Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Christian_Capitalist
Is there scriptural support for either position?
8 posted on 09/15/2010 12:06:14 PM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: ShadowAce

Romans 3:23


11 posted on 09/15/2010 12:12:58 PM PDT by stefanbatory (Insert witty tagline here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce
Is there scriptural support for either position?

There's some Scriptural support for John Calvin's position. Here's one I like off the top of my head:

Since we know that God does not consider the Reprobate to be "His Children" but rather "Children of Satan" (John 8:44), for God to claim these murdered infants as HIS Children is supportive of Calvin's belief that God has chosen to monergistically Regenerate and Save, including them amongst His Elect, those whom He has permitted to die in Infancy.

There's no Scriptural support at all for the wicked Arminian/Wesleyan doctrine of Infant Damnation; but then again, there's no Scriptural support for any of the Arminians' teachings. This is just one particularly detestable example of their many execrable blasphemies.

13 posted on 09/15/2010 12:15:57 PM PDT by Christian_Capitalist (Taxation over 10% is Tyranny -- 1 Samuel 8:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson