sacristy sinks and sacraria!)
- attempting the liturgical action of the Eucharistic sacrifice or the simulation thereof [citing Canon 1378, this norm applies to persons who have not been ordained priests] (Read: pretending to say Mass)
- concelebrating the Eucharistic Sacrifice together with ministers of ecclesial communities which do not have Apostolic succession nor recognize the Sacramental dignity of priestly ordination (what has been called communicatio in sacris)
- The more grave delict of the attempted sacred ordination of a woman is also reserved to the
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Those who attempt to ordain and be ordained incur automatic excommunication.
- consecrating one matter without the other in a Eucharistic celebration or both outside of a Eucharistic celebration
- absolution of an accomplice in the sin against the sixth commandment of the Decalogue
- solicitation to sin with the confessor against the sixth commandment of the Decalogue, in the act of, context of or pretext of the Sacrament of Penance
- direct violation of the Sacramental seal
- the violation of the sixth commandment of the Decalogue, committed by a cleric with a minor under the age of 18.
All of these things are sins again faith and/or morals. Sometimes one, sometimes both.
One of the reasons why the norms have been so complicated in the past, and words such as "secrecy" have been used to the delight of Hells Bible which distorted the reality behind the objective of secrecy was to protect the dignity of the sacrament of penance, the internal forum, and the people involved.
Another thing you will perhaps will see in the press, secular and Catholic, are criticisms of the list of crimes. They may complain that, for example, trying to ordain a woman is not nearly as horrible as abusing a minor and it shouldnt simply be lumped in with other sins, as if they all did they same damage. In a sense, they are right, especially from the perspective of the victim of abuse. But they are wrong from another perspective. Critics might assert that pouring the Precious Blood down the sink or selling a Host or pretending to ordain a woman is a "victimless" crime, bad to be sure but really not that bad. They are wrong. There are still victims: the whole Church suffers because all the crimes involved attack who and what the Church is.
The crimes do belong together when seen in the correct perspective. All of the crimes here involve sacred things. Even the crime of abusing a minor outside the context of confession involves something sacred because it involves an ordained person, a sacred person. Abuse of the Blessed Sacrament is the worst of all, because it involves God truly sacramentally present. Simulation of Mass or Ordination or any other sacraments is an abuse of the sacred. All these crimes tear at the very heart of the Church herself and they therefore merit being called graviora or "more serious". The abuse of the young can leave hideous scars. These crimes are so serious that they demand the most serious attention and measures. They also deserve serious attention not just because of the harm done to the individual victims but because, since they involve priests (and sometimes the sacrament of penance when people are at their most vulnerable) and therefore the fabric of the Church herself.
That said, John Allen, the fair-minded and nearly ubiquitous columnist still sadly writing for the NCFishwrap, covering the presser for the release of the documents, reported that:
At a Vatican briefing this morning, Maltese Monsignor Charles Scicluna, an official at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, denied that the Vatican equates womens ordination with the sexual abuse of children. An illicit ordination, Scicluna said, is a "sacramental" crime, while abuse is a "moral" crime.
Frankly, I think that attempted ordination of women and abuse of the Blessed Sacrament, violation of the seal are all also moral crimes. But lets move along.
Since the graviora delicta are so terrible, there is now a more robust way of dealing with them. Also, modern communication methods and travel make it possible to move more swiftly. Furthermore, the lengthy process of dismissal of a priest from the clerical state had to be unsnarled. In justice, the norms had to be revised. Furthermore, measures had to be taken to protect the good name of those who were falsely accused, as has been known to happen.
In any event, there is also a long history of the development of these new norms available, which you would do well to read in order to gain some perspective about what the Holy See has done in the past and what it is doing now.
UPDATE 19:56 GMT:
I mentioned that some would freak out that womens ordination was included in the list. Note in Hells Bible
s article by Rachel Donadio:
But in a move that infuriated victims groups and put United States bishops on the defensive, it also codified the attempted ordination of women to the priesthood as one of the churchs most grave crimes, along with heresy, schism and pedophilia.
