Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Royal Wedding: Archbishop Backs William and Kate's Decision to Live Together Before Marriage
The Daily Telegraph (UK) ^ | 4/29/11 | Tim Ross, Jonathan Wynne-Jones and Gordon Rayner

Posted on 04/30/2011 2:38:35 PM PDT by marshmallow

The Archbishop of York has given his backing to Prince William and Kate Middleton’s decision to live together before marriage.

The Archbishop of York backed Prince William and Kate Middleton’s decision to live together before marriage, saying that many modern couples want to “test the milk before they buy the cow”.

Dr John Sentamu argued that the royal couple’s public commitment to live their lives together today would be more important than their past.

But Anglican traditionalists criticised the Archbishop, the second most senior cleric in the Church of England, for failing to reinforce Christian teaching which prohibits sex outside marriage.

The row came as Prince William and Kate Middleton unveiled their choices for the royal wedding service, which include classically British music and hymns, and an updated choice of marriage vows in which the bride omits the word “obey”.

In a television interview, Dr Sentamu was asked whether it was appropriate for the Prince, who is in line to become head of the Church of England as King, to have been living with his bride before marriage.

He said he had conducted wedding services for “many cohabiting couples” during his time as a vicar in south London.

“We are living at a time where some people, as my daughter used to say, they want to test whether the milk is good before they buy the cow,” he said. “For some people that’s where their journeys are.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Mainline Protestant; Moral Issues
KEYWORDS: anglican; archbishopofyork; churchofengland; cohabitation; royalwedding; sentamu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 341-346 next last
To: manc
People move in together often for convenience. They don't want to spend the night at the others place, get up and go back home to get cleaned up and off to work. They shack up to help split the bills and save money, because they want to play house etc. Rarely is it because they want to commit their lives to each other forever.

With marriage however it is a commitment, because one does it out of love and deep feelings for each other and not for any financial or logistical reasons.

81 posted on 04/30/2011 3:35:10 PM PDT by LukeL (Barack Obama: Jimmy Carter 2 Electric Boogaloo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: manc
I wouldn't have done it but did the other so who am I to say? I was a single mom, never had a man move in. All three of my children have done it. Two have divorced and remarried, and one never got married, doesn't seem to want to.

Since so many do it these days, I'm not judging anyone. It's their business. I wish them all well.

I don't mean to make this all about sex because it isn't but is a big issue. Historically in Western culture, it doesn't seem to be have been important that a woman derived any sexual pleasure to the point of fulfillment, just produce children and be a good wife, the worst was chastity belts but never that female circumcision. Sometimes I wondered if little boys were neutered for singing, but I don't know. Obviously some women had to have caught on to it at some point. It was common for men to have both wives and mistresses, and the wives put up with it because it was accepted and divorces were rare and prohibited. And this was Catholic Europe. I emphasize that nothing is always true across the board.

There are hints in Chaucer and some novels that used to be on the banned list that women indeed desired sexual fulfillment as well as the man.

To me, it's all a lottery, and some people are just luckier than others. I don't condone it but neither do I condemn it (on a couple's level), just on principle because that's what the bible says and the church has always taught. Leave it to God and His mercy.

I wish you well too, glad to hear your children are growing up well. You must have learned good parenting skills along the way.

82 posted on 04/30/2011 3:35:39 PM PDT by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: scbison

http://studiesoflove.com/marriage/premaritalsexdivorce.html

Seems to contradict their other post...


83 posted on 04/30/2011 3:38:03 PM PDT by The Magical Mischief Tour (With The Resistance...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: manc

You’re changing the subject. You stated that not all couples who live together are having sex. I contend that the number of cohabiting couples abstaining from sex is so small as to be statistically insignificant.

To get a meaningful result from a poll on the subject of the goodness of shacking up, a better group to question would be couples with long, successful marriages, say 25 years or more.


84 posted on 04/30/2011 3:39:30 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Shemp was the Fourth Stooge of the Apocalypse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: scbison

You need to read that USA Today study, it clearly says the study is not reflective and the numbers are skewed because the rates of cohabitation are much, much higher today that from earlier years, so the rates of divorce from any marriages would be higher.

Its not a scientific study its simply a cautionary tale.

So far you’ve not posted anything from religious spew, something from a “love” website and this, which cautions its readers to not take it for any statistical nor scientific value.


85 posted on 04/30/2011 3:42:10 PM PDT by The Magical Mischief Tour (With The Resistance...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: abb

In that regard the archbishop’s statement could be considered progress.


86 posted on 04/30/2011 3:47:48 PM PDT by rwilson99 (Please tell me how the words "shall not perish and have everlasting life" would NOT apply to Mary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Aliska

“Some very few seem to care and respect the woman so much that they will stick by her and go without until marriage.”

Key point - thanks for sharing. If a man truly loves and respects the woman he claims to love, he will either make a lifetime commitment to her (called “marriage”), or respect her until he is ready to do so. I’m not convinced by the men on this thread who claim wonderful relationships that began with cohabitation. I’d like to ask their wives: would you had preferred - i.e., would you feel more respected - if your husband had waited for you until he actually married you? I believe the honest answers to that question would be very revealing.

My grandmother used to say of those who “tested the waters” without getting married: “Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?” As far as I can tell, it is the man who benefits from this kind of arrangement.

The Bishop of York has revealed his shallow capitulation to popular culture by abdicating from his responsibility to uphold Christian teaching that sexual relations are intended only for marriage.

Marriage requires a tremendous amount of compromise and the willingness to change and adapt to someone who is as radically different from you as men are different from women. It is utterly self-serving (and the opposite of love) to insist on becoming intimate with your “potential” wife before you are willing to commit to her. That is why so few cohabiting couples end up actually getting married.

On a personal note, I am grateful I did not cohabit with my wife beforehand, as I she probably would have backed out of marrying me once she saw how imperfect I was (and am). Thankfully, we both believed marriage to be a lifelong commitment, and are now in our 23rd year.

My Swiss wife has a saying: “Wir sind nicht immer fruendlich, aber wir sind immer treu.” Translated: We are not always friendly, but we are always true.”

And don’t get me started on the children - the love and commitment of their mother and father is the center of their world, and helps them to believe that love really exists.


87 posted on 04/30/2011 4:02:44 PM PDT by tjd1454
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
And once again the Catholic Church stands firm!!!!

There was a thread about a bishop speaking out against this co-habitation habit......pun inteneded.

88 posted on 04/30/2011 4:11:35 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

A man who wants to take my daughter for a test drive ought to remember I have a shotgun, a shovel and a large backyard...

Fornication - the old word for shacking up - is a good deal for guys and a terrible one for girls. And in the long run, it is good for neither the guy, the girl, or society. God is not mocked.

But then, I tend to think Obama is God’s judgment on our society...and figure we have no right to call God unjust. A society that rejects Him will get what it deserves.

“19Now the works of the flesh are evident: sexual immorality, impurity, sensuality, 20idolatry, sorcery, enmity, strife, jealousy, fits of anger, rivalries, dissensions, divisions, 21envy, drunkenness, orgies, and things like these. I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.”
- Galatians 5


89 posted on 04/30/2011 4:20:20 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (Poor history is better than good fiction, and anything with lots of horses is better still)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
“We are living at a time

And there is the problem with non-Catholic, protestant denominations that feel compelled to comply with the times. Their statements do not follow scripture.

90 posted on 04/30/2011 4:28:03 PM PDT by NYer ("Be kind to every person you meet. For every person is fighting a great battle." St. Ephraim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manc
I’d rather my kids live with their future spouse too instead of them now moving in once married and finding out that they have made a huge mistake like he’s a slob, she’s a layabout etc
And society's slide into immmoral oblivion continues when sin such as this becomes tolerated (and even encouraged) on a conservative website such as this. Sex before marriage is the same as adultery but who cares about those pesky Ten Commandments anyway?
91 posted on 04/30/2011 4:42:04 PM PDT by conservaterian (Sarah/DeMint '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tjd1454
the children - the love and commitment of their mother and father is the center of their world, and helps them to believe that love really exists.

Du hast Recht.

92 posted on 04/30/2011 4:46:25 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Shemp was the Fourth Stooge of the Apocalypse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: manc

Statistics say that those who live together before marriage are more likely to get divorced.


93 posted on 04/30/2011 4:49:58 PM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Well one take confort in one thing, the Archbishop looks like he is close to retirement and with more of the more conservative Anglicans taking the offer to sail down the Tiber, one day Westminister could very well be one day part of Rome.


94 posted on 04/30/2011 4:51:29 PM PDT by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: jagusafr

And in Texas, the adage is, “Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?”

I think that saying is morphing into “why buy the cow when you can milk the whole herd?”.


95 posted on 04/30/2011 4:55:14 PM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

simple for you this, if you make a stupid claim then back it up with independent sources, simple


96 posted on 04/30/2011 4:56:32 PM PDT by manc (Shame on all who voted for the repeal of DADT, who supported it or never tried to stop it. Traitors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
But then, I tend to think Obama is God’s judgment on our society

I often have similar thoughts.

97 posted on 04/30/2011 4:57:07 PM PDT by WPaCon (Obama: pansy progressive, mad Mohammedan, or totalitarian tyrant? Or all three?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: LukeL

we lived with each other as we were room mates and worked with each other, later we became more friendly and then got married.


98 posted on 04/30/2011 4:57:21 PM PDT by manc (Shame on all who voted for the repeal of DADT, who supported it or never tried to stop it. Traitors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Aliska

thank you for the kind mature post, and I wish you and your family well,


99 posted on 04/30/2011 4:58:10 PM PDT by manc (Shame on all who voted for the repeal of DADT, who supported it or never tried to stop it. Traitors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

do you actually have kids or do you preach and how you do it to others?


100 posted on 04/30/2011 4:59:03 PM PDT by manc (Shame on all who voted for the repeal of DADT, who supported it or never tried to stop it. Traitors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 341-346 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson