Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Missing the Missalís Mass of Potential (New Translation Comments) [Catholic Caucus]
CE.com ^ | December 16th, 2011 | Louie Verrecchio

Posted on 12/16/2011 7:45:36 PM PST by Salvation

Missing the Missal’s Mass of Potential

December 16th, 2011 by Louie Verrecchio

After years of discussion, preparation and anticipation, the new English translation of the Roman Missal – Third Edition was officially implemented in the United States on November 27. The “reviews” are now starting to show up in newspapers, blogs, and other media.

As I read them, it seems as though most of the “people in the pews” are either positive about the new text, or they are at the very least willing to approach the changes as an opportunity for spiritual growth.

Some media outlets, however, are doing their level best to trumpet the negative by highlighting the opinions of a disgruntled minority composed largely, it seems, of aging liberals and self-anointed cognoscenti.

The Washington Post Blog, for example, featured the insights of a guest writer who boasted of a “theological degree” and having “studied the liturgy for thirty years” presumably as qualifications for summarily dismissing the new translation as an exercise in “what the hierarchy wants” as opposed to “what the Catholic faithful actually need.”

As compelling evidence that the new text is unacceptably “complex and clunky,” this liturgical-expert-come-blogger highlighted changes made in the Eucharistic prayers, pointing out, “In the story of the Last Supper, retold at every Mass, it used to be that Jesus took ‘the cup.’ Now, instead he takes ‘the precious chalice.’”

O, the horror of it all!

This sort of sophistry would be amusing if not for the sad truth being made plain; namely, not even three decades of liturgical study and a theology degree is enough to guarantee that one is able (much less willing) to conceive of the Mass according to “the mind of the Church.” Neither, does it seem, is Holy Orders.

On this note, one report in particular caught my eye, coming as it did from a bishop in his weekly diocesan newspaper column.

While acknowledging that the faithful’s reaction to the new Missal was “overwhelmingly positive,” he went on to write, “Nearly all the priests I spoke to expressed regrets that the new language made it difficult for them to enter deeply into prayer during the Mass because they were distracted by the book. A change of just one or two words created an obstacle that will take some time before our priests are able to celebrate the Mass in [a] prayer-filled and zestful style…”

With all due respect, this commentary makes it clear that the new translation alone — for all of its poetry, elevated language and faithfulness to the original Latin — isn’t going to do much to deter the liturgical priest-as-centerpiece mindset that has so plagued the Church for the last forty years. Furthermore, it raises some serious questions.

Does the bishop mean to suggest that a priest simply praying the Mass reverently and devoutly, believing and intending what the Church intends and believes, is somehow deficient? It would seem to me that this is all that is truly required (even desired) of the priest; in fact, as far as I’m concerned anything ostensibly “added” on his part can only serve to subtract from the liturgy.

Also, what does “distracted by the book” mean? Distracted from what, exactly? Taken in context, this comment seems to imply that the text in the new edition of the Roman Missal, thanks to our priests’ relative unfamiliarity, is somehow handcuffing their creativity. And this is a bad thing how?

Perhaps the most troubling and revealing questions these comments raise concern the notion of “style.”

What on earth is meant by a “zestful style?” To what end is this necessary or even desirable in the celebration of Holy Mass? Is it imagined to be for the benefit of the assembly — a sign intended to reassure those present that Father is “all-in” with the prayers of the Mass, or is it for the benefit of Father himself –- a way for the priest to reassure himself that he’s giving the liturgy, and the people present, the help they presumably both need?

Taken as a whole, the bishop’s commentary seems to suggest that he and the priests with whom he spoke simply assume, in the manner of Protestant ministers, that it is incumbent upon them to bring a certain stage presence to the Mass wherein “style points” are earned by those clerics who offer (perform, perhaps) the prayers of the liturgy with the kinds of expressive intonations they consider necessary to somehow enhance the celebration.

Well, I have some good news and some bad news for all concerned. The good news is that the pressure to perform that these clerics are feeling is artificial and largely self-imposed; having little to do with what is actually required of them and even less to do with the liturgy’s true nature.

The bad news is that too many of our priests and bishops (and by natural extension, laity) don’t seem to get it.

In the aforementioned column, the bishop chose to highlight the thoughts of a local pastor who offered the following commentary in his parish bulletin:

“My unfamiliarity with the new translation has led to a rupture in my ability to enter deeply into prayer with all of you. I realize now the great gift I have been given in such a community that prays so well together. It is more than simply good liturgy (although we have that in spades) or careful preparation. It is about the way we come together as the Body of Christ to listen to and to support one another in prayer and in sacrifice.”

What inspired the bishop to share this pseudo-catechetical exercise in clerical self-pity with the entire diocese is a mystery all its own, but be that as it may, here’s some more good news; it’s not all about you, Father! The liturgy isn’t even, as you suppose, about the community assembling “to listen to and to support one another,” as though “entering deeply into prayer” at Holy Mass is some sort of Christian group hug abetted by familiarity.

No! It’s about entering into the Redemptive work of Christ; it’s about Divine worship; it’s about sacred mystery.

If my frustration is showing, forgive me. Yes, the new Missal offers the potential of helping the Church take a major step in the right direction, but my God! How much longer must we suffer under the weight of this decades-long liturgical crisis in which so many of our people insist on behaving as though Christ is no more present and operative in the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass than He is when two or more ---- Boy Scouts are praying ‘round a campfire?

And just for the record, I’m not simply talking about the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist alone, but rather the transcendent presence of Christ in the entirety of the sacred rite wherein He is uniquely active among us.

Speaking in September of 2010, Master of Pontifical Liturgical Celebrations Monsignor Guido Marini addressed this distorted view saying, “[The liturgy does not] deal with a mere assembly of persons who share an ideal and intend to form a community; rather, it deals with a celebration by which we truly enter into a relationship with the mystery of our salvation…”

He went on to talk about what it means to truly “enter” the liturgy, saying, “To enter into a reality… involves man in his every dimension: intellect, will, emotion, sentiment, action, etc. The external nature of action and its interior foundation result as complementary and necessary. And so it is for the liturgical life…” he continued, “if there is participation that comes about by means of comprehending a text, it is also a form of participation that occurs when the soul is uplifted as it encounters the beautiful.”

As for the erroneous suggestion that liturgical texts must be eminently comprehensible on a merely human intellectual level, Monsignor Marini said, “It seems to me that, according to the law of the pendulum, if at one time the lack of adequate participation [in the liturgy] may have been due to a defect in understanding and action, today such a lack of adequate participation may be due to an excess of rational comprehension and external action, to which there is not always present a sufficient and complementary understanding of the heart and attention to the interior action, so as to re-live in oneself the sentiments and thoughts of Christ.”

With all of this said, it must also be noted that even in the sentiments expressed by those who are largely positive about the new Missal there are red flags waving.

My pastor, for example, said to the assembled faithful following Mass on the First Sunday of Advent, with neither malice nor negativity intended, “Three or four weeks from now, it will be as though nothing has changed.”

I fear he is right, and this is why we must confront head-on the very real danger that the faithful sons and daughters of Holy Mother Church may ultimately find themselves encouraged to accomplish little more than to adopt new words; remaining deprived of the prescription put forth by the Council Fathers who said, “Pastors of souls must zealously strive to promote the full and active participation of all the people in the sacred liturgy by means of the necessary instruction of the faithful” (cf SC 14).

This “necessary” liturgical instruction, according to Pope Benedict XVI, is best considered “mystagogical catechesis;” i.e., teaching that illuminates, to the extent that this is possible, Holy Mass as sacred mystery, that we might deepen our participation therein as we “grow in our awareness of the mystery being celebrated and its relationship to daily life” (cf Sacramentum Caritatis).

If we’re honest, we must admit that in spite of all the Roman Missal workshops, bulletin inserts and homilies over the last year, the official implementation milestone is really just a small first step in preparing the way for the Roman Missal, that it might be the impetus for renewal it has the potential to be.

Sir Winston Churchill’s famous 1942 quote after a decisive WW II battle seems entirely apropos in this case as well: “Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.”

 

Louie Verrecchio is a Catholic speaker and the author of Harvesting the Fruit of Vatican II; an internationally acclaimed adult faith formation tool, endorsed by George Cardinal Pell, that explores the documents of the Second Vatican Council. For more information please visit: www.harvestingthefruit.com.




TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; General Discusssion; Prayer; Worship
KEYWORDS: catholic; eucharist; liturgy; mass; prayer; translations
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-57 next last
Some bishops and priests need to grow up -- my opinion.

If, we in the pews are happy, what's to be gained by all this needless discussion.

Bite the bullet and do it! Then thank God, because you will notice a change in yourselves, dear priests.

