Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Lorica

Lorica he has already answered.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2687771/posts?page=22#22

“all 5 Vatican II popes are not even Catholic. Pope St. Pius X would have excommunicated all five before they even became bishops.”

What we need in these threads is for people like you and me to confront him with his previous statements so that new readers will understand where he is coming from and the kind of bad material he posts...really simple...thanks.


49 posted on 04/08/2011 12:58:23 PM PDT by Beeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: Beeline; verdugo
His working definition of sedevacantism:

Sedevacantesism (he is not a pope because he teaches error)

is simplistic, and so perhaps he has convinced himself he's not a sede. After all, that's a hard thing to have to acknowledge. But someone who doesn't believe the pope is Catholic and won't acknowledge his validity shouldn't state that he's not a sede on his homepage.

50 posted on 04/08/2011 1:11:47 PM PDT by Lorica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson