Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The King James Version: The Bible Translation that Changed the World
National Review ^ | 07/08/2011 | Rich Lowry

Posted on 07/08/2011 8:20:58 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last
To: dayglored
I do not believe that a modern American can consider themselves literate unless they have read the KJV, regardless of their religion or lack thereof.

I agree.

My children were put to bed listening to Alexander Scourby's taped narration of the KJV -- and acquired a mastery of English grammar and syntax that still serves them well. It used to amuse uncles and aunts to hear rich, complex, and beautifully crafted sentences spontaneously coming from 5 year old lips!

41 posted on 07/08/2011 6:32:43 PM PDT by boven_mutum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

“Foxe’s writings are largely invented out of whole cloth.”

From Wiki:

“Foxe’s great contribution, however, was his compilation of the English martyrs from the period of the Lollards through the persecution of Mary I. Here Foxe had primary sources of all kinds to draw on: episcopal registers, reports of trials, and the testimony of eyewitnesses, a remarkable range of sources for English historical writing of the period.[20]

Nevertheless, Foxe often treated this material casually, and any reader “must be prepared to meet plenty of small errors and inconsistencies.”[21] Furthermore, Foxe did not hold to later notions of neutrality or objectivity. He made unambiguous side glosses on his text, such as “Mark the apish pageants of these popelings” and “This answer smelleth of forging and crafty packing.”[22]

The material contained in the work is generally accurate, although selectively presented. Sometimes he copied documents verbatim; sometimes he adapted them to his own use. Although both he and his contemporary readers were more credulous than most moderns, Foxe presented “lifelike and vivid pictures of the manners and feelings of the day, full of details that could never have been invented by a forger.”[23] Foxe’s method of using his sources “proclaims the honest man, the sincere seeker after truth.”[24]”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foxe%27s_Book_of_Martyrs

As for Ian Paisley - I don’t know who he is. The person I quoted at length was Brian Moynahan.

I will take it you don’t want to discuss sources, or admit to what Thomas More wrote himself. Ignoring More is the only way to truly exonerate him.


42 posted on 07/08/2011 10:12:39 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (Poor history is better than good fiction, and anything with lots of horses is better still)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bump.


43 posted on 07/08/2011 10:16:29 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (When the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn (Pr.29:2))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson