This story has a very wonderful ending. Neither justice, nor God, nor God's Natural Law will be mocked without a price paid.
Part of it involves the unmistakable overwhelming smell of sulphur bombined with the excruciating human cries of pain steeped in regret-too-late.
The sodomites are so out-of-control, they cannot see the hypocrisy of calling someone “bigot”, especially when, unlike the sodomites, the bishop adheres to the Word of God in this matter, not to mention common sense, biology, and reality in general.
There are somethings that are TRUE whether you like it or not, whether you believe it or not, whether you even know it or not, such as, it’s wrong to violate the natural plumbing of the sexes for homosexual perversion.
There are many folks that are born with a medically discernible predisposition to alcoholism. That does not give them the excuse to go through life drunk and disorderly.
Following God’s word and helping others to find their way to God is “hate” in the words of these bigots? We really need to stop permitting the anti-American, anti-Christian far left to define words. I can’t imagine anything more hateful than allowing someone with a body image problem, who doesn’t think of his leg as a part of him, to have his leg amputated because of a mental health problem. That is equally true for someone who wants his genitals (or her breasts) amputated. How have we reached a point where treating mental illness is “hateful” but embracing a denial of reality is compassionate. The same is true for homosexuality as for the body image issues of transsexuals - even ignoring God’s word as liberals like to do, it makes no sense to treat an unnatural behavior as if it was an unimportant personal choice.
Alinsky method of demonizing/humiliating your opponent.
And I say ‘opponent because it’s clear by their words there is no desire to do anything constructive with the bishops. They know that will go nowhere unless they find either a weak or sympathetic bishop.
This whole same sex marriage thing is gnawing on me...I am tired of it. IMO, only a completely secular state condones it. Our state has freedom to practice ones religion.
Our nations values are set upon judeo christian beliefs. Our declaration of independence, our founding document, cites there are certain unalienalble rights that come from god. Since marriage between a man and woman is considered sacred in religious teachings and a sacrament in others, IMO, same sex marriage is an affront to a state whose values are set on religious dogma. Clearly the intent of the first amendment was not to overrun religious morals. Furthermore, it was never intended, IMO, to be perverted into same sex marriage, an abomination under the mores of our beliefs.
FWIW, I have no problem with civil unions however marriage is something much different, it is an institution which carries the imperator of God’s law. Frankly, it also is a violation of the natural law of procreation but the secularists don’t seem to care.
So, I guess I would need to be painted with a superlative for “arch” bigot. Would that be most bigoted in the eyes of the fags, so be it.
A society with same sex marriage would end it to excists after 50 - 70 years enforced