And as I have said in these electronic pages many times, for Pope Benedicts detractors and the Churchs habitual critics, nothing the Church does can ever be good enough. To wit:
Bishopaccountability.org, which tracks cases of sex abuse by priests cases worldwide, said the changes amount to administrative tinkering of a secretive internal process.
Then there is this from deservedly excommunicated Roy Bourgeois, Maryknoller and perhaps not yet ex-priest:
What I did, supporting the ordination of women, they saw as a serious crime, Father Bourgeois said. But priests who were abusing children, they did not see as a crime. What does that say?
It is patently false
that the Church didnt see the abuse of children as a crime.
Roy Bourgeois is a liar and Hells Bible doesnt correct the manifest lie because it the truth in this matter isnt the news that fits.
Thus, the journalistic integrity of Rachel Donadio, Laurie Goodstein, and her editorial overlords at Hells Bible.
Why any self-respecting woman would want to remain part of an organisation that regards their full and equal participation as a 'grave sin' is a mystery to me."
Terry Sanderson's ignorance of the birds and the bees astonishes me. I can assure you that by wife does not view my attendance at the birth of our children as full and equal participation. God created men and women different. That the Catholic Church would celebrate God's creation as it actually is drives liberals NUTS.
posted on 07/15/2010 1:42:35 PM PDT
bishops?????????? :) :) :)
posted on 07/15/2010 1:44:17 PM PDT
( Trust Rush and you won't go wrong.)
Um . . . why would any member of something called the "National Secular Society" have anything whatsoever to say about the internal rules of an organization they don't belong to and believe is mistaken anyway?
I'm curious . . . are the ancient ethnic Eastern and Oriental churches also subject to feminist wrath over no female priests?
posted on 07/15/2010 1:46:32 PM PDT
by Zionist Conspirator
(HaShem 'Eloqeykhem hirbah 'etkhem; vehinnekhem hayom kekhoshevey HaShamayim larov.)
posted on 07/15/2010 2:50:57 PM PDT
(If a tree fell on a mime in the forest, would he make a sound?)
Although I am no longer catholic, I sure would have never gone to a female for confession......
To: goat granny
Although I am no longer catholic, I sure would have never gone to a female for confession......
LOL!! We spent a good five minutes laughing about this at a coffee shop one day ... and this is an additional reason to keep women out of the priesthood. Can you imagine a woman keeping her mouth shut after hearing the sins of others? Absolutely impossible!
[woman priest to whomever] "Why did you see those horrible pink shoes she wore to confession? She's loud and brash too. I heard her husband's confession as well. No wonder he's seeking out other women."
posted on 07/15/2010 3:38:25 PM PDT
(Hail Mary, full of grace, the Lord is with thee ...)
"This declaration is doubly disempowering
for women as it also closes the door on dialogue around women's access to power and decision making,
when they are still under-represented in all areas of political, religious and civic life. We would urge the Catholic church to acknowledge that women's rights
are not incompatible with religious faith." [Emphasis mine]
Boy, this tells you where they are coming from. Basically they reject the Catholic --and Orthodox--sacerdotal priesthood and try to substitute what amounts to a Protestant notion of ministry. Out the window goes apostolic succession and the whole Tradition of the Church. In comes their radical innovations. I submit this amounts to nothing more than an attempt to destroy the Church and replace it with what amounts to social institutions dressed in ecclesiastical garb.
posted on 07/15/2010 3:40:57 PM PDT
(Pray with the suffering souls.)
LOL I expected to get flamed for that remark....glad I am not the only one that thinks that way...:O)Us females know all about females...
Your last paragraph is a hoot......
To: goat granny
I’ll bet these womyn don’t believe in “confession” or sin or hell or repentance. They likely espouse and believe that “God is loving, God isn’t judgmental, God forgives all, homosexuality isn’t a sin” blah, blah, blah.
posted on 07/16/2010 8:06:07 AM PDT
(America is being tested as never before in its history. May God help us.)
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson