Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Little Lost Lambeth," What Christian Tradition, Lambeth Conference & Aldous Huxley have in common
Envoy Magazine ^ | Sept/Oct 1998 | Steven Kellmeyer

Posted on 10/24/2010 12:04:01 PM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM

Little Lost Lambeth
By Steven Kellmeyer
Photography By Robert Nease

What do a 2000 year old Christian Tradition, the Anglican Lambeth Conference and English author Aldous Huxley have in common?...

In 1930, the Anglican Church made a decision that proved tragic for the entire world. About the only two voices that realized the problem were, of course, the Catholic Church, and surprisingly, an agnostic.


The agnostic was Aldous Huxley; his book, Brave New World, would constitute not only an incredibly prophetic description of the contracepting society, but also a deft parody of the Christian church which first legalized the idea. Prior to 1930, contraception had been uniformly condemned by every Christian denomination in the world since the death of Christ.


H.G. Wells' stories of a scientific utopia combined with the publication of the Lambeth decision and Casti Connubii to fire Huxley's imagination. What would a society which fully endorsed contraception look like? Though Huxley was by no means a Catholic, he possessed a keen intellect and an incisive pen.


His conclusions were soon plain — society as we understood it would fail to survive. Writing in the grand tradition of English parody, he constructed a wickedly accurate portrayal of the contraceptive society, written so as to ensure his English audience would recognize his portrayal of the Church which had set them on the road toward it. In so doing, he inadvertently created an allegory which supports Catholic teaching...

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Catholic; Mainline Protestant; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: birthcontrol; contraception; lambeth

1 posted on 10/24/2010 12:04:03 PM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp

Very thought provoking article. Thanks for posting it.

2 posted on 10/24/2010 12:22:48 PM PDT by Vor Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp
About the only two voices that realized the problem were, of course, the Catholic Church, and surprisingly, an agnostic.

More than that. Yesterday, someone posted a 1931 editorial in The Washington Post that warned of all sorts of problems coming from this.
3 posted on 10/24/2010 12:53:46 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana
The Washington Post on the evil of contraception:

Statements by the Churches and the Secular Press Condemning Artificial Contraception Following the Anglican's Lambeth Conference of 1930

The Lutheran Church

* "Birth Control, as popularly understood today and involving the use of contraceptives, is one of the most repugnant of modern aberrations, representing a 20th century renewal of pagan bankruptcy."
— Dr. Walter A. Maier, Concordia Lutheran Theological Seminary, St. Louis, Missouri.

The Methodist Church

* "The whole disgusting [birth control] movement rests on the assumption of man's sameness with the brutes. ... Its [the Federal Council of Churches] deliverance on the matter of birth control has no authorization from any churches representing it, and what it has said I regard as most unfortunate, not to use any stronger words. It certainly does not represent the Methodist Church, and I doubt if it represents any other Protestant Church in what it has said on this subject."
— Bishop Warren Chandler, Methodist Episcopal Church South, April 13, 1931.

The Presbyterian Church

* "Its [Federal Council of Churches] recent pronouncement on birth control should be enough reason, if there were no other, to withdraw from support of that body, which declares that it speaks for the Presbyterian and other Protestant churches in ex cathedra pronouncements."
— The Presbyterian, April 2, 1931.

The Catholic Church

* "In order that she [the Catholic Church] may preserve the chastity of the nuptial union from being defiled by this foul stain, she raises her voice in token of her divine ambassadorship and through our mouth proclaims anew: any use whatsoever of matrimony exercised in such a way that the act is deliberately frustrated in its natural power to generate life is an offense against the law of God and of nature, and those who indulge in such are branded with the guilt of a grave sin."
— Pope Pius XI, Casti Connubii, December 31, 1930, Section 4, Paragraph 4.


* "Since a week ago last Saturday we can no longer expect them to defend the law of God. These sects will work out the very logic of their ways and in fifty or one hundred years there will be only the Church and paganism. We will be left to fight the battle alone — and we will."
— Father Fulton J. Sheen of the Catholic University of America. "Comments ..... and Comments On the Report of The Federal Council of Churches of Christ in America." The American Birth Control League's Birth Control Review, Volume XV, Number 4(April 1931), page 143.


* "Liberal Protestantism is really (so it seems to us and we speak with all respect for the noble solicitude it displays for human welfare, its passion for the building up of a better order of society) a new religion, but it is no longer Protestantism — it is pagan humanitarianism, it is the creed of social service built on shifting and unstable experiments, but not on the demonstrated facts of materialistic science."
— Editorial from The Commonweal of March 29, 1931. "Comments .....and Comments on the Report of The Federal Council of Churches of Christ in America." The American Birth Control League's Birth Control Review, Volume XV, Number 4 (April 1931), page 142.

The Secular Press

* "Carried to its logical conclusion, the committee's report, if carried into effect, would sound the death-knell of marriage as a holy institution by establishing degrading practices which would encourage indiscriminate immorality. The suggestion that the use of legalized contraceptives would be "careful and restrained" is preposterous."
— The Washington Post, March 22, 1931.

4 posted on 10/24/2010 1:05:28 PM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM (Liberalism is infecund.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson