Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Cronos

“All acknowledge the bishop of Rome as the primus inter pares and all share the same dogma and theology. Disciplines may differ (for example, in the Eastern Catholic Churchs, you may have married men becoming priests (but not priests getting married)), however dogma is the same.”

I know. But I still think there is a similarity, let’s say, between evangelical Baptists, Presbyterians, Congregationalists and Methodists. We all share the same basic doctrines, encapsulated in the Apostle’s creed; we all acknowledge Jesus as head of the Church and the Bible as the only source of doctrine.

We differ in “minors,” that is, church government, and/or finer points of doctrine. But we accept one another as fellow Christians.

Baptist baptize on profession of faith only; Presbyterians baptize infants of believers. It’s a different “rite.”

“Thirdly, the politico-groups you refer to such as politicos are just that — political groups, no different than “Democrats for Romney” or “Republicans for Romney” or “Chinese Juggling belly-dancers with blonde hair choosing to dance the tango with Irish kathak dancers” —> these are not Churches or a Church dogma. They are purely individual initiative groups.”

Absolutely, and I don’t like them intertwined in the “Protestant” or “Christian” groups. Presbyterians for Choice are no more Christians than Gay Catholics are. They are just usurpers, who slap the name upon themselves and then behave horribly and agitate for evil, thereby imputing evil to the Presbyterians or the Catholics they claim to “represent.”

I don’t see schismatic or heretic groups as representatives of Roman Catholics; and I don’t like it when schismatic or heretic groups are accepted as representative of Protestants. It is not fair in either case.

Similarly, I don’t hold the sexually subversive priests in the news lately as representatives of Catholics; nor should the sexually depraved big name ‘evangelists’ in the news lately be considered representative of Protestants.


28 posted on 11/18/2010 11:05:49 AM PST by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Persevero

Not really — between evangelical, non-Calvinist Baptists and Presbyterians and between Presbyterians and Methodists there is a vast gulf in the teachings on salvation for example. The basic dogma is not the same.


30 posted on 11/18/2010 9:53:02 PM PST by Cronos (This Church is Holy,theOne Church,theTrue Church,theCatholic Church - St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: Persevero
Similarly, I don’t hold the sexually subversive priests in the news lately as representatives of Catholics; nor should the sexually depraved big name ‘evangelists’ in the news lately be considered representative of Protestants.

I agree -- otherwise, people would say that Rev. "bishop" eddie Long (with his "cross it dance") and Jesse Duplantis (who supposedly went to heaven, met Jesus, Abraham, David and then comforted Christ) are reps --> btw, check out these vides of those two loons on youtube, it is hilarious, especially Jesse who makes such big ones, it's incredible people believe him!
31 posted on 11/18/2010 9:55:18 PM PST by Cronos (This Church is Holy,theOne Church,theTrue Church,theCatholic Church - St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson