Skip to comments.Flood of Noah, Earthquakes
Posted on 01/06/2011 5:21:27 PM PST by BrandtMichaels
CalvaryChurchPO | September 17, 2010 | 0 likes, 0 dislikes
Pastor Kevin Lea presents Dr. Walt Brown's Hydroplate Theory, examines the Genesis account of the flood and answers the questions: Where did the water comefrom? Where did it go? Where did the comets come from? ...and many other important questions.
(Excerpt) Read more at video.search.yahoo.com ...
The first 6-part video presentation entitled "Flood of Noah" (narrated by Pastor Kevin Lea at Calvary Churh of Port Orchard) each segment is just under 10 minutes.
The second 7-part video presentation entitled "Earthquakes" (also narrated by Pastor Kevin Lea at Calvary Churh of Port Orchard) each segment is just under 10 minutes.
More scientific evidence that demands and explanation. And gets a very graphic and detailed explanation by Dr. Walt Brown Ph.D. from M.I.T. with his hydroplate theory (first edition of this incredible and amazing book 1980) To this day his book of scientific evidence has been largely ignored and discarded by the modern day scientific community due to simple prejudicial thinking for going upstream on evolution.
Fllods are hugh and series!
Fllods are really bad news.
There`s a flood in my cellar!
Is that Fllod or Floyd?
Thanks for correcting the title.
So why is crack pot science in the Religion Forum? It doesn’t belong here anymore than “Pyramids built by space aliens”, out of place artifacts, or theories that American Indians are the lost tribe of Israel.
Well, I followed your link and came to the conclusion that Noah’s flood was caused by a guy front flipping off a roof, a motorcycle burning out, and standing cat.
This is hugh and series.
It is based on the creation story account in Genesis and the Global Flood described in chapter 7.
However, regarding the disdain you have already shown in your very 1st post, I am hesitant to answer any of your future posts.
The waters of the flood most likely amounted to the oceans of Mars getting dumped onto this planet.
Ah yes, the infamous second great commission of Christ.. Go ye to the world and preach the gospel only to people who are nice to you and give you warm fuzzy feelings.
Pre-flood Earth would have had mountains no more than 1 mile high with subterranean waters that burst forth from under 10 mile thick granite ~ the fountains of the great deep as stated in the Bible.
From both a mathematical and statistical perspective this theory ‘holds more water’ than waters transported from Mars or anywhere else outside of the Earth.
Dr. Russell Humphrey described the creation event as a 1 light-year wide ball of water in “Starlight and Time” while the Bible says God brooded or hovered over great waters.
Let’s just say from past experience it becomes obvious which posters are more willing to carry on a productive conversation.
Are you familiar with the 46,000 mile long mid-oceanic ridge ~ a long mountain range that circumnavigates the globe with the majority of it found in the great depths of the oceans?
“Pre-flood Earth would have had mountains no more than 1 mile high with subterranean waters that burst forth from under 10 mile thick granite ~ the fountains of the great deep as stated in the Bible.”
Show me where in the Holy Bible where it says the mountains were <1 mile high and the granite was 10 miles thick. Why do some people feel the need to embellish on what is stated in the Bible?
IF, as these theories state, that there was a global flood in the way some believe the transition of the Bible states, and it was caused by a upheaval so great to cause, in under 40 days, the formation of our mountains and deep ocean trenches, and even split the contents as some speculate, what would the thermal signature look like for all that tectonic action?
The energy involved would be beyond the scale and the heat generated would have to be so great that you wouldn’t have a flood event but a greenhouse event on the scale of Venus.
A massive greenhouse event that isn’t found in the Bible (nor is the splitting of the continents, nor is the rising of the mountains, nor is the ridges of the oceans..) If you are going to reject what we learn from science because you believe it is un =Biblical, you probably shouldn’t do so by adding in a bunch of unBiblical ‘evidence’ to the Bible.
If, as you say, is 40 videos on what is basically two chapters in the Bible, that is adding a LOT of non-Biblical ‘evidence’.
Part of what I’m quoting ~ the majority ~ is from:
Center for Scientific Creation - In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood
also listed on my links page. It’s part f Dr. Walt Brown’s hydroplate theory. A theory which has largely been ignored by the scientific community for almost 30 years.
It is ignored by science because Brown’s theories are as non-scientific as they are non-Biblical. Much of what he professes defies the laws of physics.
Just one quick example of holes shot all in Brown’s theories.
There is much evidence for a global flood ~ just that the majority of it is mis-interpreted by those with an evolutionary bias. A vast majority of evidence is completely ignored by evolution. For instance there are ocean fossils found on all the mountaintops.
The reason the Earth was not baked by the heat has to due with water under high heat and pressure which then enters a supercritical phase stretching the Earth’s crust, ionizing the water, and supplying enough explosive force to account for asteroids, meteoroids and comets.
Over the years ruins have been unearthed. How did they get under all the dirt and where did the people go who built them. I’m convinced they were covered with sedimentary mud from the great flood.