[allmendream]

Not avoiding it at all, I thought the answer was obvious.

If Roe v Wade were overturned, the issue would be up to the States.

Women crossing state lines to get an abortion performed would then have an effect upon interstate commerce! ;)

[wagglebee]

If Roe v Wade were overturned, the issue would be up to the States.

That's odd, in post #103 you wrote:

I don't believe the State has any authority to abridge amend or fail to recognize the natural rights of man. That which is forbidden to the Federal Government in recognition of our natural rights, is similarly forbidden to the State Government.

Then in post #124 you wrote:

Covered by the 14th, of course, but in existence long before that under the concept of the natural rights of man. The 14th didn't CREATE the obligation for a non-tyrannous State government to observe our natural rights, it RECOGNIZED the obligation.

Tell me, do you consider contracteption and sodomy to be "natural rights," but not life? Why would someone support pro-choice by state if they believe in natural rights?