Posted on 09/15/2011 5:07:38 AM PDT by Not gonna take it anymore
Religious broadcaster Pat Robertson told his "700 Club" viewers that divorcing a spouse with Alzheimer's is justifiable because the disease is "a kind of death." During the portion of the show where the one-time Republican presidential candidate takes questions from viewers, Robertson was asked what advice a man should give to a friend who began seeing another woman after his wife started suffering from the incurable neurological disorder.
(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...
God help the candidate that gets his endorsement.
There was a time 30 to 40 years ago when Robertson was a dynamic force and made sense. However, Robertson now is an old man whose ideas have gotten more off the wall as time goes on. He needs to retire. All he does is act as a prop for the MSM and Left to hold up as an example of what all conservatives think and how “crazy” and “scary” we are.
This is an insult to anyone who has ever had to care for a terminally ill spouse. Robertson has been really spouting some doozies lately.
None of those three are found in the Bible. The one that is justification for divorce is fornication.You never even mention that one. Mat 5:32 But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.
We make a very serious mistake if we rely on media like the New York Times, Newsweek, CNN, or MSNBC for reliable news about religion. These news media simply don’t provide trustworthy information about religious faith—and sometimes they can’t provide it, either because of limited resources or because of their own editorial prejudices. These are secular operations focused on making a profit. They have very little sympathy for the Catholic faith, and quite a lot of aggressive skepticism toward any religious community that claims to preach and teach God’s truth. Archbishop Charles J. Chaput, Archbishop of Philadelphia |
Of course, Mr. Robertson is not Catholic, but I think this quote is still applicable.
Bottom line: you have any verification of this?
—I must say I was shocked to read this from Robertson.—
Sadly, I’m not. I remember the reason I stopped watching that tripe quite a while ago. The proof is that when I first read the headline I was not even a little surprised. My instinctive response was, “There they go again.”
Their hearts may have been in the right place in the beginning but, as is oft’ said, power corrupts. They may even be fooling themselves. I dunno.
That's the only thing I can think of.
Man, if he actually said that... Hard to believe, coming from a “Christian”. A spouse with Alzheimer’s is more in need of loving, Christian care than most people.
When my FIL was diagnosed, we researched the subject thoroughly. Seems that people with Alzheimers often “fall in love” with a new person — usually suffering from the disease as well, and residing in the same care facility. They do live in a new and different world. They don’t remember their old life, including spouse, children, and friends. It’s hard for the spouse who’s well to deal with that, but you’ve still got to be there for them. Anyhow, FWIW...
I am normally in agreement with what Robertson says, but here he’s declared that Alzheimer’s is equivalent to death. He is wrong, and is rewriting the Bible!
—Mat 5:32 But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.—
That was a tough one for me. My wife and I were both divorced before. We had both been abandoned by our spouses when we met, about 15 years ago.
Wonder if we are forgiven.
JK.
I believe it’s adultery and abandonment. The Bible mentions nothing of abuse or addiction as justification for divorce.
If a person is willing to abuse you, he may be willing to kill you.
If a person has an addiction problem, generally speaking, getting that high is all that matters to him.
If a person has abandoned the marriage, he doesn’t consider himself married to you. There is no relationship to speak of
Are you really willing to stay married to a person who is willing to kill you, financially destroy you, or not be in a relationship at all with you?
I posted it from the CBS website.
If it is wrong then I expect that Mr. Robertson say so. If he comes out with a statement denying it, I will post that as well.
Ok, so some physical abuse is ok? Must it be “SEVERE”? I don’t understand...
My first job out of college was working for a fellow who carried on with my supervisor, who was a beautiful young woman about 20 years his junior.
The man was married to a woman with ALS. I don’t know if they had some kind of arrangement. As a young man I empathized and understood the situation and tried to keep it in perspective.
When I got married I saw it differently. I thought that it was a disgusting situation. The owner of the company, was not only unfaithful to his wife, but he also hurt his wife’s family in such a deep and personal way. They hated him for what he had done. He harmed the young woman that he carried on with ~ she was basically a whore and she knew it. She suffered with guilt for years after she finally had the courage to break off the relationship. He also hurt his own 2 sons, one 17 and one 23 at the time. They got to watch their father carry on with a woman that was a few years older than them while he cheated on the woman who gave them life. Yuck!
In retrospect this guy could have done a couple of things, he could have been weak, but discrete in this relationship. This would still be sinful. He was NOT in the least. It would not have affected anyone else a much.
He loved having this young woman on his arm and flaunting the fact that they had a sexual relationship while his wife lay dying in her bed. Pretty disgusting.
He could have had the decency to simply wait until his wife, who suffered a horrible death, departed this life.
Of course.
If it is wrong then I expect that Mr. Robertson say so. If he comes out with a statement denying it, I will post that as well.
Of course.
I am always very suspicious of secular media reports about things religious (unless, of course, those things are the "right" (left) religious beliefs).
((sigh))... what is it about PR? He says the exact wrong thing every few years.
Do people really watch or send money to this toad anymore?
Any good Christian (are there any anymore in the public sector) should and would know better than to say something as cruel as this. If he really said that, then he’s a disgrace.
Jonty, It seems that you’ve met my soon-to-be-ex wife!
Well said. And as an Evangelical Christian, Pat does not speak for me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.