1 posted on 12/16/2011 7:45:53 PM PST by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Missing the Missal’s Mass of Potential (New Translation Comments) [Catholic Caucus]
BREAST-BEATING DURING THE CONFITEOR (Catholic Caucus)
Fr. Raymond J. de Souza on the "real hero" behind the new missal translation [Catholic Caucus]
Surpassing All Expectations . . . The New Missal Translation Is A Spectacular Success
The Assent Owed to Vatican II (Catholic Caucus)
Senior bishops predict great results from new Mass translation
New prayers for Advent season [Catholic Caucus] (Read and Rejoice!)
Missal 3.0 – Part 5 [Catholic Caucus]
Catholics Revise Mass; Changes Get Mixed Reviews
Will Catholic Mass Changes Cause Mass Confusion?
Missal 3.0 – Part 4 [Catholic Caucus]
Missal 3.0 – Part 3 [Catholic Caucus]
The New Roman Missal: There Will Be Blood (Catholic Caucus)
Missal 3.0 – Part 2 [Catholic Caucus]
Missal 3.0 – Part 1 [Catholic Caucus]
Mass participation—in body and spirit(Catholic caucus)
Bishop Slattery: "They shouldn't have viewed the old liturgy...as something that needed to...
The Catholic Lectionary (Webiste)
First Sunday with the real translation

Revised Roman Missal binds Catholics across a 2,000-year history
ICEL’s Executive Director: New Missal Translation ‘Long Overdue’ [Catholic Caucus]
Vatican promotes more use of 1962 Roman Missal; not all priests know it (Catholic Caucus)
English bishops say new Mass translation offers chance to deepen faith (Catholic Caucus)
Tradition and Progress Not Opposed, Pope Tells Liturgy Conference
Welcoming the new Mass translation
A Biblical Walk Through the Mass (Book Review) [Ecumenical]
Ratzinger on Liturgical Law
Eight Reasons Why Men Only Should Serve at Mass [Catholic Caucus]
If liberals hate the new translation, it must be good.
Why Kneel for Communion
[CATHOLIC CAUCUS] Clerical Dress in the City of Rome in the 19th Century (Part 2 of 2)
[CATHOLIC CAUCUS] Clerical Dress in the City of Rome in the 19th Century (Part 1 of 2)
The Biblical and Heavenly Roots of the Sacred Liturgy
[CATHOLIC CAUCUS] The Mass in Slow Motion – The Kyrie (Lord Have Mercy)
On the Mend: The Church in the Early 21st Century
[CATHOLIC CAUCUS] Now This is Communion
[CATHOLIC CAUCUS] The Mass in Slow Motion – The Penitential Rite
[CATHOLIC CAUCUS] The Mass in Slow Motion – The Greeting by the Celebrant
[CATHOLIC CAUCUS] The Mass in Slow Motion – The Sign of the Cross

Replies to five objections about the new Missal translation
On EWTN this Autumn: The Biblical Story of the Mass
Ratzinger’s Opera omnia on Liturgy Presented at Meeting
[CATHOLIC CAUCUS] The Mass in Slow Motion – The Celebrant Goes to the Chair
[ECUMENICAL] QUAERITUR: lay Communion minister wouldn’t bless me
Vatican issues final text of the Roman Missal, Third Edition [Catholic Caucus]
Because of the Divine Beauty of the Mass
New Roman Missal Translation Contains Some Last Minute Changes [Catholic Caucus]
Milwaukee priests lament more accurate Roman Missal translation; ‘salt in the wounds’ (Catholic Cau)
[CATHOLIC/ORTHODOX CAUCUS] Clergy to convene, discuss Catholic missal changes (waah alert)
Sacrosanctum Concilium Meant Mass Ad Orientem and in Latin
The Catholic Mass in 155 A.D.
Different Kinds of Silence at Mass
The Priest's Preparation and Thanksgiving for Mass
Vatican official: "The new Mass is a passing phase. In 50 years, that will be entirely clear."
New English Mass Translation from 2011 Advent
Catholic Caucus: New Roman Missal of the Mass
“And With Your Spirit” – It’s Not What You Think
Catholics reach back to church tradition
Truth in the New Translation Series # 4: The Hanc Igitur of the Roman Canon

Bishop Tobin: Get Ready – The Mass is About to Change
The Introductory Rites: No mere greeting
The New Missal: Disaster or Opportunity?
Truth in the New Translation Series #3: The Communicantes of the Roman Canon
The New Missal: Disaster or Opportunity?
Blue Liturgical Vestments (and more on Paschal Candles)
The Future Liturgy of an Anglican Ordinariate: Why not Sarum?
Worship: Entertainment vs. Liturgy (open)
More Reflections on Liturgical Language [Anglo-Catholic Perspective on Latin vs Vernacular Debate]
Helping American Catholics Learn the New Missal
Pope receives copy of complete English translation of Roman Missal
[Catholic Caucus] Prayer and Belief [Pope Benedict targets abuses in the liturgy]
Pope hopes English translation of Missal will be 'springboard for a renewal'
New Mass Translation Given Rome's Approval
Prayer, Magic, Superstition and the Mediaeval Liturgy
The Old Mass Returns
Live Thread: Pontifical High Mass, National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception (Ecumenical)
The Coptic Orthodox Divine Liturgy (for those interested in comparative liturgies)
Card. Castrillon-Hoyos Out At Latin Mass - Breaking
44% of Germans Want the Old Mass

Pope Benedict uses older ritual for his private Mass
Interesting Liturgical Commentaries from the Office for Liturgical Celebrations of Supreme Pontiff
Putting Flesh on the Word “Catholic” — Easter Mass in Bali, Indonesia
Easter Mass becomes papal pep rally in Rome
Catholic Mass revisions launch war of words
"Let Us Live With Him! Let Us Learn >From Him!" (Pope's homily at the Mass of the Lord's Supper)
THE PRIEST IN THE COMMUNION RITES - Liturgy Prepares for Reception of the Eucharist
All Should Offer Their Bodies and Blood at Mass (Father Cantalamessa) [Catholic Caucus]
Can't the Holy Father Just Make the Liturgical Reform Happen?
Pope wants crucifix at the centre of ALL westward-facing altars during Mass
Benedict XVI's "Novel" Traditions
Telling Time By the Catholic Church
Good Hymns, Bad Hymns
Order of the Mass (New Translation Catechesis Part I)(Catholic Caucus)
Open Ears, Open Heart (Preparing to Receive the Liturgy of the Word each Sunday)
Effort to stop new liturgical translations at USCCB meeting fails
Church Awaits Word on Liturgical Reform
Vatican Denies Liturgical Reform Reports
(Cardinal) Newman on Rites and Ceremonies
Explains The Supreme Importance Of The Liturgy

Altar Card for the Modern Roman Liturgy
Slating the Chairs (USCCB prepares for its November plenary session)
Mass appeal: "It's like Jolt Cola for the Soul" [Catholic Caucus]
All Four Pending Liturgical Items Pass; Work On The Translation Of The New Roman Missal Continues
WHERE THE PRIEST SHOULD BEGIN MASS
GUIDELINES FOR THE PUBLICATION OF LITURGICAL BOOKS [New Missal] (Long)
AND WITH YOUR SPIRIT, Et cum spiritu tuo, (New Missal liturgical translations)
The New Missal - Historic Moment in Liturgical Renewal [Bishop Serratelli]
Know Him in the Breaking of Bread - A Guide to the Mass
Vatican liturgical official makes new plea for 'reform of the reform'
Liturgical Vestments (and prayers the priest says while vesting for Mass)
Vestments… Tools of the Liturgical Trade! [Ecumenical]
The (Catholic) Mass (as explained by a youth for Evangelical friends) [Ecumenical]
What the Catholic Mass means to converts
The "Old" Liturgical Movement: 1947 "Benedictine" Arrangement [Catholic Caucus]
Good News for the [Catholic] Liturgy
'An Ordinance Forever' - The Biblical Origins of the Mass [Ecumenical]
The Sacrifice of the Mass: Liturgical Vestments
What Do You See at (Catholic) Mass?
Purification of Sacred Vessels in U.S. (and more on the Purification of our Lord)

Tyranny of Words (Catholic liturgy - NO vs. TLM)
Mass should be enlightening and elevating, not a cookie cutter ritual
What You {Catholics} Need to Know: Mass (Sacred Liturgy) [Catholic/Orthodox Caucus]
"The Catholic Mass ... Revealed"
The Battle Over the Mass [Catholic Caucus]
Scriptural Basis of the Mass as Sacrifice (Where is that in the Bible?)
Giving to God in Mass [Liturgy of the Eucharist]
Liturgy, Learning and the Language of the Catholic Faith
Cardinal Arinze's Mass Etiquette 101
Prostration and Vestments on Good Friday And More on the Precious Bloodbr> Catholic Liturgy - Funeral Masses for a Suicide And More on Confession for RCIA Candidates
The Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass - A Primer for Clueless Catholics (Part 1)
The Orthodox Divine Liturgy, the Roman Catholic Mass and the Anglican Eucharist...
Catholic Liturgy - Dramatic Readings at Mass (And More on Processions, and Extra Hosts)
Catholic Liturgy - Mass Intentions
Catholic Liturgy - Pre-recorded Music at Mass And More on Communion Services
Vatican: Matters to be observed or to be avoided regarding the Most Holy Eucharist (April 23, 2004)
POPE ISSUES APOSTOLIC LETTER ON THE SACRED LITURGY
Liturgy: Are Glass Chalices OK for Mass?
EUCHARIST: HOLY MEAL

2 posted on 12/16/2011 8:01:04 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; NYer; ELS; Pyro7480; livius; ArrogantBustard; Catholicguy; RobbyS; marshmallow; ...

Your comments?


3 posted on 12/16/2011 8:03:08 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Old joke:

Q: What’s the difference between a liturgist and a terrorist?

A: You can negotiate with a terrorist ...


4 posted on 12/16/2011 8:11:57 PM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Some folks simply need to be informed as to “why” the changes were made.

These translations are “formal”, whereas the prior translations were not.
Previously, they were only intend to “convey the intent”.

These formal translations are richer in meaning and content.

To be better informed, you may be interested in the Magnificat, Roman Missal Companion - $4

>http://www.magnificat.com/romanmissal/roman_missal_companion.asp<


5 posted on 12/16/2011 8:17:36 PM PST by G Larry ("I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his Character.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

LOL!


6 posted on 12/16/2011 8:23:48 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

Good recommendation.


7 posted on 12/16/2011 8:24:39 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
It's all gnat droppings in pepper.
The crux of the Mass is the Transubstantiation. We have the privelege of taking in the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Jesus. Who cares if there is an extra word or two and we say "and with your spirit" instead of "and also with you"???

People are fixating on the WRONG THING. I wish people would just let it go. It's like the tax people who change the rules, regulations and forms for paying taxes. I just send the papers to the accountant, pay the taxes and get on with it.
Bells and whistles.

Now, aren't you glad you asked? :o):o)

8 posted on 12/16/2011 8:25:38 PM PST by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

I noticed the word “consubstantial” last Sunday and was puzzled. Surely this is not an everyday English word. Surely, for something this significant, every word was chosen, discussed and agreed upon before publication.

My mother disagrees. She thinks that the Missal is meant to elevate our vocabulary and words like these are welcome. I love her dearly but disagree.


9 posted on 12/16/2011 8:37:28 PM PST by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cloudmountain

You are a riot. Thanks for your comments.


10 posted on 12/16/2011 8:39:17 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cicero2k

Father Jeremy Driscoll of Mount Angel (close to where I live) gave a talk about the Vox Clara committee that he was on.

Tell your mom that Father Jeremy said we would notice three things.

Higher English register — we are no longer Catholic dummies.

Longer sentences — congruent with the Latin.

A greater adhesion to the Latin — your mom can take out her old 1962 Missal and the prayers are practically the same.

BTw.

Con = with in Latin
substantial = substance in Latin

So the phrase means that Christ (is with) has the same substance as God the Father.


11 posted on 12/16/2011 8:43:03 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cicero2k

Is consubstantial less understandable than “one in being”? That’s not a phrase I have ever used outside of Mass.

I went over the new prayers with my 6th grade CCD students and we spent a few minutes on that word. I think they understand it now and 10 years from now they won’t remember it any other way.


12 posted on 12/16/2011 8:54:47 PM PST by Straight Vermonter (Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
I am a simple woman. There were no altar girls when I grew up and now we women can participate in the Mass by being lectors and Eucharistic ministers. We can also be sacristans. How fortunate we are, I think, to be able to do these things.

Why do so many people cavil at some word changes? I had the chance to go to the Holy Land and we saw the Upper Room where the very first Mass was held. I got to see Calvary, Christ's Tomb...and we heard Mass there too. With those things on my mind WHY would I worry about some simple syntax changes?

Life is TOO SHORT to sweat the small stuff.

Ya know what I mean, jellybean?

13 posted on 12/16/2011 9:09:38 PM PST by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
These translations are “formal”, whereas the prior translations were not.

Previously, they were only intend to “convey the intent”.

Strictly speaking, the prior translations were intended to obscure and contradict the intent of the liturgy, not convey it. That's why the old hippies are so peeved now. That darned hierarchy in Rome is shoe-horning the meaning of the Mass back into it, undoing all their hard work of softening the Mass and making it meaningless.

Was that Bishop Troutman being referred to? That old heretic should protest the changes by taking a vow of silence. It would be a penance for him, alas, but not for us.

14 posted on 12/16/2011 9:34:31 PM PST by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

The worst thing about turning the altar around is that we now get to see the priest’s face, all the time. At first I thought it a good idea. The priest could share with us all what was going on. But it soon the priest became the “star”of the drama. Less about HIM, than him. So like any actor, he couldn’t resist interpreting his role. Deadly if he lacks a compelling personality. Dangerous if he does.


15 posted on 12/16/2011 9:36:18 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

“Again HE took the cup, gave it to his disciples...’’ It’s worked for 2,000 years just as Jesus said it, correct? It’s all I ever needed to hear. Why the navel-gazing and endless debate? My memory isn’t always the best at my age but didn’t OUR LORD speak of the ‘’prattling of many tongues ‘’ meaning those who would confuse or distort HIS message? I agree with ‘’cloudmountain’’. ‘’gnat droppings(I like that.)


16 posted on 12/16/2011 9:37:59 PM PST by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; cicero2k
Consubstantial is also the key word in the Creed. It is the Latin translation of the Greek word devised by the Council of Nicaea to distinguish the teaching of the Church from that of the archpriest Arius.
It is a technical term, criticized by Arius and his friends because it is not in the Bible. It is a shibboleth. If you say it, you are a Catholic; if you don't, you are an Arian. And if you are an Arian, you do not believe that Jesus was truly God, but a highly exalted creature of God.
17 posted on 12/16/2011 9:44:29 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

It never was a cup it was a chalice.


18 posted on 12/16/2011 9:45:48 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Ah, hate to disagree with you Salvation but every Mass I go to it’s ‘’cup’’. The definition of the word ‘’chalice’’ is ‘’a drinking cup’’.


19 posted on 12/16/2011 9:52:43 PM PST by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa
Remember the line about more accurate to the Latin. The 'cup' that Christ would have used was a two-handled chalice. So they are being true to the history -- higher language -- and Latin accuracy.

 
 

20 posted on 12/16/2011 9:58:46 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

The reason is that words have meaning. The first meaning of chalice is, of course, cup, from the Latin “calix.” But during the middle ages, it acquired a special meaning: a cup for the Eucharistic wine.

In other words, in using “cup” with the general meaning, the translators ignored the special meaning. Not just “a” cup, but a cup used as a sacred vessel. When a priest is ordained, he is given his own chalice. This is a symbol of his office. It is sacred, and therefore normally made of precious metals.

Now how has this worked out in practice this “demotion” of chalice to cup? I have seen priests using glass or even wood for the chalice. Getting closer to Jesus, being simply like him? Or just de-emphasizing the purpose of the “cup.” A bit like using coca-cola instead of wine, or a saltine cracker for the host. Now you are downnplaying the doctrine of transubstantiation, of the Real Presence.
It happens. It happened during the reformation, it happened after Vatican II, when iconaclasts take matter into their hands.


21 posted on 12/16/2011 9:58:50 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

Thanks, Robby!


22 posted on 12/16/2011 10:00:29 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: All

I can send you the link to Father Jeremy’s talks if you wish. Just FReepmail me.


23 posted on 12/16/2011 10:15:07 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

ROFL!! Nice!! LOL!!


24 posted on 12/17/2011 1:19:27 AM PST by johngrace (I am a 1 John 4! Christian- declared at every Sunday Mass ,Divine Mercy and Rosary prayers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

If the priests are so attached to the old text that they cannot pray with the new, they’re too attached to the text and not attached enough to prayer.


25 posted on 12/17/2011 1:26:26 AM PST by Mad Dawg (Jesus, I trust in you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

I am very thankful that my parish priest has a wonderful sense of humor in regards to the recent English changes. When last Sunday when he did the monthly children’s mass and was asking the kids questions, he said that he needs a person who knows a little theology. LOL :)=^..^=


26 posted on 12/17/2011 3:31:12 AM PST by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

RobbyS,
you’ve brought up one of the most important points here, the one, as another put it, that gets all the aging hippies’ codwallopers in a bunch. The old phrase: Lex orandi, lex credendi, lex vivendi. As we pray, so we believe. As we believe, so we live. The changes to the translation of the Novus Ordo reflect a more accurate, more reverent, more Catholic statement of belief. The fourth grade terminology of the previous translation, whatever the motives, couldn’t convey as well. When the language used at Mass does not give reverence where it is due, this is likely to encourage people to hold less reverence during Mass, and where it is being held. Language matters, and whatever the genuine motive, the outcome, these last forty years, in part, of reduced care for where they are, in the presence of the Lord, and what they are doing, have hurt people, whether they recognize it or not. At the very least, the changes put us on par with the rest of the world in use of language.

One of the places I have been for Mass has a monsignor who is very advanced in years. Where he had previously spent probably forty or so of his years saying the Novus Ordo to the point of complete comfort with it, he now uses the new Roman Missal, paying greater attention to every word. While he isn’t one of those who had the propensity to, um, “improvise,” he’s making sure he does the red and says the black, probably more than in years past. This is a Good Thing, for him, and for his parish, and for the folks attending periodically there, such as myself.

I am in complete agreement with those who would like to see this as a first step, on a road to greater reverence and tradition in general Catholic life, whether that means Mass eventually returning to the Traditional Latin Mass (my stated preference), or a vernacular version of same. This first step is one I didn’t think I’d live to see. The modernist crowd WILL LOSE, if for no other reason than the FACT that there ARE eternal Truths, much to their dismay. And while this broad brush may not cover all in the category of displeasure over the third translation, I say, good, if they don’t like it. They’ll get used to it, and hopefully, one day, see why they were wrong, and realize the errors of their ways.


27 posted on 12/17/2011 4:27:39 AM PST by sayuncledave (et Verbum caro factum est (And the Word was made flesh))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

I think most of the disciples would have said “cup” rather than “chalice.” Especially the one on whom the Church was built.
Pretty sure Jesus would not have cared then and does not now, what you call it, as long as you get the ox out of the ditch.


28 posted on 12/17/2011 5:13:19 AM PST by Lady Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
The reason is that words have meaning. The first meaning of chalice is, of course, cup, from the Latin “calix.” But during the middle ages, it acquired a special meaning: a cup for the Eucharistic wine. In other words, in using “cup” with the general meaning, the translators ignored the special meaning. Not just “a” cup, but a cup used as a sacred vessel. When a priest is ordained, he is given his own chalice. This is a symbol of his office. It is sacred, and therefore normally made of precious metals.

Exactly. The liberals might use 'mug', or Dixie cup. What's the difference, eh?

29 posted on 12/17/2011 5:34:26 AM PST by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel, if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg
If the priests are so attached to the old text that they cannot pray with the new, they’re too attached to the text and not attached enough to prayer.

You're just saying this because it's true.

30 posted on 12/17/2011 5:35:19 AM PST by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel, if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: cloudmountain
Life is TOO SHORT to sweat the small stuff.

Both too short, and too long, if you get my drift.

I wasn't upset about the old version, and I'm not upset about the new. Also not upset about Spanish (Spain-type, Mexican, or South American) or Vietnamese, or anything at all, really.

That said, I like the vocabulary of the new translation. It Pays to Enrich Your Word Power, and free SAT review is not to be sneezed at.

31 posted on 12/17/2011 6:43:05 AM PST by Tax-chick (Just let the people vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Christ gave us the sacrament of Communion at The Last Supper, a humble repast above a modest inn and a simple meal of bread and wine. You mean to tell me HE would have had something as expensive looking at what is in that photo?


32 posted on 12/17/2011 7:16:28 AM PST by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sayuncledave

Truer words could not be better said.

The one really big test to come will be come Christmas Eve/Christmas Day when the Catholics who are better known as the “C,E,A, and P” Catholics who come at best a few times a year will either notice the change for the better and return or be caught a bit on the “flat-footed side” of NOT being prepared. Time will tell.


33 posted on 12/17/2011 7:18:43 AM PST by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: sayuncledave

“I am in complete agreement with those who would like to see this as a first step, on a road to greater reverence and tradition in general Catholic life, whether that means Mass eventually returning to the Traditional Latin Mass (my stated preference), or a vernacular version of same. This first step is one I didn’t think I’d live to see. The modernist crowd WILL LOSE, if for no other reason than the FACT that there ARE eternal Truths, much to their dismay. And while this broad brush may not cover all in the category of displeasure over the third translation, I say, good, if they don’t like it. They’ll get used to it, and hopefully, one day, see why they were wrong, and realize the errors of their ways.”

We can only HOPE and PRAY that what you said in the end of your posting will come to past in the course of time.


34 posted on 12/17/2011 7:21:38 AM PST by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

If the last Supper was a Passover meal it wouldn’t have been just bread and wine, would it?


35 posted on 12/17/2011 8:49:16 AM PST by Mad Dawg (Jesus, I trust in you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg

As A Catholic of the ‘’old school’’ this is how it was always explained to me. The bread and wine representing the body and blood of Christ. These were after all simple, rather poor Hebrew men of the 1st.AD. Perhaps in reality maybe a fish or two, some dates and other fruits common to that time and place.


36 posted on 12/17/2011 8:57:43 AM PST by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa; Mad Dawg

Jesus and the Apostles were guests of someone for the Passover meal (which includes a whole roast lamb and several cups of wine, among other fixed menu items). Surely the householder would have brought out his family’s best Seder setting. It might have been very nice - the good inherited silver - or might have been basic, if the family had fallen on hard times and pawned the good stuff.

However, the fact that the person owned a house with “a large upper room, well-furnished,” as the Gospel says, suggests the former more than the latter. Although Jesus lived as a mendicant during his public ministry, he was a guest of the well-off numerous times; he was provided for “out of their own resources” by various women of Galilee; and the Apostles had their own funds (carried by Judas Iscariot).

In summary, although it’s fine for us to have our own images of Jesus’s material circumstances and other aspects of His earthly life, those images ought to be consistent with the texts of the Gospels.


37 posted on 12/17/2011 9:12:06 AM PST by Tax-chick (Just let the people vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

well, the synoptics present it as a Seder, FWIW.


38 posted on 12/17/2011 10:00:58 AM PST by Mad Dawg (Jesus, I trust in you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg

Amen to your post. The new presidential prayers (Priest’s prayers) are so reverent, so prayerful.


39 posted on 12/17/2011 11:30:33 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sayuncledave

**Lex orandi, lex credendi, lex vivendi. As we pray, so we believe. As we believe, so we live.**

So right. And some of these disagreeing priests are showing their true colors. LOL!


40 posted on 12/17/2011 11:35:03 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Lady Lucky; AnAmericanMother

Are you a linguist?

Remember the three things happening with the new translation:

Higher linguistic register = chalice rather than cup
Greater adherance to the Latin
Longer sentence (the way Latin was written)


41 posted on 12/17/2011 11:37:15 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

You never know. Remember he sent two disciples ahead to follow a MAN carrying a water jar. (Women, in those days, usually fetched the water.) Then they were to ask him if the Master could eat the Passover at his upper room.

Perhaps the man provided the chalice, the bread, the bitter herbs, the roast lamb......remember this was a Passover meal. Oh, can’t forget the wine! LOL!


42 posted on 12/17/2011 11:41:42 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa
For your information here are some links about a Passover meal with roast lamb (Commerating the Passover when the Israelites ate lamb, marked their doorposts and lintels with the blood of the lamb and ate the meal while ready to journey out of Egypt.)

A Christian Passover Seder for Holy Thursday (or tonight)
Seminarians experience a key Jewish rite [Seder Meal]
What every Christian needs to know about Passover [Passover starts this evening]
Christian seders draw concern

43 posted on 12/17/2011 11:46:09 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg
Thus we have the new words at Communion time (words (Lamb of God) that converted Scott Hahn, a Presbyterian)

"Behold the LAMB of God,
Behold HIM who takes away the sins of the world.
Blessed are those called to the supper of the LAMB."

44 posted on 12/17/2011 11:52:30 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Thanks for the info Salvation. It seems ironic in a way. The thread is talking about the new liturgy and it’s translations, words used, etc. and we’re doing pretty much the same thing. Yes of course The Last Supper was on the night Passover and being observant Jews Jesus and the 12 disciples would be partaking. I guess I’m just looking at it from the perspective of the Catholic teaching of the ‘’old school’’ nuns and priests of long ago who wanted us to focus on the meaning of it— that Jesus knew what he had to do, though he wished he didn’t have to(i.e ‘’the bitter cup’’). No doubt in every sense of history and tradition it would have been a traditional Hebrew Seder of that era.


45 posted on 12/17/2011 11:56:31 AM PST by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

Yes, we have been doing much the same and it is a great conversation. Thanks.


46 posted on 12/17/2011 12:05:57 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

:-)


47 posted on 12/17/2011 12:12:10 PM PST by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

The real problem is that many of the priests simply cannot read properly. The lectors when trained properly know how to read to the congregation quite well. It is the priests who have essentially memorized it all and now find themselves having to read the new translation to the congregation. They should have been reading it over quite a few times in advance of the change being made. Instead, they stand there in front of the congregation and demonstrate their inability to read out loud from a large print book. Some of these priests come across as first grade children reading from a Dick and Jane reader.


48 posted on 12/17/2011 12:42:12 PM PST by CdMGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sayuncledave
Lex orandi, lex credendi, lex vivendi

This says so much in so few words. It works in reverse, too. If we live bad lives, we cease to believe, and we stop communicating with God. Sin cuts off the source of our existence, so we are dead men/women walking. Zombies in the true sense. I have always been pretty liberal in my opinions, but paradoxically, because I grew up in a Protestant environment, I never quite bought into the thinking of the Catholic modernizers. I admired Kueng until I took the time to read carefully one of his books, and thought to myself, not so fast. I find I have much more sympathy with Karl Barth and Bonhoeffer his disciple.Especially Bonhoeffer, a martyr to Christ. I hate those who lie about Pius XII. Don't they know that when Pacelli was negotiating with the Nazis, he had his legs cut out from under him by the German bishops who were fawning over Hitler? The German Church,like the philosophers kept being blindsided by Hitler.

49 posted on 12/17/2011 12:46:30 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

Well, John said it was NOT the passover meal. In any case, I have always thought, in any case, that it was something done after the meal, while they were all still seated at table. Something like: well, we have been following the old Law. Now I give you something new. something to remember me by, the first meal in the new kingdom.


50 posted on 12/17/2011 12:50:47 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson