This system was first introduced in the Nineteenth Century by John Darby. It teaches that Jesus did not really come yet as Christ for the Jews, but only as a suffering Messiah for the Gentiles. Traditional Christianity refers to Jesus as Christ because it teaches that He came as true Messiah/Christ for all and that there are no more distinctions between Jew and Gentile.
I don’t think one need assume they are dabbling in dispensationalism in order to recognize that they were wrong to be antisemitic. It’s not an atonement, it’s an apology. Long overdue, seems to me.
We have repeatedly documented that
that assertion is thoroughly false.
Darby was a Johnny Come Lately
to the Biblical truths about Israel, the END TIMES and dispensations.
Continue to proffer falsehoods about such truths at your own risk.
Once AGAIN
we’ll document the falseness of your UnBiblical, Unhistorically accurate assertions:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2390078/posts
Simple history of Replacement Theology 101
As for dispensationalism well that goes farther back that John Darby also:
maybe you were thinking Justin martyr?
or
Darby but again he was not the first, he just had his own little twist, Darby 101
So, I guess, like others here I do not understand what the heck you are getting at regarding the Amish. People have believed in replacement theology and killed millions of other Christians including millions of Jews in justification they are now the one true children of God, and Israel is no longer the apple of God's eye, but this is easily debunked using scripture. As for dispensationalism, people, pastors and priests and common men and women have been believing in this since the first century AD, or for non believing folks C.E.
Wow, that has got to be the most ill represented position I’ve ever seen on this subject.