Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Medical experts blast claim that nuns need contraception
cna ^ | December 10, 2011 | Michelle BAUMAN

Posted on 12/10/2011 6:44:40 AM PST by NYer

Women religious at World Youth Day 2011 in Madrid.

Washington D.C., Dec 10, 2011 / 08:05 am (CNA).- An article claiming that nuns should use contraception to lower their risk of breast, ovarian and uterine cancers drew criticism from medical professionals who say the study’s basis is seriously flawed.

Karen Brauer, president of Pharmacists for Life International, said the argument was so poorly made that she initially thought the article was a parody.

“It’s that bad,” she told CNA on Dec. 8, adding that the claims were not only outlandish but unsupported by the evidence presented in the analysis.

Australian researchers Kara Britt and Roger Short penned a Dec. 8 article in the international medical journal The Lancet warning that nuns “pay a terrible price for their chastity.”

They argued that because they never bear children, nuns have a higher probability of death from breast, ovarian, and uterine cancers.

Britt and Short lamented the “plight” of religious sisters and called on the Church to “make the oral contraceptive pill freely available to all its nuns” in order to decrease risk of these cancers.

But Brauer pointed out that this claim is misleading, even according to the study on which the authors based their arguments.

Referencing a graph included in the article, she noted that before age 70, the nuns actually had a lower rate of death from uterine cancer than the control group. Their comparative rates of death from ovarian cancer fluctuated before age 80, being at times above, below and equal to that of the control group.

According to the study, breast cancer was the only one for which the nuns were consistently at higher risk than the control group of women, said Brauer. However, Britt and Short did not claim that the pill would reduce the risk of breast cancer, as they did for ovarian and uterine cancer, but simply that it would “not increase” the risk of breast cancer.

In addition, said Brauer, women who use oral contraceptives face “considerable” negative side effects. These include a significantly increased risk of deep venous thrombosis, which causes potentially life-threatening blood clots—a fact that Britt and Short acknowledged.

For these reasons, using the pill only to prevent disease “doesn’t make any sense,” she said.

Oncologist Dr. Luis Raez weighed in that the Lancet article has more political significance than scientific value.

Raez told CNA on Dec. 8 that because of the risk of side effects that accompanies any pill, doctors generally use prescription drugs to treat cancer and diseases rather than prevent them.

In the case of the oral contraceptive pill, users are at higher risk of blood clots and hypertension, among other conditions, he said.

He also observed that even among women such as nuns who do not bear children, ovarian and uterine cancers are rare.

Such cancers are often curable if discovered early through regular checkups, he added, noting that the pill's actual benefits would likely be minimal as it does not eliminate the risk of these cancers.

Raez argued that it would be absurd to use oral contraception in hopes of preventing a rare type of cancer while putting yourself at elevated risk for other serious problems.

He also said that most women who take the pill do so for only a limited number of years, because they stop using contraceptives when they decide to have children. However, nuns, who never have children, could be on the pill for multiple decades.

The risk factors of using the pill in this way have not been adequately evaluated for such a course of action to be recommended, he underscored.

TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; Moral Issues; Religion & Science
KEYWORDS: chastity; contraception; lancet; nuns; romancatholic

1 posted on 12/10/2011 6:44:44 AM PST by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom; thefrankbaum; Tax-chick; GregB; saradippity; Berlin_Freeper; Litany; SumProVita; ...


2 posted on 12/10/2011 6:45:26 AM PST by NYer ("Be kind to every person you meet. For every person is fighting a great battle." St. Ephraim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Whats the difference between giving birth control to 12 year olds in school or 50 somethings in the convent? Its obvious that society cant survive long without the governments help.

'Course with the nuns getting birth control, the HPV vaccine cant be that far behind.

Its for their own good !!

3 posted on 12/10/2011 7:13:16 AM PST by Delta 21 (Make your choice ! There are NO civilians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

It’s only “contraception” if there’s a possibility of conception. In other situations, one could avoid the (probably intentional) scandalous garble by saying “oral hormone supplementation.” Then, the discussion of whether it’s medically advisable for non-childbearing women to use these hormonal drugs to reduce cancer risk could proceed with much less silliness.

4 posted on 12/10/2011 7:24:52 AM PST by Tax-chick (I'm surrounded by sullen mammals and ravenous reptiles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

“An article claiming that nuns should use contraception to lower their risk of breast, ovarian and uterine cancers drew criticism from medical professionals who say the study’s basis is seriously flawed.”

I take it they mean “the Pill” vice an IUD or foam, eh?

5 posted on 12/10/2011 7:34:46 AM PST by PLMerite (Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

This faux study is nothing but loose stool.

Oral contraceptive pills are a Class 1 carcinogen (proven to cause cancer in humans) according to the international health body that classifies carcinogens.

(Hey evil harpies: If you won’t embrace the light then it seems you will go to hell.)

6 posted on 12/10/2011 7:49:00 AM PST by Notwithstanding (1998 ACU ratings: Newt=100%, Paul=88%, Santorum=84% [the last year all were in Congress])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
There are situations in which oral contraceptives are recommended for "off label" applications.

The most common is probably dysmenorrhea, or very painful periods. They run in our family. We're talking anemia, cramps that double you over, and copious bleeding for as long as two weeks at a time.

In that sort of situation, oral contraceptives are hailed in welcome, believe me.

They now have a very low dosage pill that is not effective in preventing conception but will reduce the cramping and bleeding. So that removes the odium of taking birth control.

7 posted on 12/10/2011 9:02:08 AM PST by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Bravo Sierra! I had to take some strong stuff to get pregnant with my son and after I had him I went back on the Pill that I had been on since I was sixteen. I felt like crap so I quit taking it. I will never go back on it after I did some research. I was put on it because I have PCOS, and I was told that it would help with that condition. Yeah, all it did was mask the symptoms but I was never told that. So after much personal research I made a lot of changes to my diet and absolutely avoid any meat injected with hormones. Guess what? I just had baby number two with no fertility drugs! Chemical birth control is the devil!

8 posted on 12/10/2011 9:36:08 AM PST by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother
Been there! Then I eliminated sugar and hormones from my diet. I avoid all low-fat, fat-free, sugar-free, low-cal “food”, as well as hydrogenated and partially hydrogenated oils. After about six months things started getting better. I started making whole fruit and veg smoothies in my Vitamix and incorporate as much kale as possible.
9 posted on 12/10/2011 9:39:36 AM PST by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: goodwithagun

Congrats on your baby!

When I was a teenager & in my 20’s, I had debilitating periods. Vomiting, horrendous cramps, bleeding for over 2 weeks. Someone told me to get on the Pill. So at age 14, my mom took me to the gyn who stuck me on that POS. I felt awful for over 10 years. Then I found the Atkins diet & low carb lifestyle. I no longer follow Atkins like I used to, but I eat only whole grains - no refined carbs. And I follow a clean-eating diet, almost totally organic.

Changing how I ate was the answer. Not that evil, horrible Pill with it’s awful side effects.

10 posted on 12/10/2011 11:21:43 AM PST by surroundedbyblue (Live the message of Fatima - pray & do penance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Why would they need contraceptive medications? Haven’t they taken a vow of chastity?

I guess they could take it — if they want breast cancer.

11 posted on 12/10/2011 1:39:54 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: surroundedbyblue; AnAmericanMother; goodwithagun

Four Steps You Can Take Every Day to Keep Your Immune System Running Strong/Keep Healthy

With the hustle and bustle of the holidays, the last thing you want is to be slowed down by an immune system that’s not running at its peak.

Strive to reach these four goals every day to stay strong and face the season healthy and in good spirits!

Get enough sleep. Researchers have discovered that the immune system functions best during the night*, so make sure to catch all the rest you can this time of year to be your best self.

Eat whole foods. We know you’re being tempted right now by tons of sweet treats loaded with sugar, fat, and preservatives. As much as you can, try to load your plate with whole foods – things your grandmother would recognize as food, such as lean meats, fruits, vegetables, grains, and low-fat dairy products. Making sure you’re getting a wide variety of fruits and vegetables means you’ll be getting tons of antioxidants and fiber. Antioxidants help ward off immunity-damaging free radicals, while fiber bolsters your digestive system, which plays a large role in immunity.

Exercise. You don’t have to train to run a marathon to see the immune-building benefits of exercise – and consistent, moderate activity might actually be more beneficial. Research continues to support the finding that there is a link between regular exercise and a healthy immune system. Try engaging in some sort of activity every day for at least 30 minutes. Walking counts. Just make sure you’re consistent with the activity that you enjoy!

Wash your hands often. Keeping hands clean is a great way to stop the spread of immune-dampening agents. Warm water and soap will do the trick. Make sure to wash up before, during, and after preparing, serving, and eating food. You should also make sure to wash your hands before and after caring for someone who is ill, before and after treating a wound, after using the bathroom, after playing with a pet or taking care of their waste, or after touching garbage. You can’t wash your hands too much, so just use common sense in deciding when to wash.

*Source: Stanford University study.

12 posted on 12/10/2011 1:46:24 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NYer

women often need to be put on the pill for non contraceptive purposes.

It’s not just nuns, but career women and women who have had their tubes tied and don’t need contraception...

Women who never have had a baby have more problems with endometriosis, for example.

And often you get heavy periods or severe pain or irregular periods that interfere with your ability to work.

Then there are those of us who took it to shrink ovarian cysts ...

The only nuns who I knew took the pill for it’s contraceptive protection was when I worked in Africa and we were in danger of being attacked by local “insurgents”...

after the stories of what happened to the nuns in the Congo, the bishop gave the younger nuns permission to use them “to regulate their cycle” if they desired (and if it gave them protection from rape induced pregnancy, that was beside the point)...

13 posted on 12/10/2011 6:37:59 PM PST by LadyDoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LadyDoc
women often need to be put on the pill for non contraceptive purposes.

The more cycles of fertility a woman goes through the greater her chance of breast cancer. Those whose menarche is late, who have given birth early and often, breastfed for longer rather than shorter periods, and had an earlier menopause are less likely than the opposite to develop breast cancer (the BRCA mutation notwithstanding).
14 posted on 12/10/2011 7:07:55 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson