Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

On The Unity of The Church (cont'd)
Treatise I of St. Cyprian of Carthage [New Advent] ^ | ~250AD | St. Cyprian of Carthage

Posted on 01/08/2011 8:19:01 PM PST by marshmallow

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
And does any one believe that in one place there can be either many shepherds or many flocks?

Lots of people, apparently.

It's the overriding principle of religion in America.

1 posted on 01/08/2011 8:19:05 PM PST by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marshmallow; MilicaBee; Martin Tell; Salvation; Lemondropkid31; BenKenobi

Church Fathers ping!


2 posted on 01/08/2011 8:20:04 PM PST by marshmallow ("A country which kills its own children has no future" -Mother Teresa of Calcutta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: Natural Law

It really is a cabal. Each post the met or cool or doc ock types post is cced to every one of their cabal. And they play the standard game of shoot and move. When you prove their point wrong, some other member of the caval will jump and excerpt somethign you said (half a sentence) and post it and go on a tangent to save the original poster. Pathetique!


4 posted on 01/09/2011 3:52:52 AM PST by Cronos (Bobby Jindal 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: Cronos; Religion Moderator
Notice that my post that indicted a nameless anti-Catholic cabal in response to question 8 was deleted but posts that refer to Catholicism as a venereal disease that mind rapes children is OK. Its hard to argue that there is a level playing field for Catholics.

Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. (Matthew 5:10)

I do understand why Catholics and Catholicism is held to a different and higher standard than the members of the anti-Catholic cabal and their active and tacit supporters. We must take up our cross and carry it with pride.

From everyone who has been given much, much will be required; and to whom they entrusted much, of him they will ask all the more (Luke 12:48)

We were warned about people like these.

"Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you clean the outside of the cup and of the dish, but inside they are full of robbery and self-indulgence."(Matthew 23:25) .

6 posted on 01/09/2011 7:57:58 AM PST by Natural Law (Grant that we may be one flock and one shepherd!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Exactly.


7 posted on 01/09/2011 8:14:30 AM PST by Judith Anne (Holy Mary, Mother of God, please pray for us sinners now, and at the hour of our death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law
Your post and the one quoting it were removed because you used the word "dung" and that after I have informed you that any and all references to potty language - direct or indirect - which are not direct quotes from the Bible shall be automatically removed.
8 posted on 01/09/2011 8:25:52 AM PST by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: Natural Law

It was NOT a quote from the Bible.


10 posted on 01/09/2011 8:44:48 AM PST by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator
"It was NOT a quote from the Bible."

Since the objectionable word is not a part of modern urban life I will be sure to do more than make incomplete biblical references going forward for the benefit of those who are less biblically literate or just don't get it. Thank you

11 posted on 01/09/2011 9:02:12 AM PST by Natural Law (Grant that we may be one flock and one shepherd!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law
Since the objectionable word is not a part of modern urban life I will be sure to do more than make incomplete biblical references going forward for the benefit of those who are less biblically literate or just don't get it.

I'm sure the Catholics here would appreciate it.

The Church should combat widespread "Biblical illiteracy" among the Catholic faithful, Archbishop Eterovic said.
-- from the thread Synod to Focus on Proper Use of Scripture

12 posted on 01/09/2011 9:05:53 AM PST by Alex Murphy ("Posting news feeds, making eyes bleed, he's hated on seven continents")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
"I'm sure the Catholics here would appreciate it."

But the anti-Catholics would benefit from it far more. They would be secure in their beliefs with the help of the Magisterium under the guiding hand of the Holy Spirit instead of the self-anointed Reformers.

13 posted on 01/09/2011 9:32:52 AM PST by Natural Law (Grant that we may be one flock and one shepherd!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: Alex Murphy; Natural Law

Yup, and we can work to spread literacy amongst the PCA and OPC too — since they don’t read but rather memorise the bible by rote and there’s a difference between memorising as the PCA/OPC do and real comprehension as in orthodoxy


15 posted on 01/09/2011 9:56:11 AM PST by Cronos (Bobby Jindal 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy; Natural Law
As the article say the Synod will discuss the challenge posed by fundamental sects that promote misleading interpretations of the Scripture -- so we can help les pauvres dans le PCA et OPC
16 posted on 01/09/2011 9:57:15 AM PST by Cronos (Bobby Jindal 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cronos; Natural Law
The use of any potty language on the Religion Forum - whether direct or indirect - is not justified except when it is part of a quote from the Bible.

Gratuitous quotes from the Bible which serve no purpose other than to put such a word on the table are also unjustified.

17 posted on 01/09/2011 9:57:47 AM PST by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator
"The use of any potty language on the Religion Forum.."

Do you consider references to venereal disease potty language? I am not aware of any Biblical references to it.

18 posted on 01/09/2011 10:12:54 AM PST by Natural Law (Grant that we may be one flock and one shepherd!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law

No, the names of diseases such as AIDS, Syphilis, etc. - whether specific or general - are not potty language.


19 posted on 01/09/2011 10:15:49 AM PST by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator

Normal bodily functions are verboten in the Religion Forum, maladies derived from fornication aren’t....got it.


20 posted on 01/09/2011 10:27:33 AM PST by Natural Law (Grant that we may be one flock and one shepherd!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson